@meidididi@imuru_danansun it was a "controlled development" that was abandoned formally within the decade and in practice was rarely actually enforced, because it is an illogical way to develop the productive forces
@meidididi@imuru_danansun its also not useful in china because methods used to suppress the early development of capitalism do not lend themselves to progressing past it in its current form
@meidididi@imuru_danansun in the same chapter of capital that this comes from marx also references such limits stemming from the guilds of the middle ages, not exactly the best practice for a dotp to employ
@JohnAltman71213 @grain99806254@boreddeleuzian im not attacking the foundations of determinism because im a compatibilist. im not providing a positive argument for libertarianism just stating how your negative argument against it fails. no serious compatibilist in the last 20 years has even needed to rely on the problem luck
@JohnAltman71213 @grain99806254@boreddeleuzian do you see how you are not actually making an argument against libertarianism? you are just stating your position which they disagree with, not proving that its true.
@JohnAltman71213 @grain99806254@boreddeleuzian if they have increased reasoning, and their decisions are based on this reasoning rather than on pure impulse, is that not impulse control?
@JohnAltman71213 @grain99806254@boreddeleuzian would you not agree that a ten year old at least appears to have more impulse control than a 2 year old?
@lucaspcdias 2. free will is the ability to act freely
3. compatibilism is the position that determinism and compatibilism can coexist, and free will exists
4. libertarianism is the position that determinism and free will can not exist, and free will exists
@JohnAltman71213 @grain99806254@boreddeleuzian all in all im not arguing on behalf of libertarians, compatibilism is much more intuitive to me, but i think the problem of present luck or any negative argument against libertarianism is a red herring since a positive argument for compatibilism is all thats needed
@JohnAltman71213 @grain99806254@boreddeleuzian over time, as we develop and make more decisions, our power over our impulses becomes stronger. sure, many people are entirely beholden to their "nature", but libertarians dont need to argue that *every* action is free, just that there is the possibility of *a* free action
@lucaspcdias also i think you are confusing compatibilism with libertarianism. compatibilists do not require the ability to do otherwise because the belief is that free will and determinism can coexist
@lucaspcdias they do not have to be aware of the constraints, but the constraints have to have an impact on the decision making. a gun to my head only makes my decision not free if it changes how i would decide.