HumblePleb

[HumblePleb @humblepleb__]

@Richard_Logs 谢谢你，及时修补了我碎掉的心

[HumblePleb @humblepleb__]

@BitcoinIsaiah Lol I almost forgot Bitcoin Tina without you mentioning him.

[HumblePleb @humblepleb__]

@GrassFedBitcoin @MrHodl @w_s_bitcoin @_DannyKnowles @grok what’s the key takeaway?

[HumblePleb @humblepleb__]

@quarktalksss 看来没有什么能困住勇敢者和自由人去到 land of the free and the home of the brave.‌‌

[HumblePleb @humblepleb__]

@Excellion I bought more bitcoin at 61k 😁

[Breadman @BTCBreadMan]

When I tweeted this 4 years ago…

Bitcoin: $19,200
Ethereum $1,430

Today…

Bitcoin: $60,800 (+216%)
Ethereum: $1,562 (+9%)

What a fucking joke Ethereum is 🤣🤡

[James E. Thorne @DrJStrategy]

Bitcoin and Mungers Rule.

One has to wonder about the “AI is sucking up all the capital” narrative when nearly 8 trillion dollars still sits in money market funds earning a risk‑free yield, while fiat money loses something on the order of 8% of its purchasing power per year. In a market that noisy, the 200‑week Munger Rule is less a tactic than an x‑ray of who actually believes in compounding.

Buy at the upward sloping 200-week moving average.

Yes buy when there is blood in the streets.

But emotions get in the way.

The 200 week MA.

It marks the point where price has already done the damage and narrative has followed it down, where momentum, flows and sentiment have all turned against you, and where long-term value quietly reasserts itself. Narrative follows price.

When you should buy, you will not want to. The same is true of selling ( yes sell parabolic moves).

The excess return is therefore not informational. It is behavioural.
Most investors cannot do it. Emotions get in the way, simple human aversion to loss turn volatility into something to be avoided rather than harvested.

I call it the Munger Rule.

Have a nice day.

[HumblePleb @humblepleb__]

@2040yyds Lol 这是永恒熊市

[HumblePleb @humblepleb__]

@zkgoudan 不要活在自己的幻想里，人家实话实说你就接受不了，你非要人家昧着良心说永恒牛市永远热泪盈眶么，能否不要这么天真，低价正是你吸筹的良机你究竟在抱怨什么

[HumblePleb @humblepleb__]

@Royrennt 都2026年了还在问为什么硬起来，这不是一贯的套路砸BTC买ETH托高汇率，造成短暂的“硬”的假象

[HumblePleb @humblepleb__]

@twan618 @BTCBreadMan Wrong, 6 years ago they hold 0 BTC, now they hold 800k+ BTC

[Bitcoin for Freedom @BTC_for_Freedom]

They will not announce the collapse of the dollar. There will be no press conference. No emergency broadcast. You’ll just notice that everything costs more. Your savings buy less. And by the time it’s obvious to everyone, the exit will be crowded.

[『華』「胡翌霖」 @epr510]

我早前解释过，简单来说就是很多人宁可要所谓「现金流」吃利息，也不要涨幅更高的无息资产。这部分人本来是比特币本位的阻碍， @saylor 天才地把他们变成燃料。举个例子：有人坚持1.13大于1.8，那么我就让他给我1.8块我给他1.13块，如此重复直到他脑子转过来或者钱包被掏空。赛勒就是我给你现金流，换你帮我买比特币，如此重复，直到大家的脑子都从生息逻辑转向比特币本位，或者大家的钱包都被掏空，无论哪种，比特币本位就实现了。https://t.co/Q6mALqeQzj

[HumblePleb @humblepleb__]

@PhyrexNi 这不很简单嘛，跟散户借钱屯币是一样的，赌的是比特币的长期上涨空间。 卖1个币可以买回10-20个币这买卖还看不懂么 而且BTC年平均上涨3%就可以无限这样执行。 更别提熊市屯币了，给20%年化都不亏

[HumblePleb @humblepleb__]

@HodlMagoo so bitcoin is not as transparent as Dalio think

[HumblePleb @humblepleb__]

@quarktalksss 美股 一般般， 不如#bitcoin

[Bitcoin Archive @BitcoinArchive]

SAYLOR: “Every academic before Bitcoin never understood what money was.”

[HumblePleb @humblepleb__]

@epr510 @nangongyuan 这段回应堪称对那些大区块党半桶水的降维打击

[Pledditor @Pledditor]

IMO this Arbitrum incident was a real eye opener for shitcoiners

I tweeted "the bitcoin maxis were right", and I'd estimate only ~40% of the likes came from bitcoin twitter. The majority of likes came from shitcoiners, and among them were dozens of high profile industry players.

[HumblePleb @humblepleb__]

@sunyuchentron 波场这么快达成共识不正因为它是一个绝对中心化的链吗 升级出错了也可以改回来，风险可控