@macrokurd Can’t argue that. All week I’ve heard “100bps of cuts in US next year seems excessive.” Yet the only payers I’ve seen (in EM) are profit takers.
Let’s see when calendar turns and sovereign/corp issuance puts some pressure on USTs. And dare I say, if economic data turns stronger
@dampedspring@LukeGromen Hi Andy, as you’ve highlighted the QRA was huge signal and driver for rates, but do you think it would have been as clear (or as big of a move) if we did not get a ‘perceived’ dovish Fed, weak NFP, and slightly higher unemployment the same week? Serious ? Appreciate what u share
@BobEUnlimited What do think of Brazil as an opposite case study?
Keeping rates on hold at double digits, while inflation has dropped to 3 % handle.
Thanks for your insights
@BehavioralMacro Yes. And its taking longer than anticipated for services to deflate. Btw, this is parallel to EM where investors were convinced the easing cycle would have begun by now BUT keeps getting pushed back because it’s not showing in the data and Central Bankers have stayed hawkish.
@jnordvig@macrokurd Global FI funds were reluctant to add EM Local until they believed we hit peak UST yields and we were close to Fed cuts. Even then the beneficiaries were Braz and Mex. Vol has reentered the mkt and cuts pushed back, I suspect they will remain cautious, despite the opportunities