Why a Catholic in good standing could receive the Eucharist from the SSPX, from someone who disagrees with the SSPX
Open Thread to Confused Catholics
Do you meet these conditions? π§΅
@Cevicts@Faebled1 Yeah, God bless your relationship into a fruitful marriage. The cool thing is that you can actually develop into this ideal with the same person. I don't want you to have any false hope brother, don't be satisfied until she's a submissive wife π
@Cevicts@Faebled1 People are terrible judges of their own happiness and what makes them happy, left to their own judgement and presumptions. That doesn't work. No one makes vows believing it will be a failed marriage, and it falling apart after years doesn't come out of nowhere. Rather be schizo
@Cevicts@Faebled1 Just a repeat of this. It's true that we shouldn't be a tyrant, it's also true that we shouldn't be a liar and morally compromise for any woman's attention and approval. Women are attracted to a man who want a specific woman and has specific intentions
https://t.co/oYCHCOH88u
@Faebled1 If women have too much evil to submit to God, they will have too much evil to submit to a holy husband. Don't commit idolatry for the sake of women, believe that it's possible for them to sin for no other reason than it's what a corrupt heart wanted.
@Cevicts@Faebled1 If you keep focusing on "a woman's" attention and approval, you're going to get cooked. There is no master strat that pulls both reprobates and saints
@Cevicts@Faebled1 The numbers are way less, but people who prioritize moral value and have the moral value to back it up will find each other, pray together, and stay together. It's the fewness of the saved. Go to heaven or don't, it's our choice.
@Faebled1 That's ultimately what all holy marriages on earth will be. Adulterers saying, "Ew, they're total creeps and cannibals!" And then good Catholics just enjoying each other, knowing that their value doesn't depend on the success of getting their attention and approval
@Faebled1 I know, he was wrong for assuming that a woman on a dating app would believe in marriage. We could spend time pointing him to people who match his moral value and longevity instead of saying he's a creep
@Faebled1 That's where you're going about this all wrong. A man's value isn't based on a woman's attention or approval, and men who are providers and believe this have the greatest moral value and longevity in the dating market.
@Faebled1 Ultimately, the only reason why a woman would act against any evil inclinations against their husband and obey God is if they love God. If they don't have that, there's no reasonable expectation that there would be submission
@Faebled1 What I want to know is if the woman intends to be submissive to God in the first 5 words I speak to her, and that can be pretty easy to tell. I've had a great success and filter with that
@Faebled1 In this case, listen to the woman. The context says that the women thinks that he's great, but she said she doesn't want that marriage so she could go into other guys' dms. You don't have to explain much more than that, a man looking for real marriage should have one, that's okay
@Faebled1 The Book of Tobit has a holy marriage where the wife met the husband on the same day, got married, and became submissive. I'm telling you that it's the woman who doesn't have a genuine idea of marriage, likely not even genuine intent. We shouldn't fall for neo-feminist narratives
@Faebled1 The mistake he made there was believing that the woman would be good enough to believe in marriage. Most people believe you must commit adultery as boyfriend-girlfriend to "secure a legal contract," and even most Catholics believe/do that. Virtue is weird, vice is normal.
@Faebled1 If women have too much evil to submit to God, they will have too much evil to submit to a holy husband. Don't commit idolatry for the sake of women, believe that it's possible for them to sin for no other reason than it's what a corrupt heart wanted.
@UntoldFortune I think that you'd be revealing more of a rejection of St. Ignatius by using the quote in opposition to it. 2+2=4 was infallibly defined by God in nature, with the Vicar of Christ upholding 2+2=4. We shouldn't deny what the Church has defined if the Church contradicts it fallibly