1. Layla and Majnun by Nizami
2. Consolation of Philosophy by Boethius
3. Being and Time by Heidegger (🖕)
4. The Mystery of Capital by De Soto
5. Confessions of an Economic Hitman by Perkins
6. The Last Buffalo Hunter by Mosher
7. The Alchemy of Finance by Soros
1. Augustine's Confessions
2. Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language
3. The Zhuangzi
4. CLR James' The Black Jacobins
5. The Russian Revolution by Rosa Luxemburg
6. Epictetus' Discourses
7. Einstein's Dreams by Lightman
@David_Gunkel@politybooks IF this was the end of history, sure.
BUT it’s not. Still a few moves to go.
Sides in Oracy/Literacy? There are no sides. I can’t imagine it’s controversial that speaking and writing are different. Well, now just add “coordinating” - and Im formalizing it all.
@David_Gunkel@politybooks McLuhan is drivel. Ong doesn’t under the words.
The ontology shift, however, is direct dyad (Oracy) to moderated dyad (literacy) to mediated triad (algorithmacy)
Nothing to do with “consciousness” but does reset 4e cognition holistically
Our Hegel stuff is coming soon!!
@David_Gunkel@politybooks Im teaching undergrads at a business school: same challenge, different angle.
And yeah that makes sense: it’s a bridge for those who won’t let go
I’ll recommend this to people for whom the triad is overwhelming. In that sense, it’s necessary!
@David_Gunkel@politybooks Very much hoping Stiegler makes it into ch. 6!
Looking forward to reading it all and hopefully finding some citations I’ve missed.
3/3
@David_Gunkel@politybooks You return to the oracy–literacy transition as an ethics of adoption rather than an ontological restructuring…but I’m not sure why you stop short?
2/3
@David_Gunkel@MCoeckelbergh@politybooks No problem with that, the unease is glaring - but I read those sections of Phaedrus as self-referential and ironic, a glimpse of Platonic playfulness
And not just another -acy. It’s sugar coating direct dyads (Oracy), moderated dyads (Literacy), and full mediation (Algorithmacy)
@David_Gunkel@MCoeckelbergh@politybooks I wonder what part gets the “no”
Try Algorithmacy on for size. Clears all this up nicely. Logos and its false centrism is a bridge between coordination forms.
Coordinative Sovereignty at SBE, Trinidad in Oct (https://t.co/lwR4QX8c2H), and then in print 2027!
@SIUChasmite Yes we are deskilling literacy like we previously deskilled Oracy.
Becuase literacy is fun and aesthetic, hut useless.
Welcome to the age of algorithmacy.
Submit to the conference!
https://t.co/57AF0dnFad
@David_Gunkel@ICA_HMC@icahdq@NIUlive@SAGEPublishers CMC is antiquated. HMC fails, however, for the similar reasons: a moderated dyadic - aka literacy - based approach.
In 2 years I’ll be defending the dissertation and since Andrea is cited like 500 times (maybe not that many), I’m confident my committee will be reaching out!
@David_Gunkel@mitpress@ryolu_@cursor_ai@MCoeckelbergh@Hayate_Shimizu@PuzioAnna Fair enough, didn’t mean to rope in others, but there is a derivative HMC research group in your vicinity. Great work! Just wrong lol.
I’ll do a pretty quick and dirty run on substack, then see if a paper comes out of it.
And come to https://t.co/lwR4QX8c2H - Trinidad rocks!!