Ignatius existed

sweet like sugar hard like ice

[Ignatius existed @ignatiusexisted]

@pomsrule5 lol this is a stupid comment lol. So it the Apostle Matthew says something you don't listen to it because of Paul?

[Ignatius existed @ignatiusexisted]

@DrShayPhD @BishopJaxi Because you are retarded and distort scripture.

[Ignatius existed @ignatiusexisted]

@MJKelleyII Falacies in this post include: false equivalence, strawman, question begging, and selective history.....also just flat out incorrect information on what Paul corrected Peter on.

[Ignatius existed @ignatiusexisted]

@MJKelleyII Paul didn't correct “Peter’s false teachings.” This is a public rebuke of personal inconsistency and fear-driven hypocrisy in practice, not a correction of doctrinal error that Peter was teaching.

[Ignatius existed @ignatiusexisted]

@ScubaDocJMP @Samuel43750453 Who are you talking to?

[Ignatius existed @ignatiusexisted]

@CathSteelMan @AnsweringRCs

[Ignatius existed @ignatiusexisted]

@DrShayPhD Great rebuttal 🙄

[Ignatius existed @ignatiusexisted]

@DrShayPhD Lol this is retarded and a straw man.

[Ignatius existed @ignatiusexisted]

@BIG_SGT_D This group is not Catholic they're a heretical group that says they are.

[Ignatius existed @ignatiusexisted]

@RedeemedEph1v7 @BIG_SGT_D You're retarded.

[Ignatius existed @ignatiusexisted]

@Faith_Not_Fear_ @JohnMB69 3) So the question isn’t “what scripture says all branches are born again?”
The real question is: what scripture allows you to redefine “in me” as “never actually in me”?

[Ignatius existed @ignatiusexisted]

@Faith_Not_Fear_ @JohnMB69 2) Your view requires the text to mean the opposite of what it says: that these people were never truly in Christ, even though Jesus explicitly says they are “in me” and then get removed.

[Ignatius existed @ignatiusexisted]

@Faith_Not_Fear_ @JohnMB69 1) "Every branch in me that does not bear fruit he takes away" He calls them branches in Him. Not “professors who were never in Him.” Not “false converts who only looked attached.” Branches that are actually in the vine.

[Ignatius existed @ignatiusexisted]

@Samuel43750453 This is a false dilemma. Acting as if a title cannot be both Christological and Marian. It is both, because the Person she bore is God. And again what church teaching teaches that Mary is a Goddess. Your argument is nothing but a logical fallacy.

[Ignatius existed @ignatiusexisted]

@Samuel43750453 I do every Sunday, I've not been to a Catholic Church that denies it, and I attend many different parishes due to travel. This is another straw man.

[Ignatius existed @ignatiusexisted]

@Samuel43750453 You created a straw-man meme what do you think? Can you show church teaching that says Mary is a Goddess?

[Ignatius existed @ignatiusexisted]

@Faith_Not_Fear_ @JohnMB69 You said they were never saved. The text calls them branches in the vine that get removed. If they were never truly attached, the warning is meaningless.
If they were attached, then “never saved” doesn’t hold. Pick one.

[Ignatius existed @ignatiusexisted]

@Faith_Not_Fear_ @JohnMB69 If it was never truly attached, why does the text treat it as a real branch that can be removed? That empties the warning of meaning.