A transparent marketplace would be better at this rate imo.
Skills accrue to auditors.
Reputation accrues to firms.
Clients see a โtop-tierโ firm and think theyโll get a good audit which is not necessarily true.
Who audits is so much important than what firm they are from.
Firms are in some cases just expensive wrappers since many SRs are on contractual basis anyway.
I think we have an on going problem in the industry with big brand audit shops and perceptions around reputation, quality and pricing.
We're just going to end up with a big-4, KPMG / EY / Deloitte style consolidation if nothing gets done.
I think the root cause issue is that reputation is accruing to firms, whereas skills accrue to the auditors.
Big brand firms obviously invest a lot into business development, and also use fear and reputation to sell - They offer "Elite Security"!
Clients then hire based on firm reputation, or desire for rubber stamps. They undervalue who actually audits, despite that being critical to audit quality i.e. If I get an audit from company XYZ, then it must be good!
I know Zenith solve this with their hiring approach but the issue persists industry-wide regardless...
Then the firms develop backlogs which compromise quality and clients complain about price + quality.
And in many cases the firms are essentially expensive wrappers since the auditors are contractor-based anyway.
Then from the auditor side, if you're relatively unknown you gotta compete for questionable EV in competitions &/or bounty hunt like a savage. Getting actual client work is difficult, and project leads are already hounded by audit shop BD people.
I find being independent and maintaining independence as an auditor very difficult. Maybe it's a skill issue, but I have some performance evidence to suggest otherwise.
One idea I've been thinking about is a marketplace where each warden sets their own day rate including incentives for medium and high
They then auction their time in fixed 1 to 3 month time-blocks, or clients can hire, or assemble teams of auditors based on those who are available.
Maybe it's a terrible idea. Perhaps no one wants to show their day rates. Perhaps it fails because of perception of quality.
However, I think we should do something about the "middle class" of auditors through an open marketplace, otherwise we end up in this all or nothing situation.
The key is that skill and reputation accrue to the auditor, not the firm.
Smart contracts + ZK + AI combined allow us to experiment with a totally new form of democratic governance. Referendum-driven governments where citizens vote one-to-one, with votes executed by AIs as proxy voting servants, and ZK plus services like Venice AI for privacy.
Excellent podcast
- BRICs will settle in Gold Bricks
- The US stock market is the US economy
- PPP is "pew pew pew" ๐ซ (Purchasing Power Parity; if you have high PPP, you win the wars)
- China saves in factories (not in stocks)
- SWIFT is a v. legacy stack
and more
A few months ago, I got the opportunity to sit down with @balajis for a conversation on the @ns podcast.
We talked about a # of structural issues within macro - a full table of contents & the conversation is below; a YouTube link can be found below that. Thx for having me on!