@ScienceQriosity@GadSaad@RichardDawkins Actually, Leslie Orgel invented the term and William Dembski developed and popularized its use in Intelligent Design.
I have no idea what percentage of fossils have been found and neither does anyone else. Certainly I have some genetic defects which probably decrease my life expectancy. As these genetic deficiencies increase and propagate throughout the human species they will result in the extinction of the species not the evolution of some other species.
Look, I’m it going to convince you and you’re not going to convert me. And it’s a matter of conversion, because evolution is a matter of faith. You believe in evolution because you want to believe in evolution not because of the evidence. The evidence for evolution is not there. (And the top scientists know it.) I choose not to believe in evolution because the evidence is not there. There is far more evidence of design in nature than there is for evolution.
Here we go, the “artifact” argument. “They’re out there somewhere, we just haven’t found them yet.” Should be millions of them. And this just one line of argument against evolution. Random genetic variation working with “natural” selection does not have the explanatory power to account for the incredible complexity of even the simplest life form. Neo-Darwinism simply can not work. Mutations in nature result death, not in new species.
It is not a question of a “missing link.” It is a question of millions of “missing links.” If evolution were such a seminal fact of the biological history of this planet, there should be millions of examples of “transitional” life forms preserved in the fossil record, but there are essentially none. (I can think of one disputed example, the Archaeopteryx, which I say it’s just an unusual extinct species.) Macroevolution, one species evolving into another species, has never been conclusively observed in nature. Micro-evolution, changes within a species, has been observed.
I was always thought he was funny. I’d like to know the full context of his comment about Charlie Kirk’s murder before I pass judgement. In general, I’m horrified by the joking about and mocking of Charlie Kirk’s brutal murder that is regularly reported. Celebrating Charlie Kirk’s murder is deranged. The people doing it all vote Democratic.
If Walter Cronkite rose from the dead and presented irrefutable evidence of voter fraud to the President, Congress, and the Supreme Court, I doubt anything would be done. The corruption is that deep.
The Democrats will bring you two years of non-stop ‘get Trump.’ (And they’ll fail at that, again.) Tens of millions of taxpayer dollars wasted on vindictive lawfare while the actual problems facing the nation get ignored. Mark my words: they will improve nothing. They will only make things worse.