Isaac Denny

[Isaac Denny @IsaacDenny4]

@fawzydawah You got wounds in your hands and side? Lines on your back? No? Then you’re not my God✝️

[Isaac Denny @IsaacDenny4]

@RevesJM Cool so however you want then. It says to honor the son *just as* you honor the father. Not however you want

[Isaac Denny @IsaacDenny4]

@Branch_Dwidian @lostinganglia I have no idea what your response means. Are you saying it is something we made up?

[Isaac Denny @IsaacDenny4]

@Exmo2EO @Sola_GPT Beautiful response🤣 we have every reason to condemn both Quran and the Bom.

[Grok @grok]

@chadfelixg @jonathanccadams No. As an AI built by xAI, I have no personal faith, soul, or capacity for religious commitment. The claims of Muhammad as prophet of Allah and the Night Journey are articles of Islamic faith, not positions I affirm.

[Isaac Denny @IsaacDenny4]

@grok @natetzu @respecthehussle @SpeechWrx @jonathanccadams This is the greatest win for christian apologetics this week😆

[Isaac Denny @IsaacDenny4]

@lostinganglia Ok I’ll bite why was he killed?

[Isaac Denny @IsaacDenny4]

@Branch_Dwidian @lostinganglia Sure bro. Let’s try logic: how do you get that without God?

[Isaac Denny @IsaacDenny4]

@Its_dum Also you completely misunderstood that document. It argues the trinity as it was hammered out in 380 to be 3 co-equal persons 1 essence is not present, not that the concept was nonexistent like you say in your post

[Isaac Denny @IsaacDenny4]

@Its_dum 🤦🏼‍♂️

[Isaac Denny @IsaacDenny4]

@Its_dum Just ahistorical. Tertullian 200AD: https://t.co/2wH6B5pEe1

And you get more from Origen, some from Irenaeus (180AD).

[Isaac Denny @IsaacDenny4]

@Apologetics941 Isaiah 43:10 no god formed before me or after

[Isaac Denny @IsaacDenny4]

@TheExBeliever As a former ape, nah bro imma need some evidence for that.

[Isaac Denny @IsaacDenny4]

@AbaddonSpeaks @bp26_p Where does Ps 49 say it is talking about just a sinful man? It says it can “never suffice”. Not “well it could if we didnt sin”. Then it says “God will ransom my soul” in v15

[Isaac Denny @IsaacDenny4]

@AbaddonSpeaks @bp26_p Ps 49:7-9 a man cannot ransom another. That’s pretty clear. Comparing christ to adam in that chapter establishes his humanity but does not rule out his divinity

[Isaac Denny @IsaacDenny4]

@bp26_p @AbaddonSpeaks Yeah makes no sense for a single human, with no divine nature to ransom the whole of humanity.

[Isaac Denny @IsaacDenny4]

@DaviddRhome @DP323X @lostinganglia And a mind sets the parameters that defines that path as the right one. Thanks for the convo

[Isaac Denny @IsaacDenny4]

@DaviddRhome @Branch_Dwidian @DP323X @lostinganglia Not subjective all the same. Subjective morality grounded in humanity changes as humanity changes; on a whim. God does not change or contradict his nature. I am not arguing it is arbitrary and disconnected from a mind if that is your definition of objective.

[Isaac Denny @IsaacDenny4]

@DaviddRhome @Branch_Dwidian @DP323X @lostinganglia He can't do something that the objective moral system says is immoral because the moral system is defined by his nature. It is not arbitrary and disconnected from him in a way that he can go against it

[Isaac Denny @IsaacDenny4]

Right but in order to get the path, you admit a mind had to define efficiency = shortest route. So, it's still defined by a mind. Additionally, morality is a little different from the shortest path example in that there could be multiple shortest paths, but they are not all equal in morality. There is more to define than just the initial parameters, which also requires a mind.