News networks served a purpose when information was slow and expensive. They informed people and knew that their (apparent) integrity was the bedrock of their existence. When clicks became the currency they were forced to compromise some of that integrity in order to compete 🧵
@DrNice2026 Let’s not insult the reader. They can read and scroll. You said Recombivax’s label is incomplete and that there were licensure studies not listed on it. You said Plotkin was wrong when talking about Recombivax. I asked for your evidence, you sent a link about Recombivax
@DrNice2026@VincentCCPhilly@PattyMurray@SenWhitehouse@SenSanders@SenBillCassidy I read every source you sent. When I proved that none of your sources supported your point you tried moving the goal post and pretended like you were talking about engerix the entire time when you yourself sent a link to resources about Recombivax
@Alec_Zeck Also the current “safe” limit for Al adjuvant is 850 µg per dose. That number was made up completely arbitrarily, as it was simply the amount already being used when the rule was written.
@alrightyman@joshmcgoo It’s ironic that the people who claim to be “science first” will do anything but point you to the science supporting their stance. I know it doesn’t exist, but it’s wild to watch the hypocrisy.