Dan Thomas for Reform says that “almost 500,000 people” opposing a 20mph speed limit in Wales means they have a “democratic mandate” to reverse the limit because that’s “more people than voted Labour”. The population of Wales is 3.2 million. That’s not how democracy works. #bbcqt
@sarah02022020@yrubswed@davidkurten It’s not weak or inadequate. It just has a lower chance of killing the animal than other sorts of stunning. Still not a zero chance. Just lower.
@VictoriaCoren@Mirf_Chris@BBC@Nigel_Farage No point arguing with the trolls. They’re paid to do it and do it badly; the rest of us try to talk sense for free and wonder why the trolls don’t notice.
@bswud@MWHoyle19 He wasn’t punched in the head. Which isn’t a defence of what happened, but a material factor in the sentencing. Seems odd to lie about that, if you’re trying to suggest sentencing should be changed based on the actual circumstances and not the ones you’ve made up?
@VictoriaAtkins You see you went too quickly from the sensible-sounding bit at the start to the tribally silly party line at the end. Needed a bit in the middle to ease the transition.
While the false equivalence is laughable, the latest histrionics campaign from the right, in shining a spotlight on non-stun slaughter, is forcing scrutiny on the myth that halal is non-stun, which is something our press has refused to do for decades.
Dear Labour
If you really love the animals, you would immediately ban non-stun slaughter
Not only is it medieval and barbaric, but non-stun abbatoirs consistently fail across all standards of welfare and hygiene
But it's easier to go after British countryside pursuits than upset radical Islamists
[Many halal abbatoirs do stun before slaughter]
@daveatherton@salvationarmyuk @bb_media_uk Notably it’s the blue ticks endorsing this sort of racist unpleasantness. Nice to see that most normal folk are glad that people are doing nice things for people no matter where they’re from.
@philsrobinson@matoxley@SarahForRuncorn The Telegraph has long ago given up any semblance of respectability. If that’s what you’re trusting as your news source then you’d best hope that referring to strangers on the internet as babe achieves whatever it is you’re hoping it does…?
@dlongenecker1@wapella It is, and has always been taught as, a subtle satire of the excesses and entrenched class values of the US in the 20s.
I think a third read may be in order.