This is an incredibly important consideration. These decisions (and AD itself) never happen in a vacuum but within the culture they are enacted in...
Disgust in Dying – BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care - https://t.co/b7KrOssAy7
@JasonD60@werhln@kesleeman You truly have no understanding of the nature of conversations, vulnerabilities, or pressures at the end of life. You can't (or wont) see the dangers. You ignore any evidence that doesn't agree with your thinking by undermining the person saying it, or changing the subject. Bye
@JasonD60@werhln@kesleeman You clearly haven't little understanding of the either the literature or the nuances of caring for vulnerable patients at the end of life. You malign doctors for the LCP yet trust them for AD. It makes no sense at all.
@JasonD60@werhln@kesleeman I know that you are flexible on the principle of collateral deaths if AD comes in. Remember the LCP was removed when problems arose. Would the same happen with ZAD legislation?
@JasonD60@werhln@kesleeman Wrong. It is centred around choice some patients, not others. As you have indicated in the past I know you are prepared to accept collateral damage to get this through. Others who are pro AD have had the courage to acknowledge this. I just don't think that is acceptable.
@JasonD60@werhln@kesleeman A rounded look at the evidence will tell you that AD, without proper funding for and access to Palliative Care, many patients will have no choice at all. In addition dead patients have no choice about changing their minds when it goes wrong.
@JasonD60 Sorry. I have been busy. Palliative doesn't do more harm than good. If evidence suggested otherwise then I would definitely consider my position.
But returning to my question. What methodology do you think undermines the poll you referenced?
A further increase in AD in Netherlands. I'm sure we've been told that this could never happen in the UK.... is that naivety or hubris? Whatever it is, it is not reality.