sv @idontknoww__18 - Twitter Profile

วิธีโกง #เอเชียนเกมส์ ของ #ญี่ปุ่น !! ▪️ให้นักกีฬารอที่สนามบิน 10 กว่าชั่วโมง ไม่มีอาหาร ▪️ ไม่มีรถมารับ จีนติดสนามบิน 6 ชั่วโมง ให้หารถมารับเอง จ่ายเอง ▪️ทีมฟุตบอลเกาหลีใต้ แข่งเสร็จ รถมารับไม่เพียงพอ คนขับหลงทาง ช้าไปอีก 30 นาที ▪️นักกีฬานอนรอห้องพักที่พื้น ด้วยความอ่อนล้า ▪️จัดอาหารให้นักกีฬาน้อย !!

177

27K

30K

2K

3M

Who to follow

Onwards and Upwards !!! Dreamer Maybe Achiever

h.

@flawlessmessx

everything, in time.

idontknoww__18 retweeted

Hims 🪷 🚴 🌱 🧘

@maveinlux

about 2 months ago

At some point, someone has to respond to this garbage, so allow me @priyankac19 and excuse my French, but what the fuck @ReallySwara ? Jauhar was not a TED Talk about chastity. It was not a family honour killing. It was not a rape survivor being told to die. It was women looking at a breached fort and an incoming force whose habit, on the record, was to convert the women of a defeated court into harem stock. Kamala Devi of Gujarat did not “move on.” She was taken. Deval Devi was taken later and passed through that court like loot with a pulse. That is the second room in the house you keep deleting so your question can sound holy. “Does a rape survivor not deserve to live after rape?” Yes. In 2026. With a phone, a statute, a court, a hospital, a city to run to. Congratulations on discovering the Indian Constitution. Now explain what that sentence has to do with women who had already lost the state. There was no FIR against Khalji. There was no Delhi to escape to. There was no climax dance where the vice-chancellor gets shamed and the credits roll. The state was the rapist. You are comparing a woman who can still leave the room to women whose room was the last room. You shouted “chii” at a pregnant belly and decided the film was saying a girl child should not be born because a Muslim king might rape her. That is not analysis. That is you stuffing your column into someone else’s uterus. The shot is a woman who knows the child will not be born into a family. It will be born into inventory. You turned a funeral into a communal talking point and called the funeral the problem. Then you asked what we are choosing to glorify. Fine. Let’s use your scale. You spent a career demanding that cinema stare at female sexuality without flinching. In Veere Di Wedding the country was asked to sit through you with a vibrator while your on-screen husband walked in. You defended it. You said it should shock people into laughter, not disgust. You said women are more than their private parts, in the same breath as the scene that made your private parts the poster. When you put sex on screen, it is agency. When Rajput women refuse to hand their sex to the men who just killed their city, you felt “reduced to a vagina.” That letter was not a theory of personhood. It was a tantrum about which vagina the camera is allowed to serve. You keep saying the film tells survivors they are cowards for living. No. You are telling dead women they are cowards for refusing a harem. That is the inversion. A survivor who lives today is not a coward. A woman who walked into fire rather than become a concubine of the man who sacked her fort was not a coward either. Both things can be true because they are not the same event. You flattened them on purpose. A flattened event is easier to moralise. It is also a lie. Nobody is asking modern India to revive jauhar. The film carried a disclaimer. History is allowed to be shown as history. What you want is a rule that the only permitted female death on screen is the kind that flatters your politics, and the only permitted female sex is the kind that flatters your brand. So here is the actual simple question, since you asked for one: When the choices are ash or a lifetime as sexual property of the men who just finished the massacre, and some women choose ash; who is the barbarian? The women in the fire, or the commentator in Delhi calling them a bad message for rape statistics? You don’t get to loot their context, rename their refusal “chastity culture,” and then pose as the only adult in the room who cares whether survivors live. Survivors should live. The women in that scene were trying not to become the next consignment. If that distinction is too fine for you, the problem is not Padmaavat. The problem is that you need history to be a poster.

103

3K

856

293

147K

idontknoww__18 retweeted

Ankii💗

@ankiiverse

3 months ago

“I will not give birth to a life that will discriminate against my gender. My own flesh and blood must not become a blade and turn against me. If the world born from my body oppresses me I will not let that world exist.”

60

35K

7K

3K

630K

idontknoww__18 retweeted