👺🐶

Philosophy.

[👺🐶 @InnocentPrig]

@vivalavarnes @philwhd @AValcreuse @Slide2theleft_ @FloofskanZhit This why people asked if you read anything. Marx was not arguing for some simplistic labor theory of value where the value or price of a commodity is determined by someone just laboring. Marx’s whole point was that value in this way is socially necessary labor time.

[florence 🦐🏳️‍🌈 @morallawwithin]

A good window into how evil the average person is is how common cheating is. Not cheating is the easiest thing ever! You literally just don’t do it!

[👺🐶 @InnocentPrig]

@joetrapani @its_keavs @LilithLovett But you didn’t actually address the counter point. If this is a purely choice based thing, how is it occuring in the first place given society is heteronormative? Is being straight not rubbing off on people as well?

[👺🐶 @InnocentPrig]

@FirstNa56739901 @SeraphRex96 @AHSTROL You have to be both really fucking stupid and ahistorical to come to think the way you do. It’s almost laughable how little you conceptually know about this topic, you just employ a geriatric style of tribalistic argument. There isn’t even a moral basis for your claim.

[👺🐶 @InnocentPrig]

@franitarian @blunderscores @ZackInvascious2 @PopCrave I mean bro if you go through your graph you’re literally just lying. At this point engaging with your ilk is pointless. You guys don’t care about truth, and only seek to lie to support your goals.

[👺🐶 @InnocentPrig]

@lselune Hey I guess, if your lot think your presence is some massive force I’d beckon you to really think about what you think the online outrage actually results in materially. Second, even the best idealist case for your group in a “war” results in your loss as I said.

[👺🐶 @InnocentPrig]

@lselune As someone with the opposite worldview of you and nick. I think these posts calling for war are very naive. Let’s just say the extreme best case for you guys happened. In the end your lot wouldn’t win. Not because the left would. But because the techno-feudalist would.

[👺🐶 @InnocentPrig]

@pfrawley87 @jaythri_ @colinurbuddy @Awk20000 Given the fact his friends also said he was a Trump supporter, and the contents of the article, if you don’t believe it there’s nothing that can be said to you. You’ve came in already firmly in a position you can’t reason yourself out of no matter what’s in your face.

[👺🐶 @InnocentPrig]

@pfrawley87 @jaythri_ @colinurbuddy @Awk20000 https://t.co/UpwcW9CG4G

[👺🐶 @InnocentPrig]

@Will449719 @NebsGoodTakes So you sit here, and just make excuses for why the vile shit that gets said is excusable? Like do you not see the hypocrisy in your own statement?

[👺🐶 @InnocentPrig]

@Neverwa64906608 @NewAugustD @Thepipfantastic @conro @PiscoLitty “You know that the institutions, mores, and traditions of various countries must be taken into consideration, and we do not deny that there are countries -- such as America, England…where the workers can attain their goal by peaceful means.”

[👺🐶 @InnocentPrig]

@Neverwa64906608 @NewAugustD @Thepipfantastic @conro @PiscoLitty Yo do me a favor because this petulant virtue signaler blocked me, link him this quote:

[👺🐶 @InnocentPrig]

@NewAugustD @Neverwa64906608 @Thepipfantastic @conro @PiscoLitty Even, say, orthodox Marxist who do take more of the revolutionary approach aren’t doing so normatively: there ought to be a revolution. It’s more a descriptive claim about the states of affairs capitalism will lead to. Which, obviously can be wrong, but that’s distinct.

[👺🐶 @InnocentPrig]

@NewAugustD @Neverwa64906608 @Thepipfantastic @conro @PiscoLitty I mean this aspect isn’t even true. Marxist humanist, certain left communist positions, etc, don’t argue for violent revolution in their core ideology. Even Marx himself doesn’t state violent revolution as being always necessary (see la liberte speech). (1/2)

[👺🐶 @InnocentPrig]

@ggmk6_ @CDontaes @Donut62 @Itz_Seeboss @PiscoLitty To be clear this isn’t true. There are many kinds of communist that are non-Marxist, though almost always Marxist are communist.

[👺🐶 @InnocentPrig]

@hideousmalform @Race__Realist @GarbageHuman24 I’m begging race realist of this ilk to read philosophy of race. Compiling graphs from various studies, most of which have responses in the literature, doesn’t do the leg work you think it does.

[👺🐶 @InnocentPrig]

@RandylVlarsh @Melihanon @Boshikage_Yowie You haven’t even seen 1% of the black community, how does it seem reasonable to you to make this statement? This is just hypocritical. Go through this comment section and look at what white people are saying, you think it’s reasonable to do the same extrapolation you just did?

[👺🐶 @InnocentPrig]

@AchyBreakyCyrax @CDTVProductions Someone needs to arrest this guy

[👺🐶 @InnocentPrig]

@DharmicAsura @TLTorelle @lesliedouglasx @historyoarmani2 They were subsumed into the state ideologically, as were the people because fascism (from actual idealism) necessitates that the state gives meaning to all people/corporations. But to say they were subservient is incorrect: FIAT, Pirelli, etc werent. Read Fascism and Big Buisness

[👺🐶 @InnocentPrig]

@OnwardnUpward2 @Coopeywriting @YA0IFRQTTING You have to be a special kind of moron to think Lynn’s map was valid after it got obliterated by other academics.