ChatGPT is great at answering questions. It's terrible at teaching you something over weeks.
Draft & Arc builds you a full personalized course on anything:
• Notes & highlights
• Study-time tracking
• AI voice tutor
• Feynman-style feedback
Try https://t.co/aisYizT73W
@NathanGeckler Congrats on the launch! I haven't tried Anything yet.
I'm curious about the 'vibe coding' workflow: Did you have to architect the data structure/state management first, or did the AI handle the structural logic too?
Trying to gauge how autonomous these new tools really are
You Architect -> AI Codes
(You define the interfaces/data structures, AI handles the boilerplate)
AI Architects -> You Code
(AI suggests the system design/patterns, you implement the critical logic)
If you let the AI do both you're just generating legacy code at light speed
Vibe coding is a trap.
To actually ship production software with AI, you need to split the "Thinking" from the "Typing."
There are only 2 winning workflows
We spent months building a multiplayer backend in @nodejs , only to hit a wall at 20 CCU
We debugged, optimized, and profiled... but the architecture just couldn't handle the load.
So we took a risk: rewriting the stack 🧵👇
@nodejs@webrtc@nodeclinic@golang@_pion It wasn't that Node is "bad." Node is amazing for I/O-bound web apps. But for CPU-bound, high-frequency packet replication? The single threaded model fights you.
Go’s concurrency model + Pion was the right tool for this specific engineering problem.
We spent months building a multiplayer backend in @nodejs , only to hit a wall at 20 CCU
We debugged, optimized, and profiled... but the architecture just couldn't handle the load.
So we took a risk: rewriting the stack 🧵👇
@nodejs@webrtc@nodeclinic@golang@_pion It was a 5 day sprint of ~18 hour shifts. But the results were instant.
Node.js: ~20 CCU (Crashes/Lag) Golang: 200 CCU per server
We handled the N² fan-out easily because Go spread the load across all CPU cores.