@MyWenisGenius14@AmadeusBolshev they can take their money but they can't take the resources, infrastructure or people. what they would be taking would be things they already weren't investing in the people, not a big loss
@pit__roig@comradenyan@quercinus si veig una persona amb la pulsereta d'espanya probablement ja sé quin peu calça. a més, falta context al vídeo, ja que a la primera dona ja li han dit que han fet algun comentari. sionisme no és judaisme. els jueus que es manifesten contra israel són antisemites?
@GODINISMO93 participaciones de gol de jugadores españoles en el madrid esta temporada: 29
en el atleti: 34
en el villarreal: 64
en el barça: 141
hay niveles
@kaylapop_@cor2d2@_CM_67_ it's not like people are born loving their cars. people grow up in an environment designed for car specific transportation, so they love their cars because it lets them go places
@NotoriousProCuk@electionsjoe reach, but them being too powerful to prosecute is not legal argument. the fact that the hague invasion act exists only proves my point. if the u.s. actions couldn't be considered war crimes, the u.s. would need a law that allows them to invade a country to avoid a trial. if it +
@NotoriousProCuk@electionsjoe was just "a security blanket", why would they need it? why would putin avoid travelling to south africa in 2023? yes, you're right, the u.s. is too big to be bullied, but you're wrong in thinking that makes the rules not exist. a crime is still a crime even if it's not prosecuted