Russophobius Maximus ๐ณ๐ฑ๐บ๐ฆ๐ธ๐ช๐ซ๐ท๐ฎ๐น๐ฉ๐ฐ
@germanophile
๐ซถ๐บ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต๐ฌ๐ช
Euro-diversity enjoyer
not here to save the world
๐ picked lives matter
MMAGA Make Marie Antoinette Great Again
tankie IQ=64
๐ฎ๐ท๐บ๐บ๐ธ๐ฐ๐ต
@charlesmurray Irony is, Ehrmanโs entire historicalโJesus thesis is that Jesus was an apocalyptic prophet.
Yet when he dates Mark, he suddenly treats one apocalyptic saying (โnot one stone will be left on anotherโ) as if it were a literal, precise, historicallyโinformed description of 70 CE!
@charlesmurray Irony is, Ehrmanโs entire historicalโJesus thesis is that Jesus was an apocalyptic prophet.
Yet when he dates Mark, he suddenly treats one apocalyptic saying (โnot one stone will be left on anotherโ) as if it were a literal, precise, historicallyโinformed description of 70 CE!
@athiestboi For more than 2000 years astronomers believed that planets move naturally in circles and thus required no cause. Kepler who was motivated by his theological mechanics proposed that planets required a cause. Naturalism never gave us causal astronomy, theological mechanics did.
@ICRscience YEC treat Earthโs magnetic field as if it were a simple bar magnet that is running down. If that were true, then yes couldnโt last billions of years.
But Earthโs field is not a permanent magnet. It is generated by fluid motion in the liquid outer core, a selfโsustaining dynamo.
@ttttddfgghyt@RolloRouen Irving blames the disaster on east on generals, when after 1942, Hitler was one driving, from 1942 Hitler was a gift to the red army. Hitler personally split Army Group South into Army Group A and Army Group B. This violated the core German operational principle of Schwerpunkt
@ttttddfgghyt@RolloRouen Irving seized on dubious fragments to exonerate Hitler while ignoring or twisting stronger evidence against him.
Also you do know that Spengler absolutely loathed Hitler? lol
@Briankeating Darwin inherited what, in Kant, was only an epistemological limit, and he reified it into a metaphysical thesis about nature itself.
Irony: what Kant treated as a ๐ค๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ด๐ต๐ณ๐ข๐ช๐ฏ๐ต ๐ฐ๐ฏ ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ ๐ค๐ฐ๐จ๐ฏ๐ช๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ, Darwinism treats as a ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฑ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ต๐บ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ธ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ญ๐ฅ.
@Its_BS@PhysInHistory Galilean relativity assumes absolute time and no invariant speed. Maxwellโs equations contradict both assumptions. The Lorentz group is the unique symmetry of electromagnetism, and it cannot be derived from classical wave mechanics in a medium.
@Its_BS@PhysInHistory It is the structure of the universe that facilitates our understanding. The elliptical orbit guided Kepler who was bridge to Newton, Maxwell modelled his theory on Newton. Classical electro theory contained the seeds of both QED and SR!
@Its_BS@PhysInHistory Voigt introduced local time as a mathematical device to keep the form of the wave equation under a conformal transformation. He did not interpret it physically.
He did not derive the Lorentz group.
He did not connect it to relativity, simultaneity, or Maxwellโs full symmetry!
@ICRscience YEC treat Earthโs magnetic field as if it were a bar magnet that is simply โrunning downโ exponentially.
But Earthโs field is not a permanent magnet. It is generated by fluid motion in the liquid outer core, a selfโsustaining dynamo.
@ICRscience Big Bang cosmology is not Darwinian evolution, and it is misleading to lump them together.
Big Bang cosmology is teleological, constraintโdriven, topโdown.
Darwinian evolution is nonโteleological, contingent, bottomโup.
Big bang is a well-supported teleological model.