Having the right language to describe what you want - in animation or beyond - is critical to going from “anyone could do this” to something special.
Curious to see how long this edge will last.
To get good animations from an AI you need to get good at telling it what you want:
- "stagger this list of items"
- "make this animation direction-aware"
- "spacial consistency", "crossfade", "layout animation",
I made a motion vocabulary for this:
https://t.co/ExAxpr31no
The venn diagram of people who can imagine boldly, operate excellently, and build with community might be small, but it's that much more important to find them.
Move quickly, but don't speedrun through decades of experience and ignore the hard lessons learned.
New blog post: The third wave of American philanthropy
Hundreds of billions of dollars in new philanthropic capital will soon become liquid. The OpenAI Foundation holds 26% of OpenAI, worth about $220B at today’s valuation. Anthropic’s seven co-founders have pledged to give away 80% of their wealth and have instituted the most aggressive donor matching program for employees in tech history.
How much does this all add up to? And how meaningful is that in the context of philanthropy today?
I was doing some simple napkin math to wrap my head around the scale of what’s coming, and radicalized myself in the process. I had dramatically underappreciated the scale of the philanthropic capital that’s about to become available and the corresponding gap in talent and organizations that will be needed to make the most of it.
This piece aims to directionally sketch the scale of what’s coming, the gap in operational capacity needed to absorb it, and what we can do to fill it.
(Link to full post in reply)
Once you build your internet stack on @obsessedapp it scans everything and gives you a brief of what's important. Obviously, I had to add a shader animation.
Inevitable. What a sneaky, dangerous word.
It closes off the possibility space and points to a specific (person’s, group’s, ideology’s) version of the future as the only one possible.
@Wattenberger I agree with the broader points. Implement is rarely just implement and where we spend our time is shifting. However, what happens when you switch from this linear view to a loop? Yes we should plan (and think!) more, but aren’t we now having more frequent and faster loops?