@ilonggobud@bncdotph exactly! the ND/AOM/NS has already presupposed the misuse of funds. that gives the COA/Imp. Court the right to question how the funds are used. defense may not invoke confidentiality bec they will have to prove funds were given to real persons to dispute misuse
@mlq3 simple. the 2nd placer would not have won the seat against the 1st placer who was still in the choices. keeping prior elections results just because the seat is subsequently vacated violates the choice of the majority who voted for the 1st placer.
@zryanverse@mlq3 next, if the academe, will use real-time public spending information through the blockchain for research purposes, they will legitimize what the government will put there. That puts a burden on the government to be transparent
@oldiesmd1228@newswatchplusph lol and the Court deserves the same respect. imagine being an accountable officer handling public funds and yet your answer in a five hour-hearing is the same over and over again.
that "stupidity" line was meant to provoke the witness to defend herself. she did not.
@MxNoelle yes! madaming tuwang tuwa sa kanila kahit harap harapan silang ginagago kasi majority sa mga bobotante ganun din. palamura, walang modo, bayolente, balahura, mangmang
@PanditLumina pag walang makapatay bukod kay angel, canino-laure OH; then pag crucial end-of-sets and need ng defense, bella-laure OH; pag need ng game changers, nitura naman
mix n match lang talaga pero need ma establish yung canino-belen starter talaga
@PanditLumina actually ang pinaka nag work na arrangement talaga is canino-belen OH then sub si laure on 3-4 of the 5 setter games.
lugi na kalaban sa ganyan kase pagod na sila, iinit pa lang si eya (ie. AVC25 vs. Chinese Taipei)
@RusselSimonRox2 actually si palomata ang dapat umalis. nakaka sira ng rhythm sa court yung pagiging aanga anga niya. jusko, wala ng basa sa blocks, mabagal pa
bukod sa blocks and spikes, si thea, fifi, amie marunong dumepensa at mag set pag backrow sila. si ytang, game changer so need.
@montolentino_ youre all valid but by responding you just gave the mean pathetic sad accs the platform to justify their hateful takesπ π π
i mean they wanna be mean bec they want you bothered. they want reactions to their supposedly cool takes and thats exactly what you gave themπ π