Diana

A literature & 🍅-approved film critic, love exploring books, world cultures, music, art, history, etc. (langs. 🇷🇺, 🇪🇸, 🇫🇷, 🇯🇵)

[Diana @ideasonpapyrus]

"What moves me so deeply, about this little prince...is his loyalty to a flower - the image of a rose that shines through his whole being like the flame of a lamp, even when he is asleep" (Antoine de Saint-Exupery, born 29 June 1900) #AntoinedeSaintExupery #TheLittlePrince #Quote

[Diana @ideasonpapyrus]

@PublicDomainRev The rubedo stage, then. The water circle is interesting 🤔

[Une certaine idée de la France totale @FranceTotale]

« Et si nous étions ici seulement pour découvrir que l’humanité peut être aimée en tant que telle ? »

Réponse soviétique à 2001, l’Odyssée de l’espace, méditation sur l’homme, sa conscience, la vie, la mort, le ciné-club des hussards vous recommande ce soir Solaris de Tarkovski

[Scott @Havenlust]

Wheat Fields under a Cloud-Filled Sky, 1888.

Vincent van Gogh

[Roland-Garros @rolandgarros]

Mirra reaches the crown 👑

#RolandGarros

[Diana @ideasonpapyrus]

7 Great Books on Consciousness https://t.co/UhoN9E2wth #consciousness #nonfiction #humanmind #tbr #books #booklist #reading

[Diana @ideasonpapyrus]

7 Great Books on Shamanism https://t.co/Zndzqm5yCq #books #booklist #greatbooks #nonfiction #shamanism #shaman #recommendedreading #tbr #mysticism #HealingPractices

[Masterpieces of Japan @JapanTraCul]

Tiger and Dragon, by Hashimoto Gaho, 1895

[Diana @ideasonpapyrus]

@IMPERATORAUS Sincerity was also lost. Before, literature, music, art, film were not made to be "consumed" so instantly without thought. It was meant to be considered, loved, & stand the test of time. Much time, heart & soul were put into it. The feeling now, sadly - there's no need for that.

[Diana @ideasonpapyrus]

"McTeague" (1899) is a vivid tale of the corruptive power of greed set in San Francisco at the turn of the twentieth century, full review https://t.co/3fPVXcS6Zk #FrankNorris #bookreview #americanclassics #classics #americanliterature

[Diana @ideasonpapyrus]

@johnesparza82 @httplec since when read books are badges of honour to be collected like Pokémon cards? To what point is the "counting" when reading is so multidimensional and varied, and books - so diverse in their content, size, level of difficulty, etc? It makes no sense.

[Diana @ideasonpapyrus]

@httplec reading isn't a numbers' game. math is.

[Diana @ideasonpapyrus]

Thebaid (Scenes from the Lives of the Desert Fathers), 1417–1423, by Fra Angelico #Thebaid #tebaide #FraAngelico #renaissance #art #religiousart

[Une certaine idée de la France totale @FranceTotale]

« Les Bastides Blanches, c'était une paroisse de cent cinquante habitants, perchée sur la proue de l'un des derniers contreforts du massif de l'Étoile, à deux lieues d'Aubagne... »

Jean de Florette - Marcel Pagnol

[Diana @ideasonpapyrus]

"The Hunt in the Forest" by Paolo Uccello #PaoloUccello #art #renaissance #AshmoleanMuseum #Oxford

[𐙚⋆ @voidwithverses]

“You know, we thank some people for merely living at the same time as we do.
I thank you for the fact that I met you, that I will remember you for all my life.”

— Dostoevsky. White Nights

[Ihtesham Ali @ihtesham2005]

A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper.

Her name is Audrey van der Meer.

She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth.

The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time.

Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen.

Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task.

When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once.

The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected.

When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely.

Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG.

Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events.

The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem.

Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next.

Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve.

Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews.

Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad.

Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page.

A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched.

The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall.

The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down.

The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page.

That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it.

Two studies. Two countries. Same answer.

Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast.

Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth.

You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick.

The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew.

Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.

[Diana @ideasonpapyrus]

@joydivision 🙏

[Diana @ideasonpapyrus]

"Tristana" is an elegant, character-driven romantic drama by one of the greatest Spanish authors https://t.co/Mk9d2PqFTy #readingaroundtheworld #bookreview #books #BenitoPérezGaldós #Tristana #libros

[Diana @ideasonpapyrus]

@Caol_MacCormaic Who is in Lynch's "posthumous cult"? If there is a director who never needed his own death to suddenly become popular, surely it is David Lynch.

[Diana @ideasonpapyrus]

@Caol_MacCormaic No one, & I mean no one will be against Mulholland Drive finding itself at top of the list. That movie achieved greatness while Lynch was still alive. At the rate we're going in cinema, we now got genuine fears that spot will be taken by something close to new Snow White.