hubblenetwork

Bluetooth to Space. Building a low earth orbit satellite network that any Bluetooth-enabled device can connect to.

[hubblenetwork @hubble_network]

The infrastructure layer behind connected systems matters a lot more than most people realize.

When connectivity becomes reliable and inexpensive enough, entire categories of assets suddenly become worth monitoring for the first time.

That changes how companies think about operations, maintenance, logistics, and deployment strategy altogether.

[Alejandro Cremades @acremades]

(NEW EPISODE) This Serial Entrepreneur Raised Over $100 Million To Enable Standard Bluetooth Devices To Communicate Directly With Satellites From Anywhere On Earth @hubble_network https://t.co/AyMu5Vjw0t @GaingelsVC @ycombinator @seraphim_space #entrepreneur #business #success

[hubblenetwork @hubble_network]

OpenAI is building robots. Every robot becomes a source of continuous real-world data, and that data is often just as valuable as the robot itself.

The challenge isn't generating that data. It's moving it reliably.

As physical AI expands into infrastructure, agriculture, and field operations, connectivity becomes critical. Data is useless if it never makes it back to the systems that need it.

That's exactly the kind of connectivity challenge Hubble is built to solve.

[hubblenetwork @hubble_network]

Most connectivity infrastructure was built around where people live.
Hubble is built around where operations actually happen.

From industrial infrastructure to agriculture to global shipping, connected systems need to keep reporting far beyond traditional coverage assumptions.

[hubblenetwork @hubble_network]

Hubble’s Head of Software recently joined the Mr. Beacon Podcast to break down what it actually takes to make Bluetooth-to-space work at scale.

From hybrid terrestrial + satellite infrastructure to ultra-low-cost global asset tracking, it’s a fascinating look at how existing Bluetooth hardware is starting to operate far beyond traditional coverage limits.

Watch here: https://t.co/5wgH769528

[hubblenetwork @hubble_network]

One of the more interesting things happening in connectivity right now is that existing wireless hardware is starting to operate in environments it was never originally designed for.

A standard Bluetooth chip communicating with satellites would have sounded unrealistic not very long ago.

Now it’s becoming part of how global connected systems get built.

[hubblenetwork @hubble_network]

@SpaceX The future of connectivity isn’t just cities.

It’s infrastructure reaching places traditional networks were never built around.

[hubblenetwork @hubble_network]

Software scales quickly. Physical infrastructure doesn’t.

That’s why so many connected systems look seamless in demos, then become much harder once they move into the real world.

The gap between software assumptions and physical-world conditions is where a lot of infrastructure starts breaking down.

What infrastructure limitation do you think the industry still underestimates most?

[hubblenetwork @hubble_network]

Connectivity gets really disruptive once it becomes cheap enough to make deployment always a yes.

That’s when companies start monitoring things they previously ignored entirely.

Lower-cost assets.
Temporary deployments.
Remote infrastructure.
Physical systems that never made economic sense to connect before.

That shift is already changing how connected products get built.

[hubblenetwork @hubble_network]

Most connected devices don’t fail because the hardware breaks. They fail because the infrastructure around them does.

The sensor works. The battery works. The software works.

Then the device leaves a predictable environment and suddenly reporting becomes inconsistent, delayed, or disappears entirely.

That’s the part of connected systems the industry still underestimates.

[hubblenetwork @hubble_network]

Texas Instruments recently featured how their Bluetooth® LE MCUs work with Hubble’s network to enable global asset tracking using existing low-power hardware.

No custom radios.
No specialized hardware.
Multi-year battery life.
Connectivity through terrestrial infrastructure + LEO satellites.

As connectivity infrastructure changes, the economics and scale of what becomes practical to monitor start changing with it.

Watch here:
https://t.co/F0keQCyGiD

[hubblenetwork @hubble_network]

One of the bigger shifts happening across connected systems is that operational visibility is no longer being reserved only for the highest-value assets.

As deployment costs fall, industries can start monitoring many more components of the physical world continuously.

[hubblenetwork @hubble_network]

A lot of industrial systems still depend on people manually checking whether something happened.

Did the shipment arrive?
Did the conditions stay stable?
Did the system report recently?

As connected systems improve, more of those workflows start becoming predictive instead of reactive.

[hubblenetwork @hubble_network]

Physical-world systems generate enormous amounts of operational data every day.

The challenge isn’t collecting more information.

It’s reducing the delay between what’s happening physically and what operations teams actually know digitally.

[hubblenetwork @hubble_network]

A stolen vehicle doesn’t disappear. It just moves somewhere your current system can’t follow.

The weak point isn’t detection — it’s what happens when the vehicle leaves the area where your tracker has coverage.

Hubble’s customers track vehicles using a Bluetooth chip embedded deep in the hardware. No external antenna. No SIM card. Hard to find, harder to disable.
Designed to maintain visibility beyond traditional coverage assumptions.

[hubblenetwork @hubble_network]

Here’s a workflow that still happens every day across supply chains and field operations:

Someone physically walks to a location to confirm that something is where it should be.

Not because there’s no technology available. Because the technology they have doesn’t cover that location reliably.

That’s an infrastructure problem.

Connected systems don’t reduce manual labor by default — they only do it where coverage actually holds.

[hubblenetwork @hubble_network]

95M+ access points.

That’s the scale of Hubble’s terrestrial network today, and it’s still growing.

A lot of IoT deployments still depend on stitching together local infrastructure, gateways, and coverage assumptions around where devices are expected to operate.

We’re focused on making connectivity work far beyond those predictable environments.

[hubblenetwork @hubble_network]

One of the more interesting things about modern asset tracking is that the biggest operational losses often don’t come from the most expensive assets.

They come from the smaller assets nobody thought were worth tracking.

Tools, containers, equipment, sensors, and parts moving constantly through physical operations.

That’s starting to change as asset tracking systems become lower cost and easier to deploy at scale.

[hubblenetwork @hubble_network]

A surprising amount of operational friction still comes from people having to manually verify information that systems of record should already know.

Checking inventory counts.
Confirming shipments moved.
Validating environmental conditions.
Following up on missing updates.

That’s a big part of what we design Hubble Network around: helping connected systems operate with more continuous awareness, so teams spend less time manually chasing information.

[hubblenetwork @hubble_network]

One of the more interesting shifts happening right now is how existing consumer-scale device ecosystems are starting to operate far beyond the environments they were originally designed for.

That changes what global connectivity can start looking like at scale.