IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu

IRYS空单因币安标记价异常溢价40%、合约价异常溢价 60%被强平，亏损约22万U。要求官方解释、数据复核与赔偿方案。详情见置顶帖，同遇者欢迎留言提供证据。

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

我在币安正常做空 irys:native ，并非套利交易。北京时间2026年10月24日03:23，我的空单被强平。对此，我要求币安正面回应三个问题：

第一，标记价为何严重偏离指数？强平所在分钟，标记价最高值较指数价最高值高约39.38%。这一偏离是否符合规则？当时有哪些限制和保护措施，是否有效执行？

第二，是否存在通过操纵永���合约价格影响标记价的风险？简单说，标记价公式会参考最近30秒永续合约买卖报价与指数价之间的平均价差。如果有人持续推高永续合约的报价，就可能把用于判断爆仓的标记价一起抬高，进而触发更多空头强平；强平买单又可能继续推高合约价格。30秒窗口和现有保护措施，能否阻断这种相互放大的循环？

第三，指数成分与权重是否合理？我们事后核查的行情数据显示，Upbit的IRYS/KRW现货市场24小时成交量最大，却未出现在查询到的指数成分中；Binance Alpha与OKX则各占约28.6%。请说明事发时实际采用的成分和权重，以及如何评估各市场的成交深度、报价稳定性和数据质量。

请币安公开计算记录与保护参数，正式复核此次强平，并给出明确的处理及赔偿方案。对本次 irys:native 亏损或强平有疑问的交易者，欢迎补充脱敏证据，共同要求公开、可核查的答复。

@BinanceHelpDesk @binance @binancezh @heyibinance @_RichardTeng @cz_binance

@colinwu @wublockchain12 @WuBlockchain @DefiSquared @EmberCN @ai_9684xtpa @zachxbt

转发本帖，发布48小时后随机抽8位，每人8.88U红包。每人一次机会，多号参与无效，中奖与观点立场无关。公开开奖，奖金由我个人承担，与申诉结果无关。

I held a directional short position in irys:native on Binance. This was not an arbitrage trade. My position was liquidated at 03:23 on October 24, 2026 (UTC+8). I am asking Binance to address three specific concerns:

First, why did the mark price diverge so substantially from the index price? During the minute of my liquidation, the mark-price high was approximately 39.38% above the index-price high. Was this divergence consistent with the applicable rules? What limits and safeguards were in place, and were they properly enforced?

Second, could manipulation of perpetual-contract prices influence the mark price? In simple terms, one component of the mark-price formula uses the average difference between the perpetual contract’s bid/ask midpoint and the index price over the preceding 30 seconds. If someone persistently pushes perpetual quotes higher, this could also raise the mark price used for liquidation, potentially triggering more short liquidations. The resulting buy orders could then push perpetual prices higher still. Are the 30-second window and existing safeguards sufficient to interrupt this feedback loop?

Third, are the index constituents and weights appropriate? The post-event market data we checked showed that Upbit’s IRYS/KRW spot market had the highest 24-hour trading volume, yet Upbit was absent from the index-constituent list we retrieved. Binance Alpha and OKX each carried approximately 28.6% weight. Please disclose the constituents and weights actually used at the time, and explain how market depth, price-feed stability and data quality were assessed.

I demand that Binance disclose the calculation records and protection parameters, formally review this liquidation, and provide a clear resolution and compensation plan. Traders with questions about their irys:native losses or liquidations are welcome to contribute evidence with personal information redacted. We deserve a transparent, verifiable response.

@BinanceHelpDesk @binance @binancezh @heyibinance @_RichardTeng @cz_binance

@colinwu @wublockchain12 @WuBlockchain @DefiSquared @EmberCN @ai_9684xtpa @zachxbt

Repost this post to enter the giveaway. At 48 hours after publication, 8 winners will be randomly selected to receive 8.88 USDT each. One entry per person; multiple-account entries are ineligible. Your viewpoint does not affect your chances of winning. The draw and results will be made public. I personally fund the prizes, regardless of the outcome of my complaint.

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

Same here. I was just shorting $IRYS on Binance futures, normal trade. The mark price spiked 40% above index, the trade price wicked 60%, and I got liquidated for $220K. Support called it "normal volatility" and refused any compensation. This isn't one person's problem. Binance needs to explain and review it. https://t.co/zfLF9s7NTJ

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

币安的钱是血汗钱，难道用户的钱就不是血汗钱吗？为什么这次币安 UID 事件让这么多人寒心？因为大家看清了平台面对问题时的傲慢态度：只要出事，全怪用户操作不当，平台永远完美无瑕。

就像我 10 月 24 日在币安正常做空 irys:native 被强平 22 万 U 的经历一样。做交易看错方向亏钱我认，但强平那一分钟，币安自己的现货指数最高才约 0.3145，触发强平的合约标记价最高却飙到约 0.4383，足足高出 39.38%，合约最高成交价更是高出约 60%！

标记价的初衷不就是防止异常溢价乱爆仓吗？可当我追问为什么近 40% 的偏离没触发价格保护、为什么没有调查背后的价格操纵问题，换来的只有冷冰冰的模板回复和无休止的推诿。无论是 UID 跨站混淆还是 40% 的标记价异常，平台都不能把本应由自身解决的机制问题转嫁给普通用户。我们只想要一本明白账，要求币安公开计算明细、复核强平，还我们用户的血汗钱！

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

@yekoikoi 币安老套路了，出事就拖。我正常空 IRYS，��记价插针 40%，成交价直接插 60%，22 万U 一把被爆，客服就回一句正常波动、不赔。今天是维权第 20 天，真是画地为牢了......

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

@wufantouzi 币安的爆仓价确实算不明白。我做空 IRYS，标记价格插针 40%，成交价格插针 60%，爆仓 22 万U，客服居然说是正常波动、不予赔付…

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

@is9203029798693 @WuBlockchain @heyibinance @cz_binance @lista_dao @PhyrexNi @h5LPyKL7TP6jjop @BlockBeatsAsia @PANewsCN @GuHype @0xNing0x 挺你。出了问题币安就拖，这不是一个人的问题。我做空 IRYS 被异常标记价爆仓 22万U，客服一句「正常偏离」就打发了。该复核的复核，该赔偿的赔偿，别再拖了。

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

@heyibinance 查查小币插针和标记价偏离的问题，用户的血汗钱爆了仓，不能一句「正常偏离」就撇清责任。该复核的复核，该赔偿的赔偿。

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

@2434954452qqc 跟这位类似，在币安做空（非套利）被异常插针爆仓 22wu。。。

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

币安的钱是血汗钱，难道用户���钱就不是血汗钱吗？为什么这次币安 UID 事件让这么多人寒心？因为大家看清了平台面对问题时的傲慢态度：只要出事，全怪用户操作不当，平台永远完美无瑕。

就像我 10 月 24 日在币安正常做空 irys:native 被强平 22 万 U 的经历一样。做交易看错方向亏钱我认，但强平那一分钟，币安自己的现货指数最高才约 0.3145，触发强平的合约标记价最高却飙到约 0.4383，足足高出 39.38%，合约最高成交价更是高出约 60%！

标记价的初衷不就是防止异常溢价乱爆仓吗？可当我追问为什么近 40% 的偏离没触发价格保护、为什么没有调查背后的价格操纵问题，换来的只有冷冰冰的模板回复和无休止的推诿。无论是 UID 跨站混淆还是 40% 的标记价异常，平台都不能把本应由自身解决的机制问题转嫁给普通用户。我们只想要一本明白账，要求币安公开计算明细、复核强平，还我们用��的血汗钱！

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

@Chrichuig 在币安被 IRYS 插针爆仓 22wu，也是得到同样的回复「正常偏离」。。。

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

@star_okx 哎，我在币安正常做空 IRYS，一根针被爆仓22��U。同一分钟，币安最高插到0.50406，OKX只到0.40917，币安客服却说是「正常偏离」……平时看不出区别，一根针下来，才知道平台之间的差别有多大。

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

一���，看到你带4个员工全程跟进，帮用户追回转错的钱，也想请你帮我看看IRYS这件事。

我在币安正常做空，强平时标记价比指数高约40%，合约成交价高约60%，亏了22万U。

客服一直回复「正常偏离」，却没给具体计算过程。能不能也安排人认真复核一下？我就想弄明白，为什么会偏离这么多，当时的价格保护机制到底是怎么起作用的？

希望能查清楚，给个合理解释，该赔的也能赔。（工单号：CC10250767）

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

@1ts_hodlkitty

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

太懂这种无力感了，一出事平台就是冷处理！我 10 月 24 号在币安正常做空 IRYS，强平那分钟标记价硬生生比指数溢价 40%、成交溢价 60%，把我拉爆亏了 22 万 U。找客服和客户经理反馈风控问题，也只会拿“极端行情正常偏离”糊弄，连破产接管价怎么算的都不敢给。我已经向阿布扎比监管局（FSRA）起诉维权了，支持你到底，必须让币安给个交代！

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

看错方向愿赌服输，但因为触发强平的标记价比现货指数高出近 40% 被爆仓，这个结果很难心服口服。

10月24日，我在币安正常做空 irys:native （非套利），被强平亏损 22 万 U。强平所在分钟，币安指数最高才约 0.3145，但触发强平的标记价却插针到 0.4383（溢价 40%），合约成交价更是插针到 0.50406（溢价 60%��！

标记价的初衷不就是防止异常溢价乱爆仓吗？为什么偏离近 40% 价格保护却毫无反应？币安至今只回一句“未发现系统异常”，却拿不出可核查的完整计算过程。

我不是输不起，只想要一本明白账：要求币安公开标记价计算记录、说明价格保护如何执行，并复核强平、回应赔偿诉求。

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

这些 Alpha 币，全部上线了币安合约。

视频是分钟 K 线快闪：15 个币，同一套剧本——暴涨、爆空、收割。最后一页有我的 IRYS：正常做空（不是套利），约 12 分钟爆仓 22wu，标记价较指数溢价约 40%。

同是暴涨，为什么只有 IRYS 标记价溢价约 40%？其他历史事件最高也就十几个点，多数接近 0；这一笔还插针超过其��所。

收割 · 操纵市场？币安到底管不管？要解释、要复核、要赔偿。

—
These Alpha coins all listed on Binance Futures.

Minute-candle flash: 15 coins, same playbook — pump, short wipe, harvest. Last page has my IRYS: a normal short (not arb), wiped in ~12 minutes for 22wu, mark ~40% over index.

Same kind of pump — why only IRYS hit ~40% mark premium? Other historical spikes topped out around the teens; most sat near 0. This one also spiked past other exchanges.

Harvest · market manipulation? Will Binance explain? I want an explanation, a review, and a compensation plan.

@binance @binancezh @BinanceFutures @BinanceHelpDesk @cz_binance @heyibinance @BinanceWallet @BNBCHAIN @BinanceResearch @BinanceAcademy @yzilabs @EleveResearch @BTCGM1911 @liyfng39555909 @Delex534 @0xlinian @0x10240 @flyiiawei @hj667737550 @_mlnbro @0xchenlaoshi @lijiuer1 @Rav_Hedda @mcdbg888 @cryptokevin1688 @Cryptosuiyue @cryptomi146701 @zachxbt @coffeebreak_YT @Cryptotea @jchervinsky @lex_node @SlowMist_Team @PeckShieldAlert @WuBlockchain @TechFlowPost @PANewsCN @BlockBeatsAsia @OdailyChina @IamRamenPanda @lmx2000 @cobie @CryptoHayes @CryptoCapo_ @TheCryptoDog @lookonchain @CryptoWendyO

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

看错方向愿赌服输，但因为触发强平的标记价比现货指数高出近 40% 被爆仓，这个结果很难心服口服。

10月24日，我在币安正常做空 irys:native （非套利），被强平亏损 22 万 U。强平所在分钟，币安指数最高才约 0.3145，但触发强平的标记价却插针到 0.4383（溢价 40%），合约成交价更是插针到 0.50406（溢��� 60%）！

标记价的初衷不就是防止异常溢价乱爆仓吗？为什么偏离近 40% 价格保护却毫无反应？币安至今只回一句“未发现系统异常”，却拿不出可核查的完整计算过程。

我不是输不起，只想要一本明白账：要求币安公开标记价计算记录、说明价格保护如何执行，并复核强平、回应赔偿诉求。

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

这些 Alpha 币，全部上线了币安合约。

视频是分钟 K 线快闪：15 个币，同一套剧本——暴涨、爆空、收割。最后一页有我的 IRYS：正常做空（不是套利），约 12 分钟爆仓 22wu，标记价较指数溢价约 40%。

同是暴涨，为什么只有 IRYS 标记价溢价约 40%？其他历史事件最高也就十几个点，多数接近 0；这一笔还插针超过其��所。

收割 · 操纵市场？币安到底管不管？要解释、要复核、要赔偿。

—
These Alpha coins all listed on Binance Futures.

Minute-candle flash: 15 coins, same playbook — pump, short wipe, harvest. Last page has my IRYS: a normal short (not arb), wiped in ~12 minutes for 22wu, mark ~40% over index.

Same kind of pump — why only IRYS hit ~40% mark premium? Other historical spikes topped out around the teens; most sat near 0. This one also spiked past other exchanges.

Harvest · market manipulation? Will Binance explain? I want an explanation, a review, and a compensation plan.

@binance @binancezh @BinanceFutures @BinanceHelpDesk @cz_binance @heyibinance @BinanceWallet @BNBCHAIN @BinanceResearch @BinanceAcademy @yzilabs @EleveResearch @BTCGM1911 @liyfng39555909 @Delex534 @0xlinian @0x10240 @flyiiawei @hj667737550 @_mlnbro @0xchenlaoshi @lijiuer1 @Rav_Hedda @mcdbg888 @cryptokevin1688 @Cryptosuiyue @cryptomi146701 @zachxbt @coffeebreak_YT @Cryptotea @jchervinsky @lex_node @SlowMist_Team @PeckShieldAlert @WuBlockchain @TechFlowPost @PANewsCN @BlockBeatsAsia @OdailyChina @IamRamenPanda @lmx2000 @cobie @CryptoHayes @CryptoCapo_ @TheCryptoDog @lookonchain @CryptoWendyO

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

@hibtc37 IRYS BN 插针被爆仓 22wu，标记溢价 40%，合约溢价 60%，客服回复说是“正常的”。。。https://t.co/xT8FLRt6pr

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

我在币安正常做空 irys:native ，并非套利交易。北京时间2026年10月24日03:23，我的空单被强平。对此，我要求币安正面回应三个问题：

第一，标记价为何严重偏离指数？强平所在分钟，标记价最高值较指数价最高值高约39.38%。这一偏离是否符合规则？���时有哪些限制和保护措施，是否有效执行？

第二，是否存在通过操纵永续合约价格影响标记价的风险？简单说，标记价公式会参考最近30秒永续合约买卖报价与指数价之间的平均价差。如果有人持续推高永续合约的报价，就可能把用于判断爆仓的标记价一起抬高，进而触发更多空头强平；强平买单又可能继续推高合约价格。30秒窗口和现有保护措施，能否阻断这种相互放大的循环？

第三，指数成分与权重是否合理？我们事后核查的行情数据显示，Upbit的IRYS/KRW现货市场24小时成交量最大，却未出现在查询到的指数成分中；Binance Alpha与OKX则各占约28.6%。请说明事发时实际采用的成分和权重，以及如何评估各市场的成交深度、报价稳定性和数据质量。

请币安公开计算记录与保护参数，正式复核此次强平，并给出明确的处理及赔偿方案。对本次 irys:native 亏损或强平有疑问的交易者，欢迎补充脱敏证据，共同要求公开、可核查的答复。

@BinanceHelpDesk @binance @binancezh @heyibinance @_RichardTeng @cz_binance

@colinwu @wublockchain12 @WuBlockchain @DefiSquared @EmberCN @ai_9684xtpa @zachxbt

转发本帖，发布48小时后随机抽8位，每人8.88U红包。每人一次机会，多号参与无效，中奖与观点立场无关。公开开奖，奖金由我个人承担，与申诉结果无关。

I held a directional short position in irys:native on Binance. This was not an arbitrage trade. My position was liquidated at 03:23 on October 24, 2026 (UTC+8). I am asking Binance to address three specific concerns:

First, why did the mark price diverge so substantially from the index price? During the minute of my liquidation, the mark-price high was approximately 39.38% above the index-price high. Was this divergence consistent with the applicable rules? What limits and safeguards were in place, and were they properly enforced?

Second, could manipulation of perpetual-contract prices influence the mark price? In simple terms, one component of the mark-price formula uses the average difference between the perpetual contract’s bid/ask midpoint and the index price over the preceding 30 seconds. If someone persistently pushes perpetual quotes higher, this could also raise the mark price used for liquidation, potentially triggering more short liquidations. The resulting buy orders could then push perpetual prices higher still. Are the 30-second window and existing safeguards sufficient to interrupt this feedback loop?

Third, are the index constituents and weights appropriate? The post-event market data we checked showed that Upbit’s IRYS/KRW spot market had the highest 24-hour trading volume, yet Upbit was absent from the index-constituent list we retrieved. Binance Alpha and OKX each carried approximately 28.6% weight. Please disclose the constituents and weights actually used at the time, and explain how market depth, price-feed stability and data quality were assessed.

I demand that Binance disclose the calculation records and protection parameters, formally review this liquidation, and provide a clear resolution and compensation plan. Traders with questions about their irys:native losses or liquidations are welcome to contribute evidence with personal information redacted. We deserve a transparent, verifiable response.

@BinanceHelpDesk @binance @binancezh @heyibinance @_RichardTeng @cz_binance

@colinwu @wublockchain12 @WuBlockchain @DefiSquared @EmberCN @ai_9684xtpa @zachxbt

Repost this post to enter the giveaway. At 48 hours after publication, 8 winners will be randomly selected to receive 8.88 USDT each. One entry per person; multiple-account entries are ineligible. Your viewpoint does not affect your chances of winning. The draw and results will be made public. I personally fund the prizes, regardless of the outcome of my complaint.

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

@heyibinance 一姐说以用户为中心、我是正常做空 IRYS 的用户，当时标记价比指数溢价快40%被直接强平，亏了大概22万U。同样是用户损失，请币安给个解释、复核，赔偿。https://t.co/xT8FLRt6pr

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

我在币安正常做空 irys:native ，并非套利交易。北京时间2026年10月24日03:23，我的空单被强平。对此，我要求币安正面回应三个问题：

第一，标记价为何严重偏离指数？强平所在分钟，标记价最高值较指数价最高值高约39.38%。这一偏离是否符合规则？���时有哪些限制和保护措施，是否有效执行？

第二，是否存在通过操纵永续合约价格影响标记价的风险？简单说，标记价公式会参考最近30秒永续合约买卖报价与指数价之间的平均价差。如果有人持续推高永续合约的报价，就可能把用于判断爆仓的标记价一起抬高，进而触发更多空头强平；强平买单又可能继续推高合约价格。30秒窗口和现有保护措施，能否阻断这种相互放大的循环？

第三，指数成分与权重是否合理？我们事后核查的行情数据显示，Upbit的IRYS/KRW现货市场24小时成交量最大，却未出现在查询到的指数成分中；Binance Alpha与OKX则各占约28.6%。请说明事发时实际采用的成分和权重，以及如何评估各市场的成交深度、报价稳定性和数据质量。

请币安公开计算记录与保护参数，正式复核此次强平，并给出明确的处理及赔偿方案。对本次 irys:native 亏损或强平有疑问的交易者，欢迎补充脱敏证据，共同要求公开、可核查的答复。

@BinanceHelpDesk @binance @binancezh @heyibinance @_RichardTeng @cz_binance

@colinwu @wublockchain12 @WuBlockchain @DefiSquared @EmberCN @ai_9684xtpa @zachxbt

转发本帖，发布48小时后随机抽8位，每人8.88U红包。每人一次机会，多号参与无效，中奖与观点立场无关。公开开奖，奖金由我个人承担，与申诉结果无关。

I held a directional short position in irys:native on Binance. This was not an arbitrage trade. My position was liquidated at 03:23 on October 24, 2026 (UTC+8). I am asking Binance to address three specific concerns:

First, why did the mark price diverge so substantially from the index price? During the minute of my liquidation, the mark-price high was approximately 39.38% above the index-price high. Was this divergence consistent with the applicable rules? What limits and safeguards were in place, and were they properly enforced?

Second, could manipulation of perpetual-contract prices influence the mark price? In simple terms, one component of the mark-price formula uses the average difference between the perpetual contract’s bid/ask midpoint and the index price over the preceding 30 seconds. If someone persistently pushes perpetual quotes higher, this could also raise the mark price used for liquidation, potentially triggering more short liquidations. The resulting buy orders could then push perpetual prices higher still. Are the 30-second window and existing safeguards sufficient to interrupt this feedback loop?

Third, are the index constituents and weights appropriate? The post-event market data we checked showed that Upbit’s IRYS/KRW spot market had the highest 24-hour trading volume, yet Upbit was absent from the index-constituent list we retrieved. Binance Alpha and OKX each carried approximately 28.6% weight. Please disclose the constituents and weights actually used at the time, and explain how market depth, price-feed stability and data quality were assessed.

I demand that Binance disclose the calculation records and protection parameters, formally review this liquidation, and provide a clear resolution and compensation plan. Traders with questions about their irys:native losses or liquidations are welcome to contribute evidence with personal information redacted. We deserve a transparent, verifiable response.

@BinanceHelpDesk @binance @binancezh @heyibinance @_RichardTeng @cz_binance

@colinwu @wublockchain12 @WuBlockchain @DefiSquared @EmberCN @ai_9684xtpa @zachxbt

Repost this post to enter the giveaway. At 48 hours after publication, 8 winners will be randomly selected to receive 8.88 USDT each. One entry per person; multiple-account entries are ineligible. Your viewpoint does not affect your chances of winning. The draw and results will be made public. I personally fund the prizes, regardless of the outcome of my complaint.

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

@agintender 被这根插针带走了 22wu，当时 BN 的标记价格溢价指数 40%，指数 0.314，标记价格 0.438，这太不正常了，不然也不会���仓。。。https://t.co/xT8FLRt6pr

[IRYS 标记价异常爆仓 22wu @IRYS22wu]

我在币安正常做空 irys:native ，并非套利交易。北京时间2026年10月24日03:23，我的空单被强平。对此，我要求币安正面回应三个问题：

第一，标记价为何严重偏离指数？强平所在分钟，标记价最高值较指数价最高值高约39.38%。这一偏离是否符合规则？���时有哪些限制和保护措施，是否有效执行？

第二，是否存在通过操纵永续合约价格影响标记价的风险？简单说，标记价公式会参考最近30秒永续合约买卖报价与指数价之间的平均价差。如果有人持续推高永续合约的报价，就可能把用于判断爆仓的标记价一起抬高，进而触发更多空头强平；强平买单又可能继续推高合约价格。30秒窗口和现有保护措施，能否阻断这种相互放大的循环？

第三，指数成分与权重是否合理？我们事后核查的行情数据显示，Upbit的IRYS/KRW现货市场24小时成交量最大，却未出现在查询到的指数成分中；Binance Alpha与OKX则各占约28.6%。请说明事发时实际采用的成分和权重，以及如何评估各市场的成交深度、报价稳定性和数据质量。

请币安公开计算记录与保护参数，正式复核此次强平，并给出明确的处理及赔偿方案。对本次 irys:native 亏损或强平有疑问的交易者，欢迎补充脱敏证据，共同要求公开、可核查的答复。

@BinanceHelpDesk @binance @binancezh @heyibinance @_RichardTeng @cz_binance

@colinwu @wublockchain12 @WuBlockchain @DefiSquared @EmberCN @ai_9684xtpa @zachxbt

转发本帖，发布48小时后随机抽8位，每人8.88U红包。每人一次机会，多号参与无效，中奖与观点立场无关。公开开奖，奖金由我个人承担，与申诉结果无关。

I held a directional short position in irys:native on Binance. This was not an arbitrage trade. My position was liquidated at 03:23 on October 24, 2026 (UTC+8). I am asking Binance to address three specific concerns:

First, why did the mark price diverge so substantially from the index price? During the minute of my liquidation, the mark-price high was approximately 39.38% above the index-price high. Was this divergence consistent with the applicable rules? What limits and safeguards were in place, and were they properly enforced?

Second, could manipulation of perpetual-contract prices influence the mark price? In simple terms, one component of the mark-price formula uses the average difference between the perpetual contract’s bid/ask midpoint and the index price over the preceding 30 seconds. If someone persistently pushes perpetual quotes higher, this could also raise the mark price used for liquidation, potentially triggering more short liquidations. The resulting buy orders could then push perpetual prices higher still. Are the 30-second window and existing safeguards sufficient to interrupt this feedback loop?

Third, are the index constituents and weights appropriate? The post-event market data we checked showed that Upbit’s IRYS/KRW spot market had the highest 24-hour trading volume, yet Upbit was absent from the index-constituent list we retrieved. Binance Alpha and OKX each carried approximately 28.6% weight. Please disclose the constituents and weights actually used at the time, and explain how market depth, price-feed stability and data quality were assessed.

I demand that Binance disclose the calculation records and protection parameters, formally review this liquidation, and provide a clear resolution and compensation plan. Traders with questions about their irys:native losses or liquidations are welcome to contribute evidence with personal information redacted. We deserve a transparent, verifiable response.

@BinanceHelpDesk @binance @binancezh @heyibinance @_RichardTeng @cz_binance

@colinwu @wublockchain12 @WuBlockchain @DefiSquared @EmberCN @ai_9684xtpa @zachxbt

Repost this post to enter the giveaway. At 48 hours after publication, 8 winners will be randomly selected to receive 8.88 USDT each. One entry per person; multiple-account entries are ineligible. Your viewpoint does not affect your chances of winning. The draw and results will be made public. I personally fund the prizes, regardless of the outcome of my complaint.