@RubyD_JinaG Data forensics showed that email was sent from surface pro, home IP address. He didn't leave at 5:15. Also because CVS was so close it shares the exact same cell tower as their home.
@halliecou Seriously who in their right mind decides to date & marry someone who's children were allegedly murdered by someone who looks just like you. 3 yrs after and your married with a trial recieving national attention- not smart at all. Tell me you are socially oblivious.
Reguardless of your analogy. Men unknowingly support other men's violent behavior by not saying anything about their friend who says, or does off putting behaviors before crimes even happen. Then when it does happen they put distance between each other but never speak- out against that person. They fail to realize that because they never condemned their behavior they were actual co-signing it. Most violent men do not hide their behavior, it is just accepted, because testosterone and boys will be boys attitudes. Men think that avoiding each these violent men is condemning their behavior when it really is neglect to call them out on it.
Seroquel amongst other antipyschotic, snris, ssris, and benzos are known to researchers to have dangerous side effects. They believe the positive out comes outweigh the negative outcomes, a common reasoning amongst pharmaceuticals that bare a slew of side effects. There have many lawsuits holding these companies accountable.
Source: https://t.co/FDrASGAzbV https://t.co/Afs3ul9Gon
1) that' not true, I quite a few discussions on dispared treatment from the collective
2) Your argument against the insanity plea shows a complete misunderstanding of mental health and psychiatric medication. There is a massive difference between people who kill out of malice and those who experience severe, chemically induced altered states. Many people actively seek help, only to be handed medications with severe black box warnings that completely rewrite brain chemistry and behavior. Equating these two groups ignores the established science of pharmaceutical side effects and severe mental illness.
Matthew Schleier was found NGRI on August 29th after strangling his son to save him from foodallergies after being prescribed Seroquel.
He sought help w suicidal thoughts & was turned away for not having a plan. He told his family.
His story is nearly identical to Lindsey’s.
You just described how psychosis can manifest. Psychosis is a highly dynamic condition that actively waxes and wanes which was explained multiple times during this trial, meaning a person's acute symptoms, clarity, and level of distress naturally fluctuate over time rather than remaining in a permanent, static state.
You mistakenly assumes that because someone shows temporary moments of clarity, insight, or severe anxiety, they cannot be experiencing a true psychotic break. In reality, an individual can experience lucid intervals interwoven with acute delusional episodes or unshared sensory experiences.
Nike co-founder Phil Knight and his wife Penny, just pledged $1.1 billion to build Oregon’s first women’s health hospital!
Comprehensive care for women at each life stage including menopause under one roof
More of these visionary plans please,🩷
There is no contradiction here. Men who are genuinely mentally incapacitated qualify for NGRI. That is an established legal framework, not a lack of support.
Calling my previous statements bullshit is top-tier deflection from the actual reasons why the LC case receives national support while male perpetrators of similar crimes do not. The media covers male family annihilators differently because statistics show those crimes are usually driven by domestic violence, control, or revenge—not documented psychiatric neglect. If you dislike how these cases are framed, your issue is with media presentation and statistical realities, not my argument.
You are actively avoiding the real source of the issue here. Turning this into a tit-for-tat argument avoids the root issue, which is exactly why men often don't get sympathy in general.
Furthermore, the GoFundMe was specifically set up to help her parents recover financially after uprooting their lives. Regarding the criminal charges, her husband never requested a criminal indictment. From the beginning, Patrick Clancy's public statements have been entirely consistent that his wife was suffering from a severe, acute psychiatric condition. However, state prosecutors dictate indictments, not individual family members.
Comparing these situations is a deflection from a larger reality: men drastically underutilize mental health resources, preventing early intervention before a tragedy occurs. True awareness requires listening and learning healthy coping mechanisms instead of letting bottled-up pain turn into misdirected anger which exactly what you are doing with tgis conversation.
That statement is fundamentally inaccurate regarding how Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI) murder cases are handled in Massachusetts.
To be clear, I am not a Lindsay Clancy supporter, nor do I want her executed—which isn't even legally possible given that Massachusetts has no death penalty.
My concern is that the public and certain government officials are abandoning the core American principle of being innocent until proven guilty.
Spreading this kind of misinformation establishes a dangerous narrative. The truth is that an NGRI verdict in a case involving murders would result in long-term institutionalization in a psychiatric facility, just like the case of Andrea Yates.
While mental health medications like SSRIs help many individuals manage their symptoms, they can also cause significant adverse effects. It is important to remember historical cases like the Eli Lilly Prozac lawsuits of the 1990s, which highlighted these risks. Ongoing research into permanent biological impacts, severe withdrawal phases, and rebound symptoms raises critical questions about long-term dependency. For many who may not have required lifelong treatment, these factors can make it incredibly difficult to safely discontinue the medication.
https://t.co/bfvEWVfCAJ
Psychiatric medications require much more comprehensive diagnostic testing before they are prescribed. A single, one-hour intake appointment is simply insufficient to formulate an accurate diagnosis, especially given the significant symptom overlap among different mental health conditions. Furthermore, clinicians rarely order routine laboratory work to rule out underlying metabolic or biological deficits that could be causing these symptoms. This trial-and-error approach to prescribing can have devastating consequences, particularly when a patient is given a medication that counteracts their true underlying physiology.
That is incorrect. You claimed men lack the support women receive during NGRI pleas, but when asked for specifics, you offered theories instead of facts.
You, like many are treating this conversation like a competition to win, which makes real dialogue impossible. My goal was a constructive discussion aimed at better outcomes for everyone.
Instead, you have gone on the defensive and made excuses. Pointing to unfair treatment without providing evidence or data achieves nothing and stalls the conversation entirely.
Your behavior showcases exactly why a lot of men get the push back they do, there is no logic or emotional regulation, just word tantrums that lack real substance.
You mentioned the difference, but having five kids back then meant they could hold each other accountable, help with chores, and guide one another as they grew up. I assume your children were raised in the '90s or 2000s? Back then, there was a stronger stay-at-home community in neighborhoods looking out for the kids, more outdoor play, better wages, and affordable childcare.When you compare that to today, most homes have a maximum of two children, there is little to no community support, and neighbors rarely know each other. Wages haven't kept up with living costs, forcing one or both parents to work overtime, and childcare is both incredibly expensive and poorly vetted. The system simply provided more structural help during your time than families receive now. Even with my two children—the youngest is 16 and the oldest is in her 20s—I had more support than parents of young children do today. Parenting under these current conditions feels nearly impossible, and it makes me question how stable the balance really was back then, considering how many children and spouses ultimately struggled to maintain supportive relationships.
@TimBurn51545300@BillOliger@xQwirk He withdrew his plea as NGRI, also per Google it is my understanding that members of the community and family witness reported that he was extremely abusive and prone to violence. Unlike LC he was not identified as a loving parent.
I can only answer for myself and not all women. As I stated I am a mother, my core concern is child safety and pushing for better mental health safeguards so no more babies are harmed. Sadly there is no bringing thise babies back, so while we discuss her punishment, why don't we discuss the failures that contributed.
Let's be clear: If prosecution proved she did it, all evidence showed it was done while cogniscente and she received recieve a guilty, let her rot in hell.
Additionally an insanity plea doesn't absolve anyone. Nobody just walks free; they are involuntarily institutionalized. Statistics show that after eight years, 35% are still institutionalized, 47% are out under strict court and medical restraint, and only 15% are released unconditionally. Is eight years enough? Never. But our justice system is flawed across the board, and regular murderers often walk free in that same timeframe. Frankly, men dismissing the reality of the insanity plea doesn't surprise me, given how consistently that gender disregards its own mental health.
Turning high-profile tragedies into a competition to avoid male accountability is exhausting. Yes, women can commit violence, but statistics prove that men commit the vast majority of violent crimes. Using rare, specific cases to argue that women are equally dangerous is a toxic distraction. It is repulsive to see a mother's postpartum mental health crisis weaponized and criticized, especially when she actively reached out for help—something the majority of violent male perpetrators fail to do.
The fact that he used synthetic marijuana is what triggered his psychotic break. Like I outlined in my first post, the criteria to qualify for NGRI are incredibly strict. At the time of the crimes, he had no doctor, no diagnosis, and no prescription medication. If he had chosen to seek professional medical help instead of trying to self-medicate his symptoms away, he would have had a legitimate leg to stand on in court.
I didn’t know about this case before now. If the records showed he was actively trying to get help, had a diagnosed history, and was failed by doctors who neglected him, I would have been advocating for him and any other who receive subpar care resulting in tragedies.
We cannot ignore that antidepressants, benzos, and antipsychotics alter brain chemistry drastically. There is a massive track record going back to the 1990s of pharmaceutical giants losing major lawsuits because their drugs were linked to sudden suicides, murders, and extreme violence—the Eli Lilly Prozac cases are a prime example.
As I said, men just don’t get the help they need. The stigma around male mental health is devastating, and honestly, you guys need to take accountability for how you treat each other, call out the stigma among your peers, and break these cycles. Thay behavior is the center of the male toxcity that society complains about. Men deserve to be heard but not at the cost dismantling the positive progress women have advocated for on our own health. This not a competition. Progress for your gender starts when you finally start holding each other and selves accountable.
The reality is stark: men have built a culture that polices vulnerability and penalizes health awareness. Physical symptoms are shrugged off until they become crises, while mental health struggles are buried under the false premise that emotion equals weakness.
The systemic double standard is clear. Statistically and legally, any man with a documented psychiatric history this severe would routinely secure institutional support or an NGRI finding. Name one man who met the mental health history criteria who didn't get NGRI? The Stats are directly from google. This is a fundamental failure of men to advocate for each other and break the cycle.
As a mother, wife, daughter, and sister, I see the tragic irony: the exact same resources are available to everyone, yet men willingly sacrifice their own well-being out of fear of what other men think.