The over-cautious arguing with the reckless.
The hypersensitive arguing with the grossly offensive.
The "everyone should share everything" crowd arguing with the "everything should be mine" crowd."
Happening at the micro and macro level.
A Marketplace of bad ideas.
@RonFilipkowski Quakers already fled England to be able to practice their beliefs without Government influence.
It's like, you know, the beginning of what even *waves hands* all this, is.
@hankgreen@danzwku Think about it, Hank. X is like real life.
The Music store, Time Square, I'll bet my local library conspires with Amazon.
Maybe some of us are looking for -not- real life. Life without planned obsolescence and emotional marketing.
Good faith conversation, humility.
@hankgreen Housing is an ever changing target (families grow shrink and move) AND we "promise" independence. "Air bnb" with cleaning and maintenance robots, all electric with solar.
And, very important, free/low cost transportation to migrate.
@jbarro That's an existential question.
It's the physical that HAS to be categorized.
Take urology vs. gynecology, for example. Jail and prison could be undue burden on an inmate. If acceptance is unquestioned, then the malevolent will capitalize.
@maggieNYT@jonathanvswan Begs the question, will there be no more FBI or Secret Service visits for openly threatening the "wrong" people?
Staunch "free speech" advocate Musk and a guy who may pardon J6rs who some called for you know what to you know who.
Red hats vs anons
@spicyoptimist @esjesjesj It's always OK to take out a fascist.
First amendment: Freedom to call out a fascist.
Second amendment: Freedom to defend against fascism.
@Chris_arnade Spin?
This is real deal authoritarian, minority rule we're facing.
How does it feel to be educated and watch your family and countrymen become "educated" by entertaining propaganda?
It may not be nice to judge people for ignorance, but willful idiocy?
Fuck. Fuck this.
Saying the United States is a Christian nation is so ridiculous.
It's maddening.
It's like saying, "that river is the Sun."
I mean, like, yea, kinda, but in another way, they're kinda the exact opposite.
Last tweet being said, the onus of child support, then, should be paternity based for the not pregnant, but non paternity based for the queen.
Queens are nessesaily parents, but parents aren't nessesaily queens
Two categories of human. Those who have been pregnant and those who have not.
Those who are pregnant are queens. Rules do not apply in the same way.
Not that there are no rules, we need to protect our queen.
Motherhood is in and of itself. There is no equivalent.
@MuncieKantz@FOX59 WHAT??
He literally ran as a Republican and still is. Read the damned article.
Unsurprisingly, he's a Trump supporter.
Breaking laws to point to how laws get broken, Reichtag voting fraud, if you will.