@jassemkhelifi5@Bd_irB_ll how is a 32 team tournament perfect in terms of quality, there are so called “bad footballing nations” that exist in them. that only gets worse the bigger the tournament gets
@jassemkhelifi5@Bd_irB_ll but you do understand that these the trade off you have to make, you can’t just keep extending it and extending it until every team in the world can play. it’s also not a charity, if you’re good enough you’ll make it
@jassemkhelifi5@Bd_irB_ll because i said, i think 32 is the sweet spot where there is a good amount of quality and some less skilled nations. also as for the eye test, that same point can just keep being made till we’re at 256 teams lad.
@Paradoxtoxical@Bd_irB_ll europe is so far ahead of the other countries that they’ll never catch up i’m afraid. 10/15 years it’ll become equal 😂😂😂😂😂 mate look at brazil, they used to have r9 and now they have igor thiago.
@jassemkhelifi5@Bd_irB_ll so then why not make it 256 team tournament. the more teams you add the more likely the worse teams that’ll enter, it’s very simple. how it was done at qatar was perfect with a fair allocation based on the strength of each continents footballing strength
@camjacl@itsetgl@tosinmm_ i wouldn’t care who was here if it was the same format as it was in 2022, great mix. of good and bad, less games on the players, less wait between your country playing. what’s not to like. if its storylines that you crave then why stop at 48, and not want 256 teams at WC2030
@jassemkhelifi5@Bd_irB_ll wait why stop at 64? let’s go to 256 and get rid of qualification as a whole. mediocre european teams😂 mate the top 9 teams based on odds, 7 are european.
@jassemkhelifi5@Bd_irB_ll oh okay so it’s not europe’s first win, nice 👌i don’t even care about the amount of european teams there are could be for 3 for all i care , it’s just 32 teams is far better