Milind Solanki

Reader, Writer, Editor, Poet, Translator, Folk Studies Enthusiastic, Believer..
Assistant Professor- Central University of Gujarat

[Milind Solanki @imilindsolanki]

First ever in cricket history. Just Smriti Mandhana doing Smriti Mandhana things. 🐐🔥

[BCCI Women @BCCIWomen]

𝗜𝗡 𝗔 𝗟𝗘𝗔𝗚𝗨𝗘 𝗢𝗙 𝗛𝗘𝗥 𝗢𝗪𝗡 🫡

#TeamIndia Vice-captain Smriti Mandhana becomes the first player ever to hit 6️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ fours in T20Is (men's and women's) 🙇‍♀️

Updates ▶️ https://t.co/FMkrKB1zcS

#T20WorldCup | #WomenInBlue | #INDvNED | @mandhana_smriti

[Milind Solanki @imilindsolanki]

@BCCIWomen @mandhana_smriti Congratulations Great Feat...

[Milind Solanki @imilindsolanki]

A 250-year-old handwritten manuscript of the Ramcharitmanas finds its home at Ayodhya’s International Ramkatha Museum. Incredible effort to preserve our rich literary history and heritage! 📜✨#heritage #परमात्मा_चारों_युगमें_आतेहैं

[DD News @DDNewslive]

A rare handwritten manuscript of Tulsidas’ Ramcharitmanas, believed to be over 250 years old, will be preserved at Ayodhya’s International Ramkatha Museum.

The manuscript, estimated to date back to around 1768 AD, comprises nearly 650 pages written on traditional handmade paper and features distinctive red and black ink inscriptions.

Despite damage caused by age and termite infestation, experts say it remains a valuable cultural and literary treasure.

The manuscript has been acquired under the museum’s “Ramayana Manuscript Collection Yajna” project and is expected to become a major attraction for researchers and devotees alike.

#Ayodhya #Ramcharitmanas #Ramayan #RamkathaMuseum #LordRam

@CMOfficeUP @myogiadityanath @UPGovt @PIB_India @MIB_India

[Milind Solanki @imilindsolanki]

@DDNewslive A 250-year-old handwritten manuscript of the Ramcharitmanas finds its home at Ayodhya’s International Ramkatha Museum. Incredible effort to preserve our rich literary history and heritage! 📜✨

[Milind Solanki @imilindsolanki]

@_K_Stiles @curaffairs This isn't just about student "cheating"—it's an institutional crisis.

[Milind Solanki @imilindsolanki]

The "dead internet theory" applied directly to higher education. If AI writes the prompt, AI synthesizes the paper, and AI generates the feedback, the entire concept of a degree turns into a hollow compliance loop for corporate tech profit.
@AIinResearch_EN @Posthumanism_AI @AIGuide_ @aivideonews

[Katherine Stiles @_K_Stiles]

AI is Destroying the University and Learning Itself

Students use AI to write papers, professors use AI to grade them, degrees become meaningless, and tech companies make fortunes. Welcome to the death of higher education. https://t.co/k6zUL1ZNCy @curaffairs

[Milind Solanki @imilindsolanki]

Fascinating read on why the traditional scientific paper format is obsolete for the AI era. We are shifting from writing research for human consumption to formatting data for autonomous AI Agents to execute and reproduce instantly.
@academic4nation @AcademicChatter @nori2009int

[Kyronis @kyronis_talks]

This may be the last paper written by humans for AI to read.

Recently, I came across a paper co-authored by 37 authors from Stanford, CMU, Michigan, and elsewhere: *The Last Human-Written Paper*.

The core argument is pretty brutal: the paper format we've been using for centuries might already be obsolete in the AI era.

The authors point out two "invisible taxes" that we've long overlooked:

One is the narrative tax. To tell a compelling story, we delete failed experiments, dead ends, and overturned hypotheses. What AI reads is a "walkthrough guide" to beating the game, but it misses the truly valuable "pitfall logs."

The other is the engineering tax. The implementation details in papers are usually enough to convince reviewers, but not enough for an Agent to directly reproduce. Many key tricks are still buried in the authors' heads, code comments, and Slack threads.

So the authors propose ARA, transforming papers directly into "research packages" that Agents can read and execute: not just telling you the conclusions, but packaging in how they were reached, how the code runs, where the evidence chain is, and which paths led nowhere.

I think the most intriguing part of this paper is that it's not discussing how AI can help humans write papers—it's asking:

When AI also becomes a reader and executor of papers, should papers still look like they do today?

In the future, the core of research output might no longer be "how much it resembles a paper," but whether it can be understood, reproduced, traced, and iteratively extended by AI.

Humans have been writing papers for centuries—next, we might start writing research packages for Agents to execute.

[Milind Solanki @imilindsolanki]

@kyronis_talks Fascinating read on why the traditional scientific paper format is obsolete for the AI era. We are shifting from writing research for human consumption to formatting data for autonomous AI Agents to execute and reproduce instantly.

[Milind Solanki @imilindsolanki]

Excellence at the helm! 👏 Ellah Wakatama OBE is a phenomenal choice for Chair of Judges. Check out the full interview below. 👇
@WasafiriMag @acade

[Wasafiri @WasafiriMag]

With over 25 years of experience as a publisher, Ellah Wakatama OBE is our Chair of Judges for the 2026 Queen Mary Wasafiri New Writing Prize. Read our Q&A with her on our website, discussing the role of prizes in the current literary landscape and more.

https://t.co/iJOM6Rglgq

[Milind Solanki @imilindsolanki]

Level up your research game for free. 📈 A list of game-changing websites every researcher and student needs to bookmark right now. 🔍
#phdlife #resourcesforphd
@AIinResearch_EN
@academic4nation
@AcademicChatter

[ᗩshhh🇬🇧 @1yoursashh]

You don't need an expensive subscription to find quality research.

These 10 websites can save you hours of searching and help you discover millions of papers.

1. Anna's Archive
https://t.co/usCWHTmKA3
One of the largest open libraries online for books, papers, and academic resources.

2. Google Scholar
https://t.co/FoH3QV2B5U
Search scholarly articles and sort by citations to find the most influential research.

3. Semantic Scholar
https://t.co/xnNtNzSZ0b
An AI-powered academic search engine that helps you find relevant papers faster.

4. Connected Papers
https://t.co/NzmLNfyfid
Visualize related research papers and discover connections you might otherwise miss.

5. Elicit
https://t.co/2KIWGNCx9y
Ask research questions in plain English and get evidence-backed paper summaries.

6. Consensus
https://t.co/23uGtjTeCI
Search scientific literature and see what the research consensus says.

7. ResearchRabbit
https://t.co/eszxhRGBtU
Discover papers through AI-powered recommendations tailored to your interests.

8. Litmaps
https://t.co/UeTMrYaD21
Explore citation networks and track how ideas evolve across research.

9. Scite
https://t.co/KbkK7Jptki
See whether papers support, contradict, or simply mention a scientific claim.

10. CORE
https://t.co/LkrMSm50km
Access hundreds of millions of open-access research papers from repositories worldwide.

Whether you're a student, researcher, founder, or lifelong learner, these tools are worth bookmarking.

🔖Bookmark this list, you'll thank yourself during your next research project.

[Milind Solanki @imilindsolanki]

@1yoursashh Thank you. Indeed good for research across the globe.

[Milind Solanki @imilindsolanki]

@UN Setting the ground rules for the future of AI. A massive win for global collaboration. 🌍

[Milind Solanki @imilindsolanki]

Setting the ground rules for the future of AI. A massive win for global collaboration. 🌍

[United Nations @UN]

As AI reshapes our world, we must ensure it benefits everyone – and that it is accessible and safe.

The first global scientific body on artificial intelligence brings together independent experts to assess how AI is transforming our lives and how it can serve the common good.

[Milind Solanki @imilindsolanki]

Excited to see this new comprehensive resource launch! 📚 Covering everything from Egypt to China, it looks like a must-have collection for anyone studying or teaching ancient history. Check it out 👇

[Bloomsbury Classical Studies & Archaeology @BloomsburyClass]

Introducing The History of the Ancient World collection on the Bloomsbury History platform. Spanning Egypt, Mesopotamia, China, Persia, and beyond, it balances general histories and archaeological site studies with social and cultural analyses. More: https://t.co/CsxD6qUc3D

[Milind Solanki @imilindsolanki]

Discover the legacy behind the song that united a nation. Great new release from @nbt_india for young readers! 🇮🇳📖 #VandeMataram @milindsmarathe

[National Book Trust, India @nbt_india]

National Book Trust, India has recently published the book titled The Story of Vande Mataram, which provides a glimpse into the life of its creator, Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay and historical facts about it...

Read More at NBT E-Newsletter : https://t.co/tejNwiX2Ap

[Milind Solanki @imilindsolanki]

@nbt_india @EduMinOfIndia @PIB_Edu @MIB_India @CBC_MIB @PTI_News @DDNewslive @airnewsalerts @e_pustakalaya @dpradhanbjp Discover the legacy behind the song that united a nation. Great new release from @nbt_india for young readers! 🇮🇳📖 #VandeMataram

[Milind Solanki @imilindsolanki]

Interesting Read....

[Milind Solanki @imilindsolanki]

@laterinfo_ So true. Chaos breeds creativity. Stop organizing, start accumulating and revisiting.

[Milind Solanki @imilindsolanki]

This is exactly why over-engineered note-taking systems fail. The magic happens when an anatomy sketch sits right next to a random philosophy thought. Systems should serve creativity, not control it. 👇

[나중에볼정보 @laterinfo_]

창의성은 재능이 아니라 시스템이다 — '성배(Grail) 노트' 방법론.

다빈치 노트 6,000쪽을 본 적 있는 사람은 알겠지만, 엄청나게 뒤죽박죽임.
폴더도 없고, 분류도 없고, 해부학 스케치 옆에 뜬금없는 철학 메모가 붙어있음.
근데 다빈치만 그런 게 아님. 다윈도, 뉴턴도 전부 이랬음.
천재들은 정리를 안 했음. 대신 한 권에 다 몰아넣고, 끊임없이 다시 봤음.
이걸 정리한 게 '성배 노트' 방법론임.
이름은 인디아나 존스의 성배 일기장에서 따온 건데, 핵심은 단순함. 모든 걸 노트 한 권에 모으고, 계속 복습하는 것.

1. 정리하지 말 것

노션이나 불렛 저널은 아이디어가 떠오르면 "이걸 어느 폴더에 넣지?" 고민하게 만듦.
그 마찰이 아이디어를 휘발시킴.
성배 노트는 다음 빈 공간에 그냥 적음. 명언이든 스케치든 쓰레기 같은 생각이든 상관없음.
자기 검열 없이, 분류 없이, 떠오르는 대로 몰아넣는 거임.
깔끔하게 정리하려다 노트 펼치기가 두려워지는 게 진짜 문제임. 무질서함은 버그가 아니라 핵심 기능임.

2. 적는 게 아니라 다시 보는 게 핵심임

시간 날 때마다 노트를 앞뒤로 넘김.
3주 전에 적은 메모랑 어제 적은 아이디어가 우연히 만나면, 분야를 넘나드는 새로운 연결이 생김. 이게 창의성임.
폴더별로 예쁘게 분류하면 아이디어끼리 섞일 기회가 사라짐. 근데 뒤죽박죽인 한 권 안에서는 융합이 자연스럽게 일어남.
복습을 반복하면 거품은 빠지고, 보잘것없던 메모가 프로젝트로 발전하기도 함. 좋은 아이디어만 살아남는 자연 필터링이 되는 거임.

3. 딱 하나, 적으면 안 되는 것

할 일 목록. 이건 이 노트에 쓰면 안 됨.

우유 사기, 이메일 보내기 같은 건 일시적이고 소모적인 정보임. 섞이면 창의적 사고를 방해함.
할 일은 포스트잇에 적고, 성배 노트는 오직 아이디어와 생각만을 위해 남겨둬야 함.
이건 더 많은 일을 해내는 도구가 아님. 더 의미 있는 걸 만들어내는 도구임.