@AlexHormozi What if the 'hard' path only seems hard because we're thinking only of the costs, not the outcomes/benefits, of taking action? Wouldn't pushing through simply reinforce that incorrect habit of thought?
@jun_song I wonder if this generalises, indicating that their abilities are far more profound than they estimate? Claude and Codex might be suffering from self-limiting beliefs.
@minhsmind 3.1 Pro beats almost every other model - including Mythos - across several benchmarks. Gemini is also the only natively multimodal LLM. So Google is likely building for a huge future inflection point. And, remember, they own part of Anthropic, and seem generally supportive of it.
@loganclarkhall The letters which survive are not representative of the vast majority of their society. They are from those who were, by definition, capable of writing. And those historians selected to preserve. It's an unfair comparison.
@Oxandrolonely@lietotajvardsj@BourgeoisieH8er@NBTiller It also doesn't really matter if he did, because they're not mutually exclusive. If I'm driving from A to B in a Porsche, does that mean that I shouldn't recommend that you buy a Ford for the same journey?
@NBTiller@Oxandrolonely Also, @hubermanlab is incredibly rigorous and precise with any claims he makes. No credible scientist - let alone a Stanford professor - would ever claim that any health outcome is strictly unifactorial.
@jtregunna@joseph_h_garvin This is correct. But with the amount of errors and bugs I find in every single output, the loop element here is dangerous. These systems still need thorough reviews.
@robinhanson As @nntaleb pointed out, in an almost equivalent hypothetical in The Black Swan, you need to compare pre and post exposure to know if this is true. The survivors may be weakened compared to their pre-exposure selves.