@lisaknows429 She read the report. She didnāt spin anything. Itās all in there. You are the one doing the spinning. How much do the little hats pay you?
@Robbiemeep@lisaknows429 Looks really bad on TPUSA for stating multiple times they didnāt want ANYONE on the hall of flags building. Anyone up there would have seen the fed shooter.
You canāt ignore the inconsistencies in the Lindsay Clancy case:
Credit to Alexus Savant (1/4) š§µ
Iām not saying that Patrick Clancy drugged his wife for months leading up to the murder of his children, drugged her heavily the night of, killed the kids, slit her throat and wrists, left for an alibi, came back and saw she was still alive so he threw her out the windowā¦. But Iām also NOT NOT saying that⦠because his testimony DOES NOT ADD UP!!!!
Hereās some of my theoryās/evidence on this case:
1. I think heās a sociopath. I think thatās why Lindsay googled if sociopaths can be treated. She wasnāt talking about herself. He shows zero emotions on the stand, literally looks bored and annoyed while describing the murder of his children, zero tears, not even when the 911 call played in court. Meanwhile Lindsay is in there sobbing hysterically every day.
2. In the 911 call he says āShe killed the fucking kids!ā Who calls their children, who are now dead, āthe fucking kidsā ??? Honestly think about how youād react in that situation. Would you say that? Or would you be saying āmy babies, oh my god my babiesā or something similar?
3. This man was going on trips regularly, guys nights, brunches etc., while his wife is having severe enough mental health problems to be repeatedly committed. My husband wouldnāt even do that if I had THE FLU.
4. Heās only testifying for the defense because heās suing the doctors that prescribed her meds for millions.
5. Lindsayās wrists were cut horizontally. She was a nurse. Why would she cut the wrong way? Just to then launch herself out of a window? Also, women usually do not use gruesome methods to commit suicide. She had access to medications that she couldāve easily taken an entire bottle of to kill herself. But Patrick wouldnāt be able to drug her with enough of it to kill her without her noticing it in foods or drinks.
6. Prosecutors stated there were blood smears outside the window, under it, on the siding of the house. Meaning she didnāt jump out of the window. She slid out of the window. Kinda like somebody would do if they were limp from being drugged and blood loss, and were being pushed out of a window by another person? Also she landed on her back. If you jumped out, how tf would you land on your back? Wouldnāt you just dive head down to try and inflict maximum damage on the head if youāre trying to die? (1/4)š§µ
@AndrewKolvet You just make yourself and TPUSA look guilty. You are pathetic and absolutely terrible at PR. Keep it up. Even those who loved the fed slop are starting to ask the right questions now.
I grow infinitely tired of the first sentence here. I don't know what goes on with the Candace situation, I don't watch podcasts. With that in mind, let me offer you all some sense.
In America, you are innocent until proven guilty. End of story. Anyone making the statement this idiot just made needs to reflect. And yes, it's idiotic, so spare me the self righteous virtue signaling. You do not condemn someone to guilt before seeing the evidence and going through a thorough process to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This is a human right. So, Kristan, I know you find logic and consequence challenging, evidenced by your failure as a pro life advocate, but bear with me here.
When a high profile political and religious figure, of which Charlie was both, is assassinated, no stone can be left unturned. Everyone close to him, every business relationship, every random quack letter with a threat, EVERYTHING must be investigated.
When this much money, power, and influence are involved, those closest must be met with ultimate scrutiny. Not as accusation, but as thorough investigation.
I find it ridiculous that such common sense must be stated.
As far as the ever obvious clown show arguments, let's put something to bed.
I don't trust our government. I don't trust any other government. When the most influential evangelical Christian on the planet is bankrolled by Jewish influence, which is a completely opposed theology, openly states that Israel is ethnically cleansing GAZA, as in, openly makes accusations of genocide, against the opposing religious influence that bankrolls his existence, one must factor this in. When donors, funding operatives, and world leaders are in the DMs, one must take that into account.
I am not saying Israel killed Charlie. I literally have no idea. I am saying how on earth can you rule any involvement out? Even secondary involvement. You think this is so irrelevant that it doesn't merit investigation? You think screeching "conspiracy" makes you sound rational or well intentioned? It doesn't. It makes you sound like a tone deaf sycophant with no desire for truth. And oppressive, thought policing tyrant.
I also believe that Erika Kirk has acted EXTRAORDINARILY strange in the wake of Charlie's death. Does that mean she killed him? No. Does that even mean something is off? No. People act weird all the time. What it does mean, is taking videos of Charlie in a casket and posting to social media is odd. The interviews are odd, the mannerisms are odd. The behavior is all odd, and there are odd things in the history. And that should ALL be taken into consideration. Again, on what planet is having eyes and ears and opinions on behavior some sort of thought crime?
Again, I haven't even spoken about this topic, and I have no clue who killed Kirk, and indeed I hold no position on it, but I find the shaping of narratives and the silencing of dissent, and the "mis and disinformation" campaigns akin to... COVID? Are you people are completely lost?
Given that this is the biggest political assassination since Kennedy, maybe people should stop being retards and look at the whole picture.
Is it possible some random transgender freak pulled off the greatest hit of our lifetimes? Sure. Is it likely, given the circumstances? Not at all. Trust your government at your own peril.
If you are incapable of having conversations on this topic, maybe sit at the children's table this Thanksgiving.
In closing, you will likely never know who killed Kirk. But someone will fall.
If you want to prove to someone that Charlie's shirt moves BEFORE the damage to his neck, show them this. It is unbelievable that anyone believes it was a bullet. At this point, I think some people just say they believe the FEDSLOP because their hatred of Candace Owens outweighs their love of the truth.
This is a previously unseen and unpublished picture of Charlie Kirk being carried to the SUV. Notice the marks under his right nipple. Notice, perhaps more importantly, the absence of marks in a rectangle formation.
TPUSA insiders still have time to come forward, but itās running out.
This day isnāt going to end well for you. I promise.
Funny how the only people who think Tyler did it are all on TPUSAās payroll or part of the TPUSA social circuit. Charlieās security lead him to the slaughter house. Did you learn nothing from Butler? Even if you legitimately believed Tyler got him from the roof (I donāt) youāre saying that his security knowingly left the roof unchecked after that same āmistakeā almost cost Trump his life the year earlier? Wow.
Secondly, even Andrew was concerned the pro-Israel lobby could have been responsible for taking Charlie out because he sent the group texts to Joe Kent in the first place. And Joe, who I interviewed yesterday, said once again he was blocked by the FBI from running down foreign leads pertaining to Charlieās assassination.
You also have a first hand witness who was one of the guys that paved over Charlieās crime scene saying the Governor and
FBI ordered it be done asap. Then the vehicle gets disposed of? And on top of that you have George Zinn just randomly showing up at UVU admitting to a murder he didnāt do. This entire lone shooter narrative is BS whether you admit it or not.
And prior to Charlieās death, he was being bullied by the pro-Israel lobby. The group texts prove it, his interviews prove it, and I saw first hand the Israeli influence beginning to show up inside TPUSA having been a part of the influencer program and media row for over 5 years.
A foreign county has no business involving itself with an American political organization with a literal ballot chasing arm. What is TPUSA the new AIPAC? Despite Charlie saying Massie was his favorite congressman you guys left him hanging. I canāt and wonāt stay silent anymore. Charlie deserves justice.
@LauraLoomer@RealCandaceO I can see why you were committed to a mental institution, twice right? We are witnessing another breakdown tonight. This is pathetic. You are so obsessed.
@Geopotato23@LauraLoomer What does the color of her ass have to do with anything. The more I read comments from you deranged Loomer people the more max I want Candace to go.