Hot Icicles

To all of the hot ladies out there. thanks for the attention, but I'm not gay.

[Hot Icicles @hot_icicles]

@John_Americani We don't need any more of this. Is it what happened to the neanderthals? Or was it the ice age? Whatever the cause, we must protect our genetic heritage. 1% is us in danger of extinction.

[Hot Icicles @hot_icicles]

@maga_monk @pippaisright @nigelthegoat @Keir_Starmer So far we're having as much success as he is with the boats. 😂😅👍🤣😭😅

[Anthony @Kabbage1977]

@pippaisright @Keir_Starmer I can caption 😉 “Donald! Please please let our government play with Anthropic! We are brain dead morons without Claude, I’ll suck the baby dry! Please” 😃

[Pippa B 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🚜 ❤️ 🇺🇸 @pippaisright]

Weakling @Keir_Starmer is like the odd one out as he is completely ignored by President Trump!

[Hot Icicles @hot_icicles]

@benonwine @antapaws1 That's one hellova thump.

[Hot Icicles @hot_icicles]

@Alexarmstrong @jatroa A medal for his ex foster mom who tried to help him and got cancelled.

[Hot Icicles @hot_icicles]

@VictoriaHa50399 @AwakeNotWoke999 That dreadful hand gesture again. The guys certainly strange. More turns than my tumble dryer and that's full of hot air too.

[Hot Icicles @hot_icicles]

@realMaalouf @destinyangel5 Ps. Why the arsenal shirt?

[Hot Icicles @hot_icicles]

@realMaalouf @destinyangel5 Yeah. As always

[Hot Icicles @hot_icicles]

@Keir_Starmer @eucopresident You aren't in a position to go against the people.

[Hot Icicles @hot_icicles]

@SBarrettBar Does she sleep in bunches? That floppy hair!

[Hot Icicles @hot_icicles]

Message to Sir Keir Starmer.. Check out The Daily Core News's video! #TikTok https://t.co/T7kibjkF7s

[Hot Icicles @hot_icicles]

Check out Nicola West's video! #TikTok https://t.co/FElmhVyUys
The one and only Keir Starmer.

[Jamie @Jamiemullen67]

@SBarrettBar 🇬🇧 We bring our kids up.
We Decide and set their rules.
Our responsibility
Not the government's !

[Chris Heatherly @chrisheatherly]

I’m actually a child online safety expert and was one of the pioneers in this space with Club Penguin and so I feel uniquely positioned to critique this.

The groomer problem is real but it’s also vastly overstated. The far larger issue we saw at Penguin was suicidality or reports of sexual abuse in the home.

There is no solution for lazy/bad parenting. You can implement all the ID laws you want but if parents are going to just hand kids their phones unlocked, those kids will have access to all the same things the parents have unfettered.

What I found is that these draconian safety laws actually make it harder to be an honest operator of kids apps because on one hand it’s so much legal risk and so much user friction that it simply becomes uninvestible as a business.

Parents will just lie to let their kids use the unfettered internet. For example, I have a friend who works in mobile gaming who has two kids, one above and one below the age limit but separated by just 2 yrs, and the two wanted to play and chat together on Roblox - which is reasonable. To do this, he just verified that his younger kid is old enough for the chat feature when he’s not.

This happens all the time and will happen with these laws to. How far do we want to go with this? Scan the face of the user in real-time to make sure it’s not a kid using the device? We could do that but it feels like a massive unwanted intrusion of privacy.

That’s how you know this law isn’t about kids. COPPA and GDPR-K and so forth already make it illegal to allow chat and other grooming vectors to kids.

What’s really being done here is trying to eliminate online anonymity. And this is a far bigger issue that goes to core speech rights because if you cannot criticize the govt anonymously and if wrong speech is a crime then it becomes easy to identify all the detractors of the govt in power, and ban, fine or jail them for speech crimes.

Starmer has already been doing this and he wants to do it at a much bigger scale. Starmer won’t even acknowledge the problem of actual grooming gangs in Britain’s neighborhoods but he’s worried about online grooming?

No he’s not, and this hypocrisy gives away the game. What he wants is to kill online anonymity so he can enforce censorship of his unpopular policies. No politician should have this power.

[Seán Ako 🇮🇪 @TheAkoFiles]

My first instinct was to support the UK’s social media ban for under 16s.

Protecting children from grooming, exploitation and harmful content seems like common sense.

But I’m seeing a lot of opposition to it, so I’m genuinely curious as to why?

One thing making me second guess is that platforms like bluesky are exempt, while at the same time there’s a push to let 16 year olds vote. To me that looks less like child protection and more like controlling where young people get their information.

Interested to hear other perspectives.

[Masquerade Fitzgerald @MasqueradeFitz]

Every British citizen will be forced to hand over their identity documents to a US tech giant. This company will then outsource the processing to a Third World country where the documents will likely be leaked.

This is madness. It’s not protecting children; it’s simply a case of uninformed people in power making a foolish decision.

[Ye Olde Holborn☣️ @Ye_Olde_Holborn]

@leicesterliz I wouldn’t let the likes of you near children

[Hot Icicles @hot_icicles]

@Ye_Olde_Holborn @leicesterliz Labour should come with a health warning near our kids.

[Hot Icicles @hot_icicles]

@RedWallPleb @leicesterliz Blair's son needs the cash.