Hans-Jørgen

Frontend Developer but mainly a procrastinator.

[Hans-Jørgen @Hyvelez]

@TODNewsHub They should be building something that dosen't look soul crushing and ugly. This is a good example https://t.co/G1mLfHT21y

[FINMAN @erikfinman]

How about you built an actual good design instead of Millennial Minimalist Slop?

[Hans-Jørgen @Hyvelez]

@parametricarch Looks like a bomb went off there.

[Hans-Jørgen @Hyvelez]

@Itsfoss Nasty...

[Hans-Jørgen @Hyvelez]

@newyorkcityfc Nasty

[Hans-Jørgen @Hyvelez]

@JoshuaBarzon KJV, but LSB and NASB or NKJV would also be fine.

[Jeremy Carl @realJeremyCarl]

I'm going to keep posting this Alstair Begg clip "The Man on the Middle Cross" (less than four minutes in length) every Holy Week, because its message is true in 2026, it will be true in 2036 and it will be true in 3036.

"If i take my eyes off the cross, I can then give only lip service to its efficacy while at the same time living as if my salvation depends upon me.

And as soon as you go there it will lead you either to abject despair or a horrible kind of arrogance.

And it is only the cross of Christ that deals both with the dreadful depths of despair and the pretentious arrogance of the pride of man that says you know, I can figure this out."

[Hans-Jørgen @Hyvelez]

@Mighty_MichMich @its_The_Dr He is covering up for abuse and sex-offenders. And let's not forget that he and Bethel are mixing new-age with christianity.

[Hans-Jørgen @Hyvelez]

@j49576 @its_The_Dr He is covering up for abuse and sex-offenders. And let's not forget that he and Bethel are mixing new-age with christianity.

[Hans-Jørgen @Hyvelez]

@HwsEleutheroi Spent many nights under 0°F in this thing.

[Josh Barzon @JoshuaBarzon]

The entire Book of Revelation is a giant chiasm. 🤯

A chiasm is a literary device where ideas unfold in order (A B C) and then repeat in reverse (C B A), forming an X shaped symmetry that aids memory and draws attention to the central point (C).

The Bible is amazing.

[Malin @MlleMalin]

EU går mot et eget lukket internett av samme type som Kina har. Hvor man kun skal slippe gjennom "trygg EU-godkjent" informasjon. Det bekreftes i et dokument fra EU-parlamentet.

[Hans-Jørgen @Hyvelez]

@ryolu_ @cursor_ai If this was a Linux distro, it would become my main distro immediately!

[Ryo Lu @ryolu_]

consistency ≠ uniformity:

for those who haven't lived through this era – we used to have beautiful, precision interfaces. now they're replaced by a design language that originated from the Apple Watch, with icons that only fit in squircles. but that's not even the point.

the point is we used to design the whole stack – the technology, the concepts, the interfaces. when designers only care about superficial consistency, platforms lose their uniqueness.

apple used to design systems. skeuomorphism wasn't just about leather textures – it was about teaching people new mental models. the trash can empties because you understand what a trash can does. aqua's lickable buttons and sheets had depth because the OS had layers you could understand. the old apple designed the whole stack – from metal to pixels to concepts. teams weren't just shipping features in the same box, they were building coherent platforms each with opinions about what computing should feel like for the medium.

liquid glass is fine on a phone. but on macOS it's unusable – lack of precision, visual noise everywhere. this is what happens when UI language designed for fingers bleed into macOS. we went from interfaces designed for a 27" cinema display with a precise cursor to interfaces designed for a 1.5" screen you tap with one finger.

the Mac is for creation and precision work. it needs information density. it needs chrome you can grab. it needs UI that gets out of your way but gives you power when you need it. instead we got padding and whitespace and translucent blurs optimized for touch targets nobody's touching.

the squircle icon mandate is a symptom. when you force every icon into the same shape, you're saying "brand consistency" matters more than "each app icon needs to communicate its function instantly." we traded clarity for uniformity. we traded precise design for cross-platform sameness.

consistency means your system has coherent rules within itself. uniformity means everything looks the same regardless of context.

the hardware team still gets it – that macbook pro + M-series chips, chef's kiss. but software design feels like it's chasing fat fingers instead of remembering what people do on a Mac.

[Dr. Eggen ⦻ @Dr_Eggen]

EN KVINNE HAR
- saget av seg puppene
- sagt hun er mann
- fått egg fra annen kvinne
- blitt befrukta NØYAKTIG som en husdyrku
- flytta inn med to menn
≠ alle tre kaller seg nå «FAR»

NFI ga 2,8 millioner
(skattepengene dine, ja)
NRK kjøpte filmen
Pressen kaller den «varm» og «modig»
- kun terningkast 4, 5, 6

Midt i dette
finnes det faktisk
et levende
pustende
BARN

Med:
- ukjent mor (donor)
- ukjent far (hemmelig)
- ingen slekt
- ingen valg
= INGENTING

bortsett fra:
tre polyvoksne
et filmcrew
og et statsautorisert apparat
som kaller det «kjærlighet»

I et land med ekte presse
ville minst ÉN stemme spurt om det eneste som faktisk betyr noe:
Hva i helvete er dette barnet født inn i?

Men her?
INGEN spør.

For ALLE vet at spørsmålet er FORBUDT
- ikke juridisk
- men psykologisk
- drevet av frykt
- straffet med sosial død
= total selvsensur
= pressefriheten er illusjon

Mange vil kalle denne teksten:
hat

men ALT du har lest til nå
= dokumenterbar fakta

Og snart—-
vil sannheten du nettopp leste
bli stemplet som HATPRAT
og forbudt ved lov

IKKE for å beskytte barnet
men for å beskytte fortellingen
om barnet

Og da er vi fremme:
Biologi = hat
Virkeligheten = forbudt

så vet du hva?
FUCK DET DER
DEN EKTE HATPRATEN STARTER NÅ:

DU
VET at det ikke er normalt.
Du VET at barnet ikke har «tre fedre»
Du VET at hele dritten er iscenesatt

DU.
VET.

Hva tror du skjer nå?
At NRK angrer?
At de tenker:
«oi shit, dette ble litt mye - vi stopper her»?

Tosk.

Når NRK kjøper en film
så er det ikke nachspiel
= men VORSPIEL

Dette ER veien inn i NRK Skole og læreplanen.

Ikke «kanskje». Ikke «hvis».
MEN SNART
- sannsynligvis 2026

Og da?

jo—
da skal ungen din se
tre menn som kaller seg pappa.
Mor finnes ikke
for det ordet er sletta
fra manus.

(hvis du tviler:
forrige transfilm fra samme regissør
er allerede godt implementert)

DETTE skjer
ikke på tross av deg
men PÅ GRUNN AV DEG

for du VET hva som skjer
men du sier INGENTING
- på jobb
- studie
- i familieselskapet
- foreldremøtet
= OVERALT

Og barna du nekter å beskytte?
De vil vokse opp og spørre:
«hvorfor sa du ikke noe?»

og du må svare:
«jeg ville bare ikke skape dårlig stemning»

Når historien skrives vil du være den som
«bare gjorde som du fikk beskjed om»

= historien tilgir ikke
= det vil heller ikke barna
= de vil leve i konsekvensene DIN feighet

OG DE VIL HATE DEG FOR DET

[Offseason Mode @Ferd_Turgeson]

Dude looks pretty good for 33yrs old

[Hans-Jørgen @Hyvelez]

@JoshuaBarzon NASB?

[Hans-Jørgen @Hyvelez]

@espenteigen @Raudt støtter dere dette?

[Hans-Jørgen @Hyvelez]

@EuroDale @Raudt er dette greit?

[Ramin Nasibov @RaminNasibov]

Hyundai revives its classic Pony into an electric car

[Hans-Jørgen @Hyvelez]

@wylfcen "veg" means road in Norwegian.