Harold Navarro

[Harri Lehmuskoski @Lehmuskoski]

Hauskaa, että @cybertruck on kielletty EU:ssa, koska täällä ollaan huolissaan jalankulkijaturvallisuudesta.

Onko kellään tullut mieleen, ettei se auto yksinkertaisesti törmää enää jalankulkijoihin, jos vain annetaan teknologian tehdä tehtävänsä?

[Tobias Goebel (Unsupervised) @tpgoebel]

It just cracks me up that Sweden thinks they can stop FSD because people can set higher speed limits. Have they ever driven ANY car with normal cruise control? 😂😂

[NL F$D Inside @TSLA_inside_]

📢 What are Europe’s other countries waiting for?! 🇪🇺

Since April 10, drivers in the Netherlands have had access to FSD Supervised through national approval by the RDW. Lithuania and Estonia followed, and Belgium is moving too.

So why are countries like Germany 🇩🇪, France 🇫🇷, Italy 🇮🇹, Sweden 🇸🇪, Switzerland 🇨🇭, Austria 🇦🇹, and the UK 🇬🇧 still waiting for slow procedures and delays?

The data is there. Article 39 gives countries the option to act nationally instead of waiting endlessly for bureaucracy.

Europe should not delay innovation and road safety while others are already taking action. Citizens deserve access to safer driving technology now. 🚗

[FSD in Denmark 🇩🇰 @FSDEurope]

Message to the rest of EU regulators 🇪🇺: Safety before politics.

[Whole Mars Catalog @wholemars]

the three most advanced countries in the EU right now:

[Kees Roelandschap @KRoelandschap]

The @ETSC_EU going full throttle on the anti-FSD path again

They try so hard to stay relevant and in doing so completely undermining their credibility.

At least to those paying attention and not be distracted by their clever name Safety and Transport Council, safety is the least of their concern. This is a politically motivated article, once again.

They do not have a single clue what they’re talking about

Using a picture of a US vehicle driving on Autopilot and not even on FSD further accentuates their ignorance to the matter at hand

[Alex @alex_avoigt]

Let's say it loud and clear: The UNECE is full of a bunch of incompetent idiots who have made travel in Europe and other countries less safe.

If you have no clue about autonomous driving systems, how NN learning works and doesn't understand FSD, get another job and don't stand in the way.

[Tesla Club Portugal @tesla_club_pt]

O caminho do FSD pela Europa : Países Baixos 🇳🇱 > Lituânia 🇱🇹 > Estónia

Quem se segue!? Vamos 🇪🇺 Vamos 🇵🇹

Um por um 🦾⚡️

[TONY™ @TONYxTWO]

Why are people still keying Tesla’s?

These people are unhinged.

Make her famous!

[Tesla Club Portugal @tesla_club_pt]

‼️Terça-feira dia 2 Junho o SuperCharger de LOULÉ estará fechado em trabalhos de expansão. ‼️

[Kees Roelandschap @KRoelandschap]

UNECE says FSD can't initiate lane changes in Europe

FSD didn't get the memo

Watched it happen in real time with @robotinreallife

This is why the regulatory debate matters and why UNECE sucks big time

Watch it on YT ⬇️

[Genma_Jp @nymbusjp]

Europe’s regulators aren’t protecting you from Tesla.

They’re protecting themselves from irrelevance.
The painfully slow approval of Full Self-Driving in Europe isn’t about safety. It’s about incentives.

Regulators’ entire existence depends on the public believing they are the ones who “keep everyone safe.” If they approve FSD quickly, they have to admit something uncomfortable: Tesla has already done the real work.

Billions of miles of real-world validation on Cortex. Over 10 billion miles driven in the United States. The system has been stress-tested at a scale no government lab could ever replicate. The data is overwhelming.

So what do regulators do? They invent new hoops to jump through. They demand tests that are orders of magnitude less rigorous than what Tesla has already completed. Why? Because if they don’t, they have zero visible “added value.” And zero added value means zero justification for their budgets, their jobs, and their authority.

They cannot simply say: “Tesla has already solved this better than we ever could.” That would be career suicide. It would expose that they are, at best, redundant — and at worst, actively slowing down safer roads for millions of Europeans.

So they delay. They nitpick. They posture. Not because FSD is dangerous, but because admitting it isn’t would threaten their own livelihood.

This isn’t regulation. It’s institutional self-preservation dressed up as public protection.

The longer they stall, the clearer it becomes: Europe’s biggest obstacle to safer autonomous driving isn’t the technology. It’s the people whose job it is to approve it.

[Tesla Europe, Middle East & Africa @teslaeurope]

FSD Supervised now approved in Estonia🇪🇪. Rollout will begin soon

[Kees Roelandschap @KRoelandschap]

Netherlands 🇳🇱 approved FSD on April 11

Lithuania 🇱🇹 approves FSD on May 20th

Greece 🇬🇷 will approve FSD in June

Meanwhile Sweden 🇸🇪 be like:

bUt cAn iT hANdLe a StrAiGhT HigHWaY

🤷🏽

[Daniel Smidstrup @DanielSmidstrup]

USA has ChatGPT
USA has Grok
USA has Claude
USA has Gemini

China has DeepSeek
China has Qwen
China has Kimi
China has MiniMax

Europe has?

[REFLACT, Roger Rusch (Leadership, Teamwork, EVs) @REFLACTtraining]

10 Jahre fake News in einem Bereich, wo ich mich ziemlich gut auskenne (E-Mobilität und Tesla) und es deshalb beurteilen kann, haben mir aufgezeigt, wie kaputt die heutigen Medien sind.

Inzwischen betrachte ich JEDEN MSM-Artikel anfangs erstmal als falsch, die Realität nicht abbildend oder zumindest einseitig/undifferenziert. Mit folgenden Fragen im Hinterkopf versuche ich dann, Qualität & Glaubwürdigkeit des Textes einzuschätzen:

• WER hat den Artikel geschrieben? Ist mir diese Person schon vorher durch einseitigen/schludrigen Journalismus oder plumpe Meinungsmache aufgefallen?

• Erscheint der Artikel arg einseitig und deutet damit auf eine hidden AGENDA hin? Wenn ja, welche und in wessen Interesse?

• Handelt es sich um sachlichen Journalismus oder um einen der vielen Fälle, wo ein Journi die mediale Reichweite zur Verbreitung seiner persönlichen MEINUNG missbraucht?

• Sind Aussagen mit Fakten belegt, oder besteht der Text grossteils aus BEHAUPTUNGEN ohne entsprechende Verweise?

• Sind die aufgeführten FAKTEN korrekt und die verwendeten QUELLEN qualitativ zweifelsfrei?

• Was wurde AUSGELASSEN, aufgeblasen oder kleingeredet?

[Robin @m8nimal]

Legacy Auto Europe are scrambling with their last tactics to try and stop Tesla FSD from going world wide! It will not work, Tesla has finally won! June 30

[STHEEN @bitstheen]

Another criminal entity desperately trying to block Tesla FSD in Europe, just to buy legacy carmakers a little more time before they become completely irrelevant.

The level of corruption in Europe is unprecedented.

[FSD in Denmark 🇩🇰 @FSDEurope]

Another fake news and clickbait headlines from @Reuters around Tesla FSD approval in the EU

The Danish Road Traffic Authority has officially stated they “have at no point expressed either positive or negative opinions” about Tesla FSD Supervised.

https://t.co/csHN2RRB3l

[Kees Roelandschap @KRoelandschap]

They are one by one pieces of ….

No knowledge, only prejudice

Nothing, but nothing they do is with safety as a top priority

They have not a single clue what the concept of safety even means

Politically motivated and power hungry

Sorry to say but it’s the truth