$8m+ in sales and ai ads are doing more of the heavy lifting
the best ai creatives don’t look like ai
they look native
use familiar faces
hit one painful problem
and get to the hook instantly
the advantage isn’t just cheaper production
it’s testing 20 angles while a human team is still making 3
i broke down the ai ad system behind creatives like this
rt + comment “ai” and i’ll send it
(follow for dm)
$390k+ beauty brands aren’t winning with better ads
they’re winning with ads that don’t look like ads at all
ai beauty creatives blend into the feed so naturally
they feel like advice, routines, or everyday content
no loud branding
no overproduced intros
no forced selling
just real-looking moments
product in hand
natural lighting
a message that feels like something you’d actually stop to watch
ai isn’t being used to invent crazy new concepts
it’s used to spot what already holds attention
lock the structure
and reproduce it at scale without losing authenticity
that’s why these ads keep working longer than traditional creatives
they don’t interrupt the scroll
they move with it
this is where beauty advertising is going
quiet
repeatable
and extremely hard to compete with if you don’t understand the system
i broke down the full framework behind these ai beauty ads
rt + comment “beauty” and i’ll send it
(follow for dm)
@maciekl_ Now imagine the other way around. A dtc guy gets a reality check when he realizes how much effort it takes to sell the outcome, the dream, the promise.. All the stories and nurturing needed to trigger someone to buy coaching will make the dtc guy cry
@maciekl_ Option 1 for sure. Imagine the relief going from trying to convince someone to buy something intangible to something that actually exists physically
$370k in revenue didn’t come from “better copy”
It came from realizing AI ads aren’t about convincing anymore
they’re about camouflaging into the feed
No logos
No glossy openers
No obvious selling
Just clips that look like education
warnings
or comment replies you’d normally stop for
AI isn’t there to brainstorm magic ideas
It’s there to spot what already stops scrolls
extract the structure
and multiply it without losing the edge
That’s why these creatives last longer than traditional ads
They don’t break the feed
They belong inside it
This is where modern advertising is going
quiet
systematic
and brutal if you don’t understand it
I broke down how these AI creatives are built and scaled
rt + comment “patterns” and I’ll send it
(follow for dm)
Meta reports that partnership ads deliver 19% lower CPAs and 13% higher CTRs on average vs standard brand ads.
That’s why the most advanced Meta accounts are now allocating 20–50% of spend to partnership ads as a core growth lever.
So we’ve just released our Partnership Ads Playbook (Updated for 2026) built off what we’re seeing actually scale inside Meta accounts right now.
Inside, we break down:
- Why partnership ads outperform (and why it’s not about creators or follower count)
- How Meta actually interprets identity, creative, and signals
- The creative diversity multiplier and how identity unlocks incremental reach
- Benchmarks for CPA, CTR, FTI, frequency, and what “good” really looks like
- When to use founders, team members, existing creators, or persona pages
- How to source creators using Meta’s own tools (without wasting time in DMs)
- What to brief creators so content performs and still feels native
- Exact setup flows inside Ads Manager (including dynamic identity)
- Contract terms, usage rights, and what to negotiate (so you don’t get burned later)
- A full measurement framework to know what to scale, what to kill, and when
- Real examples from brands doing this well and why they work
Want it?
Retweet this post
Comment “partnership” and I’ll send it over