19 years working with people experiencing homelessness. AI thinker exploring technology, learning and human reality from the front lines. Weekly newsletter.
To those who pit Sam Altman and Elon Musk against each other like a billionaire feud, look, do your own research.
When have you ever seen Elon Musk use his money to buy a yacht, a paradise island, or engage in extravagant spending?
Even the money from this lawsuit, if he wins, will be donated to charity.
On the other hand, why did Sam Altman change the bylaws of OpenAI, which was a non-profit organization? Why is everything opaque at OpenAI? Who benefits from the money?
To all the skeptics, do your own research. I have no doubt about your conclusions if you seek the truth.
On one side, there is a man who dedicates his life to the well-being of humanity, and on the other, a man who seeks profit, even at the risk of endangering humanity.
Elon Musk must win.
Full Newsletter: “Sophists and Shyster Lawyers”
In this piece I cover:
→ Why AI is the modern version of Socrates
→ The end of hidden contract traps and legal exploitation
→ Why transparent companies will win and opaque ones will lose
→ The simple rule: Those who ask (AI), win. Those who just click, pay the price.
Would love to hear your thoughts — especially if you’ve already used AI to fight a bad contract or unfair clause.
https://t.co/8THe5O09LV
For centuries, Sophists and shady lawyers made money by hiding traps in complicated language that normal people couldn’t understand.
Those days are ending.
AI is becoming the new Socrates; the gadfly that cuts through the bullshit of hundred-page contracts, hidden fees, unfair clauses, and shady terms of service.
Suddenly, anyone can understand what they’re actually signing. What used to cost hundreds of dollars in legal fees now takes seconds.
My latest newsletter explores this shift: How AI is destroying the business model of legal obfuscation and giving power back to the individual.
Full article here 👇
@karatademada Well, the algorithm does if it really works the way you claim. Which I doubt, since there are loads of big accounts posting lame content earning a lot of money.
They wouldn´t be to happy if their income suddenly were to drop.
Full Newsletter: “The Ostrich Strategy”
In this piece I cover:
→ Why creatives with a clear inner vision have a huge head start with AI
→ The Kodak analogy, ignoring disruption is fatal
→ Why “100% human creativity” alone will no longer be enough in the market
→ Why the next 3 months could be decisive for many in creative professions
Would love to hear your thoughts, especially from fellow creatives, photographers, and designers.
https://t.co/m8XDWVNj6j
Many creatives are currently the most afraid of AI, even though they could benefit from it the most.
Photographers, designers, marketers, and artists already have strong visual imagination and technical understanding. They could use AI like a high-end instrument.
Instead, many are burying their heads in the sand (“Ostrich Strategy”), hoping “real creativity” will protect them.
Just like Kodak did.
My latest newsletter explores why this mindset is dangerous, and why creatives who embrace AI now will have a massive advantage in the coming years.
Full article here 👇
ChatGPT Image 2 schlägt derzeit alles, was an Image Generation auf dem Markt ist. Um Längen!
Alles one-shots:
- "Eine Diskussion auf ORF zum Thema Kornkreise mit Liveschaltungen."
- "Eine detaillierte Erklärung von Langfuse."
- "Ein Rezept für Gulaschsuppe mit den realen Zutaten dargestellt."
- "Eine Karte mit positiven Stereotypen der österreichischen Bundesländer im Stil von Asterix."
@VibeCreAI@threejs@PixelLabAI I cannot wait for what future AI releases will make possible.
Turn your favourite TV show into a point & click adventure.
@WWilson40510@jun_song What do you mean be "free"? It is "biased", like any other LLM, the bias is just different. Less restrictive, less "woke", more egalitarian.