@icenewz@OldeWorldOrder@libsoftiktok Fuck no. I’d hate to be like the US with respect to gun laws. I don’t want or need to be armed. Getting killed by a gun here is almost as rare as getting eaten by a shark
@PhilProctor16@WestCoastEagles And that’s horrible
He’s out of contract, undersized, a half forward which we don’t need and highly unlikely to be around when we’re contending. I get we need mature bodies but look at who North is targeting. I’d much rather a Parker or Darking at the picks being suggested
@PhilProctor16@WestCoastEagles Ummm no
- Owies was going to be delisted
- Baker is an out of contract, undersized half forward
- Sliding from pick 3 to 12, similar 2 examples, Sheezel to Ginbey, Bont to Sheed
@mikpara@BradicalAu@WestCoastEagles Owies was going to be delisted
Bakeries out of contract and an undersized half forward who can do a few minutes through the middle…
@Naqohs@mikpara@WestCoastEagles Owies was going to be delisted
Baker is 27 and an undersized half forward
The difference between pick 3 and pick 12 is Sheezel > Ginbey…
Baker for 26 or out F2 was fair
@ThnxRoos4Harley @CalTwomey@traderadio@AFLcomau This happens and I’m switching to GWS. The last few years have been hard enough living in Sydney but taking a 3 year old to a half full stadium with plenty of room is far more enticing than this sh*t show of an organisation
@CalTwomey what will be 15 and 17 after academies, plus a player who was likely to be delisted for pick 3? F*ck me, what a sh*t show. Living in Sydney, I’m heading to GWS
@ClarkyHeraldSun@superfooty@theheraldsun Baker for Pick 12?? What are the media smoking this trade period. It’s hilariously bad how little the media, who’s job it is to cover AFL full time, know about player and pick value
@tommorris32 Snooze? lol. Every single West Coast supporter is happy with this outcome. You don’t think this has anything to do with WC telling Hawthorn to get better picks?
Barrass for Baker + a 4-6 pick upgrade is a horrendous outcome, we’d all much prefer to just keep Barrass