RIDWAN

SURVEYOR

[RIDWAN @ibnrosheed1]

@azaarbroni @_JefFCB @grok I give up, Ñow I believe all Ronaldo fans are just clueless.
So scoring will guarantee 3 points right?
Take a good look at Chelsea and man city this season how did scoring and not defending profited them.
Of all the goals and 3 points why is he not the most successful footballer?

[RIDWAN @ibnrosheed1]

@azaarbroni @_JefFCB @grok You see how smart you are for calling people foolish, scoring goal is not the only purpose of playing football, correct.
But what about creating, defending or stopping it. Football would have been horrible if every player is obsessed with scoring goals. Above all, Messi clears.✌️

[RIDWAN @ibnrosheed1]

@Pamilerin The Flash

[RIDWAN @ibnrosheed1]

@Gabriazo Juan mata

[RIDWAN @ibnrosheed1]

@_offside18 Between øzil and silva

[👳🏾‍♂️Mufti Of Ilorin Online 👳🏾‍♂️ @Adamthallith]

Muyiwa, my brother. Thank you for this question. May God bless you. Āmīn.

First and foremost, in Islam, anyone who unjustly kills another person is committing one of the gravest sins in the religion. The fact that such a person identifies as a Muslim, recites Islamic supplications, or shouts the name of Allah does not make the act Islamic or permissible. This is not merely my personal opinion; it is firmly established in Islamic teachings.

Regarding Boko Haram, I am not going to deny their identification with Islam. The founder of Boko Haram, Mohammed Yusuf, was a Muslim from Borno State. So, if we are discussing whether they have claimed an Islamic identity, the answer is yes. But there is an important distinction we must make: a person can identify as a Muslim and still commit acts that Islam explicitly prohibits. Likewise, a Christian can identify as a Christian and still commit acts that Christianity condemns. The actions of an individual or group should therefore not automatically be attributed to the religion they claim to follow.

Boko Haram members and other criminals who kill, kidnap and terrorise innocent people are not doing so because Islam commanded them to. They are acting upon their own misguided ideology, criminal interests, political motives, greed, or other personal objectives. Their actions should be judged against the teachings of Islam, not used to define Islam itself.

One of the clearest ways to understand Islam’s position on murder, kidnapping, banditry and terrorism is to look at the punishments and obligations prescribed by Islamic law.

For example, Islam recognises Diyah, commonly translated into English as “blood money.” In cases of accidental or unintentional killing, the Qur’an prescribes compensation to the victim’s family. In today’s Nigerian currency, the exact monetary value of Diyah is ₦805,724,000. This is if you’ll kill someone by mistake. Not just that, you have to free a slave, but in today’s society that we don’t have slaves again, you have to observe 60 days of fasting. And importantly, the prohibition against unjustly taking human life is not limited to Muslims, either the person you kill is a Muslim or not, as long as you the killer is a muslim, you must serve the punishment that Islam prescribe.

Now, regarding kidnapping, banditry and terrorism.

If someone commits armed violence, kills people and takes their property, the classical jurists discuss execution and crucifixion among the prescribed punishments.

If someone kills but does not take property, execution is the applicable punishment.

If someone takes people’s property through such armed violence without killing, the punishment is cutting off the hand and the opposite foot (right hand—left foot).

If someone terrorises people through armed force and weapons without killing anyone or taking their property, exile or banishment is the punishments discussed by the jurists.

If someone terrorises people without weapons, such will be jailed.

Therefore, when Boko Haram, bandits or any other armed group kidnaps innocent people, murders, steals their property and terrorises communities, it is completely wrong to suggest that they are carrying out Islamic teachings simply because they use Islamic language or identify themselves as Muslims.

Quite the opposite: the Qur’an itself condemns the very kinds of violence and corruption that they commit.

So, Boko Haram members and violent bandits may identify themselves as Muslims, but their crimes cannot be justified by Islam. A Muslim who genuinely understands his or her religion should condemn murder, kidnapping, terrorism, banditry and the unjust taking of people’s property, regardless of who commits them.

Islam is not judged by the crimes of those who claim its name. It is judged by what the Qur’an and the authentic Sunnah actually teach.

So Bokoharam are not going to heaven.

[RIDWAN @ibnrosheed1]

@TOMISINSPARK_ Mm v

[🇦🇷RestricePlanox❤️💙 @RPlanox]

Compare Cristiano Ronaldo with Kevin De Bruyne for chance creation.

Sounds ridiculous.

Compare Ronaldo with Xavi for controlling a football match.

Ridiculous.

Compare Ronaldo with Iniesta for midfield mastery.

Ridiculous.

Compare Ronaldo with Neymar for dribbling.

Compare him with Ronaldinho for creativity.

Again, ridiculous.

Because Cristiano’s argument has always lived primarily in one lane: GOALSCORING.

Now look at Messi.

Goals? Compared with Ronaldo.

Playmaking? Compared with De Bruyne.

Game control? Compared with Xavi.

Midfield genius? Compared with Iniesta.

Dribbling? Compared with Neymar and Ronaldinho.

Pure footballing genius? Compared with Maradona.

Legacy? Compared with Pelé.

Do you understand how insane that is?

Other legends are compared with Messi in the ONE thing they were historically great at.

Messi is compared with ALL of them.

One player entered the GOAT debate because of goals.

The other became the measuring stick for football itself.

That answers your non-existent GOAT debate. 🐐🇦🇷

[RIDWAN @ibnrosheed1]

@Songastic1 @Omojuwa 👌

[RIDWAN @ibnrosheed1]

@rukky_nate All the Delilahs and jezebels of this world's ancestry and genealogy can finally be traced back to someone.

[RIDWAN @ibnrosheed1]

@4kaszz Emphasis on the last word.
Na "dye" you mean, I know say you don forsake am since..

[RIDWAN @ibnrosheed1]

@Pounzydegreat01 As if the messi himself will not score the thousand goals.
Delusion fc.

[RIDWAN @ibnrosheed1]

@OginiSolomon Messi's worst year as a player probably tops Ronaldo's prime.

[RIDWAN @ibnrosheed1]

@SaujanCR7 If Consistency of prime is not a factor, Ronaldinho should be in the conversation of the GOAT debate, considering how we want to shift the post for Ronaldo's prime which obviously messi dusts him.

[RIDWAN @ibnrosheed1]

@SaujanCR7 Prime for prime messi scored 91 goals in a calendar year, what was Ronaldo's highest goal tally in a year?
How about assists?
Dribbles, take ons, trophies?
Give me a category where Ronaldo surpasses messi during their prime.

[RIDWAN @ibnrosheed1]

@the_smallie Supporting messi na great flex, you no need throwback to prove his greatness, just play anybody him current match highlights, even the blind go testify.

[RIDWAN @ibnrosheed1]

@YusufAsunmogejo In as much you're deliberately going against the Quran and the Sunnah of the prophet, you are out of the UMMAH.

[RIDWAN @ibnrosheed1]

@Nsukka_okpa As if Ronaldo conquered england with Norwich, Spain with getafe and Italy wit spezia.
Dey there dey mumu yourself, the Al nassr wey him dey na mumu players dey there na.
Tell me any player wey play with messi wey messi nor improve their playing style?
Can you say the same for CR7

[RIDWAN @ibnrosheed1]

@ThePChris @grok do your thing