Anna Estrella

[Anna Estrella @itwist1]

When Narcolepsy meets Tourettes https://t.co/M7pg7ZorrP via @YouTube

[Anna Estrella @itwist1]

Sorry, Alabama.

[Anna Estrella @itwist1]

Unbelievable!

[Camus @newstart_2024]

This MRI study on young kids just exposed something terrifying:

They scanned the brains of 60 children aged 3–5 — including 5-year-old Rose — and found interactive screen time is causing measurable loss of white matter in their developing brains. Even just 2 hours a day is linked to impaired neural connectivity, language, and literacy development.

Professor Mike Nagel (neuroscientist and father) said his first reaction was simply: “Wow… I was not anticipating seeing anything like that.”

We’re physically changing children’s brains before they even start school — and the damage is visible on scans.

This one actually unsettled me. I’ve always suspected too much screen time was bad, but seeing real white matter loss in toddlers hits different.

Parents of little ones — has this kind of research changed how much screen time you allow?

[Anna Estrella @itwist1]

@lady_valor_07 Is it a plumb bob?

[Anna Estrella @itwist1]

f those in power see warning signs and choose not to act, that decision affects every American.
Doing nothing is still a choice

https://t.co/rMfi2YtGDM

[Anna Estrella @itwist1]

@IloveTrumpMK Integrity

[Anna Estrella @itwist1]

@MrDavX I wasn’t trying to target anyone personally. I was expressing the frustration and sadness I feel when I see people struggling, and it feels like leadership doesn’t have their back. I care about all of us, and I shared my feelings because I believe we deserve better support.

[Anna Estrella @itwist1]

Yes. It provides me with endless frustration, people voting against their best interests. Scrolling thru, viewing profile pics, commenters are definitely not “Top 1%.” Ordinary people who deserve happiness. It’s sad. Trump doesn’t care about them. I do. And I worry for all people.

[Anna Estrella @itwist1]

The constitution provides mechanisms to address this. They exist for a reason.
Not for politics.
For protection.

https://t.co/dX8SKWGgKk

[Anna Estrella @itwist1]

@honeymoon250 It’s a peddle bike bell. Drdrdrdring, drdrdrdring!

[Anna Estrella @itwist1]

@MrDavX He can’t. Michelle can. 😉

[Anna Estrella @itwist1]

@VolodyaTretyak Sycophant.

[Anna Estrella @itwist1]

Ozzy Osbourne on Trump: “He can start World War 3” #ozzyosbourne #trump ... https://t.co/PAGapkuwap via @YouTube

[Anna Estrella @itwist1]

@PopSlotsCasino C

[Anna Estrella @itwist1]

@herotimeszero Class.

[Anna Estrella @itwist1]

@Matt_Pinner It’s a foot peddle from a peddle bike.

[Anna Estrella @itwist1]

There's a reason the Constitution includes mechanisms for evaluating whether a president can do the job. Those mechanisms exist because the Founders knew that sometimes, hard questions need to be asked.

I started a petition calling on Congress to conduct a real, bipartisan evaluation of concerns about presidential fitness for office. This isn't about predetermined outcomes or partisan attacks—it's about accountability and transparency. If credible concerns exist, they deserve to be examined through proper legal processes, not swept aside.

Right now, Congress has the power to act on this. They can choose to investigate thoroughly, present evidence to the public, and let the process work. Or they can ignore their constitutional responsibility and hope nobody notices. That choice matters.

Do you think Congress should investigate when serious fitness questions arise, or are we just supposed to hope everything turns out okay? If this matters to you too—if you believe in accountability and the rule of law—consider signing and sharing the petition. This is bigger than politics. It's about whether our government actually works the way it's supposed to.

https://t.co/kY0FoCRWX6

[Anna Estrella @itwist1]

@KingTunde_SZN 67