A bulletproof vest could not have saved Charlie Kirk; he was shot in the neck.
The security he had did not save or protect him.
If he had a gun, it wouldn’t have mattered either, because the shot was reportedly from a sniper 200 yards away.
The only thing that could’ve helped Charlie Kirk was more gun regulation, an idea that he and his peers are vehemently against.
Posts like this prove you are either not informed enough to be posting about the person. Or you know exactly what kinda person they were and thought it was no problem with it. Both counts make you a bozo
I think what liberals mean when they say the genocide will get 'worse' under Trump is that the second he enters office they'll suddenly realize it's wrong to murder tens of thousands of innocent people. It'll suddenly become wrong for *them*, which is 'worse'.
This frat's chapter at my school is currently dealing with a scandal involving mass distribution of date rape drugs and a hazing ritual they've nicknamed "race war"
Comments on this from zionazis are revealing cause they’re trying to justify it because of Oct 7 but in fact the photo is from 2006 and these Hitler Youth are signing bombs to be dropped on Lebanon in Israel’s murderous invasion. They don’t need an excuse to be depraved.