@BlokeMan00 Re: "Imagine spacetime as a rubber sheet held together by invisible quantum "threads" (entanglement links)."
How do you justify the illogical conclusion of SPACETIME that says two observers (frames) moving away from each other are BOTH centered in a single spherical wave?
Re: "Galilean relativity assumes absolute time and no invariant speed."
I talking about Professor Klinaku's extended Galilean relativity.
Re: "Maxwell’s equations contradict both assumptions."
I don't care about the "Maxwell equations" without Maxwell's theory.
Re: "The Lorentz group is the unique symmetry of electromagnetism, and it cannot be derived from classical wave mechanics in a medium.""
Correct and that's OK.
Wave Mechanics without a wave medium is retarded.
@germanophile@PhysInHistory Re: "Classical electro theory contained the seeds of both QED and SR!"
No. You must give up basic logic to believe in Einstein's fantasy physics lies.
That's the real change between modern and classical. Believe in the lies...or not.
@germanophile@PhysInHistory Re: "Relativity is much bigger and older than Einstein."
Yes, you just have to recognize that the common Galilean relativity is a specific case. When Galilean relativity is generalized in polar coordinate, you get the Doppler Effect of the wave medium.
It's all classical.
Both of them will probably start out by telling lies about the famous "double slit" experiment and "which-way" did the "light particle" go.
Realize that is another Einstein thought experiment that ruined good, scientific physics. There is no "which-way" detector, nor is there a truly defined "single photon" or "single electron" that doesn't rely on particle interpretations of experiments (thermionic and photo electric effects).
The entire particle realm requires you to assume "particle", since there is no electromagnetic wave-medium. That's all Einstein lies.
Both of them will probably start out by telling lies about the famous "double slit" experiment and "which-way" did the "light particle" go.
Realize that is another Einstein thought experiment that ruined good, scientific physics. There is no "which-way" detector, nor is there a truly defined "single photon" or "single electron" that doesn't rely on particle interpretations of experiments (thermionic and photo electric effects).
The entire particle realm requires you to assume "particle", since there is no electromagnetic wave-medium. That's all Einstein lies.
@germanophile@PhysInHistory Re: "He did not interpret it physically."
Correct.
Re: "He did not derive the Lorentz group."
Correct. Lucky for Voigt!!
Re: "He did not connect it to relativity, simultaneity, or Maxwell’s full symmetry!"
Correct. Again, lucky for Voigt! It's all Doppler Effects!
Re: "Voigt’s 1887 transformation is conformal, not metric‑preserving, and does not form a group."
That is the feature! The "group" is considered Einstein's novel prediction of non-preferred reference frame -- "mutual time dilation" illogic. 😂
Re: "This symmetry is what Minkowski geometrised"
Yes, this creates the illogic of SPACETIME: two observers moving away from each other are BOTH centered in a single spherical wave!
Did you really give up on basic logic because of Einsteiner lies?
Re: "Voigt’s 1887 transformation is conformal, not metric‑preserving, and does not form a group."
That is the feature! The "group" is considered Einstein's novel prediction of non-preferred reference frame -- "mutual time dilation" illogic. 😂
Re: "This symmetry is what Minkowski geometrised"
Yes, this creates the illogic of SPACETIME: two observers moving away from each other are BOTH centered in a single spherical wave!
Did you really give up on basic logic because of Einsteiner lies?
@mysticinthemoon Law of One material is really good.
You should really read it sometime. Not just the Ra channelings but the group meditations of Hatton and Latwii.
@oprydai Re: "quantum mechanics says the atom can be in superposition: decayed and not decayed."
This "state superposition" is nonsense and made-up.
Schrodinger is making fun of the ridiculousness that Max Born's ad-hoc rule and "state superposition" create by using the cat analogy.
@oprydai Re: "quantum mechanics says the atom can be in superposition: decayed and not decayed."
This "state superposition" is nonsense and made-up.
Schrodinger is making fun of the ridiculousness that Max Born's ad-hoc rule and "state superposition" create by using the cat analogy.
@PhysInHistory Maxwell's equations without the wave medium (post-Einstein) lose all meaning.
Dielectric displacement without the wave medium is an imposter to the true dielectric elasticity and dielectric polarization effects.
And Maxwell's Dielectric displacement predicted radio waves!