I finally found an issue that the left and right can agree on.
No more Flock cameras.
No more mass surveillance.
We didn't consent to this.
We refuse to give up a little liberty for your so called safety.
You can stick your mass surveillance cameras right where the sun don't shine.
We're a Free country and we'll defend freedom at all costs.
This all a sounds like an elaborate scheme to solidify the idea that this war is about stopping iran from getting a nuke. But it’s not. But it puts this idea in people heads because now you’re read into this secret mission that you want to defend. It’s all bullshit. This war is not about iran getting a nuke.
Hello Mr. Hunter Biden,
You're getting six-digit likes on every post lately. I don't have any hope to ratio you or whatever through traditional "Hello" means.
But for those uninitiated, those who are captivated by your fake-humble persona obviously PR-engineered to capture unsuspecting disaffected Republicans:
You are not some humility, witty guy turning over a new leaf. You are the ultimate proof of nepotism, everything that the so-called "Epstein Class" is supposed to represent.
Let me explain - off the top of my head.
You were a board member of USGLC. U.S. Global Leadership Coalition. The most powerful NGO that nobody's ever heard of. Last year, I documented in several threads, how Liz Schrayer, USGLC lead, took credit for ramming through a 90 billion dollar bill for Ukraine in 2024, even as @mattvanswol demonstrated that Western North Carolina got zero help in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene because FEMA threw up their hands and said they ran out of funds.
USGLC, arguably, is the most powerful NGO that nobody has ever heard of. It includes a bunch of corporations, a bunch of nonprofit leads, and ... for some magical reason, I documented, extensively, linked, that Liz Schrayer started pursuing you in 2012. During the Obama years, when you were Biden's son. Are you a former Secretary of State? No. Are you a CEO of a Fortune 500 company? No. That puts you below the average USGLC board member, by a good tier.
So what DID get you on USGLC? The only reason: that you were the son of a sitting Vice President known for corruption, and you yourself were known for corruption.
You are not "folksy." You are the worst of the worst of the elite. Most of the elite, at least, get their credentials through Georgetown/George Washington/Harvard Kennedy. You got yours purely on nepotism. Any photographs you have of yourself at motels is proof that you are so incompetent that you waste all your money, not that you come from humble beginnings. Because others like @MarcoPolo501c3 have thoroughly documented that you benefited a great deal from your nepotism.
You even tried to bait those in with saying you prefer to keep immigration "legal" - but we all know the trap that keeps illegal immgrants here: outlaw deportations, and make every immigrant case "asylum", and magically, everyone who might've been here illegally a few years ago is legal.
You may get 175K likes on your semi-subverting, PR-designed photographs. But those of us who know, know you're fake.
https://t.co/vMml22uCbu
A USDA inspector showed up at our beef jerky processor for regular inspection and saw Nourish Food Club on the production schedule.
According to the processor, the inspector said: “I’ve had issues with Ashley before, so I’m going to find problems.”
Our beef was already processed at a USDA facility. We had the required paperwork. Yet the processor was told to put “NOT FOR SALE” on the entire batch.
• We paid our small regenerative farm partners (who spent 2 years raising the cow)
• We paid the USDA processor
• We paid the USDA jerky maker
Now the jerky can’t be sold, and we eat the loss.
This is the kind of regulatory abuse that pushes small food producers out of business.
I have some questions for modern dermatology
1. UV-B drives Vitamin D3 production, which has documented anti-tumor activity in melanocytes. Why is the molecule that suppresses tumor growth blocked by SPF 50 to the tune of 98%?
2. Why do you recommend Vitamin D supplementation, when VITAL, the largest randomized trial of its kind, showed that it had zero beneficial impact on lowering all cause mortality, whereas sun seeking behavior shows a dose dependent relationship with lowering all cause mortality?
3. Darker skin means more melanin and dramatically lower melanoma rates. Why isn’t the clinical recommendation to upregulate melanogenesis through structured circadian aligned sun exposure?
4. In situ melanoma grows faster than invasive melanoma. Mortality falls while incidence climbs. Are you detecting disease or expanding a diagnostic category?
5. Nine dermatopathologists reviewed biopsy specimens from 20 years prior and reclassified lesions originally called benign as melanoma.  If the same tissue can be called benign in one decade and malignant in the next, what exactly is the diagnostic standard being used?
6. Expert skin pathologists frequently disagree when distinguishing harmless moles from early cancer, and there is no single criteria that can confirm melanoma without doubt.  Why is a diagnosis with no definitive criteria generating a public health panic about a rising epidemic?
7. The proportion of Medicare patients biopsied annually nearly doubled between 2004 and 2017, and melanoma incidence in people over 65 doubled over the same period.  How is that a coincidence and not a direct measurement of billing behavior?
8. Dermatologists have a financial incentive to perform biopsies.  Which other disease epidemics are built on diagnostic procedures that directly revenue the diagnosing physician?
9. NRF2 is circadian controlled and governs DNA repair enzyme expression in skin cells. Circadian disruption suppresses it. Why is this absent from every melanoma etiology model?
10. DNA repair peaks at specific circadian phases. Shift workers show measurably impaired repair. Why is UV damage modeled as dose-dependent when the repair side is time-dependent?
11. Circadian disruption flattens cortisol, which degrades NK cell surveillance. Why is melanoma never framed as a failure of immune clearance rather than purely an initiation event?
12. Sunscreen use has risen over the same 40 years melanoma incidence has risen. If it blocks the causal agent, why does the intervention track with the outcome?
13. Sunscreen blocks UV-B more than UV-A. UV-B makes vitamin D. UV-A penetrates deeper and generates ROS without triggering vitamin D synthesis. What is the net biological effect of that ratio shift, plus systemic absorption of endocrine-disrupting compounds?
14. Highest sunscreen compliance populations are not lowest melanoma rate populations. Where is the dose response relationship?
15. The melanoma prevention model was built on sunburn studies of outdoor workers, then applied wholesale to a cancer that appears in places sunlight never reaches. Who signed off on that transfer?
16. Melanoma in situ is 50 times more common now than it was in 1975.  A 50x increase in a non-invasive lesion that cannot metastasize, over 50 years of rising sunscreen use. What causal model explains that?
17. An estimated 89% of white men and 85% of white women diagnosed with in situ melanoma are likely overdiagnosed.  The institution calls in situ melanoma Stage 0 cancer and treats accordingly. What is the harm calculus of treating a lesion with a 85-89% chance of never becoming dangerous?
18. Melanoma diagnoses are six times higher than 40 years ago while mortality has remained broadly stable.  Every genuine epidemic, infectious or otherwise, produces a mortality signal. Where is the mortality signal that justifies calling this an epidemic?
Any answers would be great!
So under full Republican control, the Republican controlled Senate can’t pass the Save America Act for election integrity, the House just passed a bill giving another $9 billion to Ukraine, Republicans are planning to merge our military with Israel’s military while Trump has us in another foreign war that’s costing $2 billion a day and has driven gas over $4.50, and not a single person has been held accountable for the pedo Epstein files.
From the article:
“[sect. 224 of the NDAA is] not an alliance with a talented and responsible ally that will help keep the US safe, but a trap being set by Israel and its lobby to bind our country to a state that, for all its past promise, has gone rogue.”
https://t.co/1AMAcZGjp2
@MarioNawfal no one with any critical thinking will trust these trials. Every trial, with minimal effort, you can see how they manipulate findings to sell a narrative.