Pera

Permanently positive

$ANyONe $LINK $SDL $PEPE $ALPH $ONDO

[Pera @Hos1__]

@ChainlinkAnt @Risen_SzN Yep though so, you're just an antisocial fucking weirdo

[Pera @Hos1__]

@ChainlinkAnt @Risen_SzN If you after reading that post and looking at the photos think that's just someone tagging over his art piece and "it's the graffiti culture" I don't know what to tell you...

[Pera @Hos1__]

@ChainlinkAnt @Risen_SzN tell me you're an antisocial retard without telling me.

[Pera @Hos1__]

@aka_gaurang @Tabl4me fuck off with your out of ass pulled estimates "it was mentioned but no details" we must go to moon! Retard

[Pera @Hos1__]

@armyant77 @chainlink @ChrisBarrett You guys think Sergey and the team should pump the token price up just because you're too impatient to let the game theory run its course? If you want to stop getting ridiculed for owning the tokens of a project with top 3 fundamentals of any crypto just touch grass for once.

[Pera @Hos1__]

@Zerohedge77 @chainlink Well go buy the token so the price go up you poor fuck!

[Pera @Hos1__]

@CCIPTracker Keep in mind this tracks just the DeFi side of CCIP fees and volume...

[ROGER MOON | HCC @rogermoonCrypto]

That's right ladies. We don't stop.
$ANYONE is about to take off. 🚀

One quick look at their new VPN app, and you instantly know this privacy coin is destined for billions:

https://t.co/CzdxtURu77

@AnyoneFDN // $ETH $ZEC $XMR

[LINK Archive @LINKArchv]

Sergey explains why CCIP is the most secure cross-chain infrastructure

“CCIP has many individual key security design decisions, but three of the larger ones that I tend to think about when I look at its security compared to other cross-chain systems would be the amount of decentralization that actually confirms a transaction”

“There are cross-chain systems that are basically multi-sigs of one, two, three sets of signers or keys. Then there are cross-chain systems that are basically hubs where all transactions flow through one hub”

“And then there's CCIP, which for every single lane has three oracle networks. Not three nodes, but three individual separate networks responsible for confirming three separate aspects of the transaction”

“The amount of decentralization within CCIP just by the amount of nodes independently verifying key parts of the transaction in a very focused way is at a much higher level than any other bridge”

“The second key difference is the fact that there's a risk management layer. So, there's a risk management network, which is one of those key networks where you can encode specific policies and configurations and conditions around how to approach different security risks that might emerge”

“If a specific chain has a certain type of risk—it reorgs, there's reliability issues, an adversary has invented a new attack—you have a place where you can go and you can write some code and encode those set of risks and those set of conditions separately from the core protocol���

“So, you're not changing the core protocol that provides the core security; you're adding security by putting more conditions on what a transaction needs to meet in the risk management network”

“So, you're keeping the core security in a stable protocol and you're adding more security by putting more code, more configurations in the risk management network. This is another kind of layer of decentralization and the ability to quickly adapt”

“One of the third key things that was done is actually that the two core transactional networks—the committing DON and the executing DON—and the risk management network have been written in separate codebases”

“The core protocol is written in a completely separate codebase in a completely different language, initially written by a completely separate team from the team that wrote the risk management network in its own codebase and its own language”

“And both of these parts of the system are continuing to be very separate not only in how they operate, but also in that they're separate codebases written in separate different languages”

“And this is a very significant difference because even if you're able to break one of those codebases because you know one language or you found one flaw, that flaw does not extend to the other codebase”

“And so it's really the only bridge in which you have a kind of client diversity and separate codebases interacting with each other in a secure way”

“There's many other great security features within CCIP that far surpass what you see in other bridges, and that's why CCIP has been operating successfully with no value loss, no hiccups, continual reliability, and a bunch of other successful outcomes”

“I think it's something that the time that it took to build was a good decision, and that's consistently what I see when you make infrastructure that's going to process and move and interact with trillions of dollars in transactional value, which is what the Chainlink system and CCIP are being built to do”

“Our goal is not to just transact and process the transactions and move the data of today, but it's to do that for the whole world in the trillions and trillions of dollars, possibly at some point even reaching the size and amount of transaction value that you see in the traditional financial system, which is in the quadrillions per year”

[Pera @Hos1__]

@oacidoegenteboa @mousesports jimpfa to NAVI

[Pera @Hos1__]

@knilniahc @chainlink Any day now🤣 Probably still atleast 2 years to go most likely

[Pera @Hos1__]

@ecom_joseph Yep seems like you have to be super specific in what you're asking. Now you have to tell it to take certain things into consideration. It won't think. It just does what you ask it to and saves as much tokens as it can

[Pera @Hos1__]

@usernamoss @arcamids If you think that way you're ill informed. Token is designed in such a way that higher value = higher security for the whole network. But we'll see man, I don't have a hurry in the world

[Pera @Hos1__]

@usernamoss @arcamids At this rate it's 3 years away.

[Pera @Hos1__]

@StevenY03870741 @ChrisBarrett Yep no building happening at all

[Pera @Hos1__]

@jccrwchmc @WuBlockchain @ChainLinkGod @LINK_Zilla Yep this is the bullish piece imo... Not the reserve necessarily becaause every time they dump in these prices is like gift from heavens

[Pera @Hos1__]

@Ivan_the_gent Another block 🫡

[Pera @Hos1__]

@baebong42 @DMG3465 To me it seems like 1k will probably be enough. 2030-2032, beyond that Link will likely scale much more though...

[Pera @Hos1__]

@TheLinkPanda @arcamids @ChrisBarrett @Crypto_BitC @thegraphers This list is just retarded grifting ragebaiting fagotts. Might aswell consider this list as who you should block if you didn't want trash on your feed. X algorithm is the reason these profiles gain traction. Hope it will change soon.

[Pera @Hos1__]

@MrMib @thegraphers Yeah that's a hypothetical situation and has nothing to do with reality though... In reality chainlink svr could capture maybe 1% of that at maximum so 1920 dollars per staked 1k link. I don't know why you pull numbers out of your ass and state them as facts