📌 Trying to understand how current court proceedings may connect to what was not examined during the Irish Banking Inquiry?
👇 Start here
🔗 https://t.co/pBSiI8t8Hz
🔎 What you’ll find:
• ⚖️ Oversight and regulatory issues
• 📄 Whistleblower disclosures, supporting evidence, and documentation indicating that key disclosures were not reviewed, as reflected in official transcripts and committee correspondence
• 🏛️ Court proceedings, communications, and related concerns
• 📊 Research submitted to relevant institutions
• 🏦 Ulster Bank: allegations and related material
• 🧾 Official responses and institutional context
• 🎥 Video evidence and public records
• 📌 Additional topics (including VAT and corporate issues)
• 🗂️ Timeline of key events
📖 Please review the material.
🧠 Draw your own conclusions.
The recent show on #RTEInvestgates about the #gardawhistleblowers prompted some research
the results are clear
-- > Ignoring witnesses and / or testimony was (is) the theme (Deny) in whistleblower cases.
It could be the reason why 57% of recent submittals to EU were from Ireland
We updated our Official Ireland tab with two sections:
a) a high level summary of major cases (link below) and
b) added a list of news articles related to all these and other cases
the theme is clear - Deny through ignoring.
The @irishtimes article about Delay Deny Destroy is also on the Human Cost of Speaking out section of Official Ireland page
If any of the statements in the summaries are not accurate or need a teak - please DM so we can update
@rtenews@irishexaminer
https://t.co/W0tV9yIvao
@IrishMissionUN@dfatirl@HMcEntee Ireland does not comply w EU whistleblower protectives - so why signal these agreements
That’s the post
👇 is link to recent submittals to EU Whistleblower Protection Directive
w 57% of them from Ireland wow
@nypost@nytimes @
https://t.co/TujtUolY3L
@rtenews what about the safety to Irish citizens from Politicians, civil servants who when presented w overwhelming evidence by their own committee members, say as Mr McGrath did "nothing to see here"
why should anyone listen to him
@IrishTimes wow "failed" is such a strong statement to lead with
Unsuccessful in his bid for office, is maybe more appropriate
and kudos to @Nick_Delehanty and anyone of any party affiliation who put themselves out there in the public eye for election
@SamanthaLaDuc Samantha @MikeKellyPA PA to his credit was available for a meeting on the Hill as evidenced I this post we are copying 👇…. Very attentive & shocked at what he heard
https://t.co/GEuarLKwdZ
The that 57% of all submissions to EU Whistleblower Protection Directive were from Ireland is shocking ….
The majority would agree & say that such high levels from A country comprising 1.2% of the population are
Grotesque Unbelievable Bizarre & Unprecedented & worthy of an independent natural inquiry ( w independent EU, UK & usa members)
https://t.co/dh6MtOhuLV
UPDATE ON IRELAND’s JUDICIAL RESCUE SERVICE
🔹Since posting the thread yesterday, I have now received further reliable information regarding the same case, which raises another serious question about the accuracy of the published judgment.
🔹The claimant’s pleaded case described the original lending as multiple separate facilities, subsequently restructured, with the claim being advanced on the later restructuring documentation.
🔹However, I am reliably informed that during the hearing an earlier loan contract was actually opened to the Court which appears to show something materially different: just a single loan facility, rather than the multiple facilities described in the pleaded claim.
🔹The borrower expressly drew this discrepancy to the Court’s attention in rebuttal.
🔹Yet the published judgment apparently repeats the claimant’s description of the original lending as comprising multiple facilities, without addressing the earlier loan contract or explaining how these fundamentally different descriptions can be reconciled.
🔹This goes directly to the identification of the debt being pursued.
🔹The claimant needs to answer:
🔹If the contemporaneous loan agreement records one facility, what is the documentary basis for the claimant pleading multiple original facilities?
🔹The claimant also needs to explain:
🔹How does the single facility evidenced by the loan contract become the multiple facilities said to have been subsequently restructured?
🔹The judgment raises a different question for the Court:
🔹Why does the published account apparently repeat the claimant’s description of multiple facilities after a contradictory loan contract had been opened in court and the borrower had expressly drawn the discrepancy to the judge’s attention?
🔹And there is an even more fundamental question which the plenary proceedings must now answer:
🔹What, precisely, was the original debt?
🔹Before anyone can establish that an existing debt was subsequently restructured, assigned and ultimately became enforceable by another entity, - surely the starting point must be a coherent documentary identification of that original debt?
🔹The case is proceeding to a full plenary hearing, so the underlying liability remains to be determined.
🔹But that makes accuracy about what was pleaded, what was produced in evidence and what the underlying contract actually records more important, not less.
🔹And finally there is a larger question for the wider Irish legal and judicial establishment:
🔹Who out there is going to call this out?
🔹Our AG, our Minister for Justice, our Chief Justice?
🔹There comes a point when repeated discrepancies of this kind risk doing profound damage to public confidence in the administration of justice.
🔹The perception that something is badly wrong is no longer confined to lawyers or individual litigants.
🔹To quote the AG on “Anglo/Quinn” - the dogs in the street know there is a problem.
🔹Our courts risk becoming a laughing stock if obvious documentary contradictions are not confronted openly and rigorously and claimants can pursue invalid debts.
🔹This is where judges of integrity matter.
🔹The judiciary has the greatest interest in ensuring that judgments accurately reflect the evidence actually placed before the Court and that banks, credit servicers and ordinary citizens are held to the same evidential standards.
🔹Judges who care about the integrity and reputation of the Irish courts need to step up — and pronto.
🔹Because silence in the face of obvious documentary discrepancies protects neither the judiciary nor the administration of justice.
🔹The documentary record must govern.
🔹And this “judicial rescue service” being afforded to banks, vultures and credit servicers must immediately end.
This is an important post to share widely.
@Wftproof@ucddublin@ucdpolitics@tcddublin@KingsInns@LSRAIreland@lawsocgazette@LawSociety_NI@lawsocietyire@TheBarofNI@BarofIrelandVAS
Illegal Foreclosures
Have you seen and read the extensive content on our illegal foreclosures page
We are neglectful in not highlighting the incredible info the team has assembled there
Collating excellent work by Mr Ed Honohan, many news outlets and others on to this page for educational purposes
But the results are playing out in our courts
https://t.co/5QEtZt4pwf
The average viewer to our Official Ireland page is in the last 28 days spending 2.5 minutes on it according to our current google stats!
April 2017 - "Official ireland has absolutely and completely deastroyed the life of every whistleblower" @WhistleIRL
&
here we are Sept 2026 & Taoiseach pretends he is surprised and former Minister for Justice said " I followed the law" ...
Official Ireland; following delay, deny & destroy is more likely
The statisric 0suggests we need more content as its resonating with readers. We reformated a few items today, but if you want some correspondence there:
Send via dm or to [email protected]
https://t.co/H6ERpqyd61
Here is a link to Jonathan describing official Ireland accurately .. April 2017
Yet M Martin seemed surprised in the Dail last week or maybe he believes in the tooth fairy still if he thinks we believe him
One of many informative & insightful videos on our videos page
https://t.co/SvmluhkShg
@OpenJusticeIE@Polito_loco Can we share this on on our official Ireland page 👇…
Save in cloud and link to saved docs - similar to section starting at Human cost of Speaking out
https://t.co/rWoUsj9QIV
Damo this is a perfect example of what official Ireland does to whistleblowers - look for anything to destroy them
Thanks for sharing this example
We have no insight in to the post ( what happened) or history in content in RTE program just wanted to opine on the example
https://t.co/IQ3mvEWTod
Yes everyday until a full independent (w outside Ireland members) inquiry is conducted in public
The @DailyMail team @JohnEdwardLee has for years has written about Garda HSE Vat Fraud @ to their credit
Tne @IrishTimes has many articles about treatment of whistleblowers on our Official Ireland page
How much have law firms received annually to continue w delay deny & destroy? No
Consequences for the truth - they still get paid. So like legal aid - official Ireland legals get fixed fee only. Wonder if they spend as much time w delay then ?
There is NO accountability in Official Ireland that's the issue!o
The majority of the Govt voted 26 Nov 2025 to continue with No Accountibilty when they rejected the @independent_ire sponsored bill (apolgies if co sponsored to other opposition parties, many of whose members spoke very well that day in favor of accountability)
The judges nominated & interviewed in secret are all political appointees
Senan Allen for example: friend of Enda Kenny (“ got access to taoiseachs private bathroom” ) when he wrote his predetermined report ignoring witnesses, failing to research disclosures, agreeing w disclosures & ignoring that fact etc etc.
Enda ignored lack of independence in process when written to by committee member July 28 2015 … the houses of Oireachtas revised themselves. Well done
Allen then Nominated to bench by FG leader Leo
Others also had roles in the falsehoods & let’s say looked after
Usa model w public process may be painful for all ….. but conflicts explored not rewarded