MxGreen

Unknowingly contrarian with increasingly unpopular interests, views and hobbies. Lockdown should be a dirty word.

[Secretary Kennedy @SecKennedy]

Congratulations, @NIHDirector_Jay, on your appointment as Acting Director of @CDCgov in addition to your role as Director of @NIH. You have championed gold standard science, transparent data, and public accountability — and CDC will benefit from that same disciplined leadership at this pivotal time.

[MxGreen @incognitoCatz]

@SeneddWaste (Carmen Smith)

[MxGreen @incognitoCatz]

@SeneddWaste (Carmen Smith)

[MxGreen @incognitoCatz]

#NewProfilePic

[MxGreen @incognitoCatz]

@WelshLabour You’re doing exactly this all the time! The brass neck of it!!!!

[MxGreen @incognitoCatz]

@VPrasadMDMPH Surely ‘ A lot of NIH grants USED to involve ……’ 😉

[Richard Hanania @RichardHanania]

I watched the entire press conference with Zelensky. There was 40 minutes of discussion up to the argument. Most people saw at most the last ten minutes. The whole video gives the proper context.

When I first watched the argument without the proper context, I thought it was possible that Trump and Vance ambushed Zelensky or were even trying to humiliate him. That's not what happened.

You had 40 minutes of calm conversation. Vance made a point that didn't attack Zelensky and wasn't even addressed to him, and Zelensky clearly started the argument.

In the first 40 minutes, Zelensky kept trying to go beyond what was negotiated in the deal. When Trump was asked a question, it was always "we'll see." Zelensky made blanket assertions that there would be no negotiating with Putin, and that Russia would pay for the war. When Trump said that it was a tragedy that people on both sides were dying, Zelensky interjected that the Russians were the invaders.

For his part, Trump made clear that the US would continue delivering military aid. All Zelensky had to do was remain calm for a few more minutes and they would've signed a deal.

The argument started when Trump pointed out that it would be hard to make a deal if you talk about Putin the way Zelensky does. Vance interjects to make the reasonable point that Biden called Putin names and that didn't get us anywhere.

The Zelensky/Trump dynamic was calm and stable. It was when Vance spoke that Zelensky started to interrogate him. Throughout the press conference to that point, everyone was making their arguments directly to the audience. Zelensky decided to challenge Vance and ask him hostile questions. He went back to his point that Putin never sticks to ceasefires, once again implying that negotiations are pointless. Why on earth would you do this? Then came the fight we all saw.

Zelensky was minutes away from being home free, and he would have had the deal and new commitments from the Trump administration. The point Vance made was directed against Biden and the media, taking them to task for speaking in moralistic terms. This offended Zelensky, and that began the argument.

I've been a fan of Zelensky up to this point, but this showed so much incompetence, if not emotional instability, that I don't see how he recovers from this. The relationship with the administration is broken. Ukraine should probably go with new leadership at this point.

[MxGreen @incognitoCatz]

@WelshLabour @AndrewMorganRCT It’s doing sod all to support its farming communities, It’s tourism communities or its small businesses…

[Dr Aseem Malhotra @DrAseemMalhotra]

Piers. Firstly it’s NOTHING like traditional vaccines - it’s a gene therapy. Secondly saved ‘millions of lives’ is based upon very poor quality evidence, described by @carlheneghan as ‘implausible’. There’s not been a single rebuttal to this letter which the CEO of GMC thanked me for sending https://t.co/KcpOmKbfKY

[MxGreen @incognitoCatz]

@JamesMelville @AJKayWriter - an excellent list to work through! All used often at Fforest.

[MxGreen @incognitoCatz]

@EdwardJDavey Ed Davey once again you prove yourself a dangerous idiot. The UK population do not want this.

[MxGreen @incognitoCatz]

@redrumlisa Spot on @redrumlisa , this is utter madness! Absolutely.

[Lisa Mckenzie @redrumlisa]

#Starmer No. Send your own kids.

[🇬🇧 Rachel @RachelD1892]

🚨 Former Mauritius PM Pravind Jugnauth has been arrested on money laundering charges 🚨
He 'masterminded' the Chagos Islands deal that Starmer and Lammy are so desperate to rush through.
If it looks bad and smells bad, it is bad!
CORRUPTION!!

[MxGreen @incognitoCatz]

@CynefinMusic @JacotheNorth @CPRW_UK @ButeEnergyWales Policies are defended not because they’re working or going to, but because too much has been invested to turn back. Meanwhile, businesses and families like mine are left to bear the cost of ideological commitments that take no account of economic reality.

[MxGreen @incognitoCatz]

@CynefinMusic @JacotheNorth @CPRW_UK @ButeEnergyWales As someone whose business is at risk of being sunk by the net zero agenda in the UK, not to mention the decimation of our beautiful hills, I see the sunk cost fallacy playing out in real time.

[MxGreen @incognitoCatz]

@CynefinMusic @JacotheNorth @CPRW_UK @ButeEnergyWales Oh my lord, sunk cost fallacy in action.

It is now widely accepted- even by those who once promoted the following views that
1. SARS cov 2 originated in a lab that was carrying out GOF experiments.
2. Vaccines against Covid offered no protection against infection.

[MxGreen @incognitoCatz]

@CynefinMusic @JacotheNorth @CPRW_UK @ButeEnergyWales My answer was given, obviously, to show that a consensus within a scientific community does not indicate truthful evidence. Duh.

[MxGreen @incognitoCatz]

@CynefinMusic @JacotheNorth @CPRW_UK @ButeEnergyWales Do you remember the Covid years? Literally thousands of scientists and public health professionals all pushing untruths such as SARS-cov-2 having no link to gain of function testing paid for by NIH, zero transmission after vaccination, vaccines for children…A deadly consensus