tivania ✞ ✨🍉

replacement accounts

anti-Zionist Christians
Humanity First 🕊️
🇱🇧🇵🇸🇮🇷

[tivania ✞ ✨🍉 @itxkucell]

@YisraelOfficial Only stupid Christians stand with Israel👎
A Christian✝️☦️ reveals what it's like to be a Christian in #Israel.

Cursed,

spitted on

and attacked, every day.

“Jesus is a ****, Jesus is a son of a bitch”

They're expelling Christianity from the holy land.

#israelicrimes

[Weather Monitor @WeatherMonitors]

A rare natural phenomenon caused by ocean conditions: pink sea cucumbers washed ashore in Thailand’s Rayong province, turning parts of the beach reddish-pink; an investigation is underway.

[GBX @GBX_Press]

🚨 Poll

Do you believe the United States is losing its influence in the Middle East?

🟢 Yes
🔴 No

[Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹 @angeloinchina]

Further info on Indonesia >

[tivania ✞ ✨🍉 @itxkucell]

@Parodyjeffx OMG

this is absolutely horrible

Epstein Israel
Epstein Israel
Epstein Israel

[Parody Jeff @Parodyjeffx]

HOLY SHIT: They are building a second Epstein Island 😂

[Parody Jeff @Parodyjeffx]

Candace Owens went on Russian TV and eviscerated Israel live, as it deserved.

She exposed the sick hypocrisy over Gaza versus Ukraine when it comes to civilians.

She also exposed how Jewish lobbies control conservative and Christian in America.

[Parody Jeff @Parodyjeffx]

HOLY CRAP 🚨

Day 6. Albania’s streets are exploding like never before.

Over 400.000 Albanians rage against Jared Kushner’s $5 billion land grab.

They refuse to hand their coast to the Jews.

[Parody Jeff @Parodyjeffx]

HOLY CRAP 🚨

Hidden camera in London catches senior rabbi telling abuse victims to stay silent and never call the police.

RABBIS RAPED a girl inside his Stamford Hill synagogue.

Parents knew and stayed quiet, terrified of community shunning.

[GBX @GBX_Press]

Do you think the rise of the far right threatens the future of the European Union?
🟢 Yes
🔴 No

[tivania ✞ ✨🍉 @itxkucell]

@rajamohammad07 @BBCWorld remember BBC Jewish media

[tivania ✞ ✨🍉 @itxkucell]

@BBCWorld F*ck Baby Killer 🇮🇱

[Bule Mewek @BuleMewek]

@_xvivinmidd @angeloinchina @OpenSociety Good insight
We'll keep an eye on them.

[Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹 @angeloinchina]

The Energy War and the Containment of China: Can the Empire Succeed?

Credit Billy Bob.

We begin with a premise that should no longer be controversial: the United States is deliberately engineering a global energy monopoly. Through the blockade of Iran, the destruction of Nord Stream, the sanctions regime against Russia, the procurement of vast energy resources in Libya and the Mediterranean, the brazen piracy against rival shipping, the theft of Venezuelan oil, and the military domination of key shipping chokepoints, Washington is systematically destroying the export capacity of rivals and bringing global energy supply under its direct or indirect control. The objective is not merely profit for US energy corporations, though record profits are a welcome byproduct. The objective is hegemony. Control over price, access, and transit routes is to be weaponized to discipline rivals and, above all, to isolate and contain the People’s Republic of China.

If we accept this as true—and the evidence leaves little room for doubt—the critical question becomes: Can this strategy succeed? On this, there are broadly two camps.

The First View: Catastrophic Failure

The first perspective holds that the plan is already in ruins. The US has blundered into a series of no-win confrontations, depleting its munitions in peripheral theaters while China rises untouched. Iranian and Russian forces have not collapsed as anticipated; the "pivot to Asia" remains a logistical fantasy. Trump’s particular brand of ignorance, combined with the duplicity of his regional allies, has supposedly caught the empire in a trap that wiser predecessors avoided. From this vantage point, the US is flailing, alienating the Global South, and only accelerating the world’s turn toward Chinese green energy and multipolar institutions. The plan, they conclude, has failed upon first contact with reality.

There is much to commend this view, and it satisfies a certain revolutionary optimism. But it risks underestimating the enemy.

The Second View: The Plan Is Advancing

A more sober assessment gives the Western planners their due. The transnational capitalist class is not stupid. It understands that wars are messy, that contradictions abound, and that tactical setbacks are the price of strategic repositioning. The macro picture is what matters. And on the macro level, Europe and Asia are more dependent on US-controlled energy than they were five years ago. US energy companies have captured market share that was previously held by Russia and Iran. The transatlantic alliance, however frayed, has been reforged around a common anti-China purpose.

The plan, from this perspective, is not about immediate victory but about the patient assembly of a coercive apparatus. The energy monopoly is the lever; the decoupling from Chinese supply chains is the goal. Whether this lever will ultimately be sufficient to force nations to choose between Washington and Beijing is an open question. But the lever is real, and it is growing heavier.

The Crux: Can Energy Monopoly Isolate China?

This is where dialectics becomes essential. Those who dismiss the plan outright as impossible fail to account for the nature of class power on a global scale.

The transnational capitalist class—the oligarchy headquartered in the United States but with tentacles in every major economy—is united by a single, overriding class interest: the containment of China and the prevention of a transition beyond the predatory stage of monopoly capitalism. Since 1945, and with renewed urgency since 1991, this class has demonstrated a willingness to sacrifice whatever is necessary—including entire national economies, democratic forms, and human lives on a mass scale—to preserve its hegemony.

The question, then, is not whether the oligarchy desires to use its energy weapon to coerce the rest of the planet. It does, and it will. The question is whether the target nations can be forced into compliance.

[Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹 @angeloinchina]

China is the number one trading partner of over 140 countries. For the vast majority of the Global South, rational national interest points unambiguously toward Chinese-manufactured green energy, Belt and Road infrastructure, and a break from Western fossil-fuel dependency. But rational national interest does not automatically translate into state policy. The West has spent decades perfecting the art of imposing comprador governments that subordinate the interests of their own people to the dictates of foreign capital. This is the entire history of the post-1945 US empire.

The success or failure of the containment strategy will therefore be determined by the class struggle within each pivotal state. The West does not need to win every country. It only needs to lock in a few strategic partners that can make an economic blockade or a proxy war viable. The list is obvious: Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Taiwan, and if possible, India, Indonesia, Pakistan. If the comprador fractions of these nations' ruling classes can be installed or reinforced, they will enact policies directly contrary to their own national development—policies that serve the hegemonic interests of the Western oligarchy at the expense of their own populations.

This is not speculation. It is the precise mechanism by which the US has maintained its empire for eighty years.

Why It Ultimately Will Not Work

The reason this strategy, however rational from the oligarchy's perspective, will ultimately fail is contained in its own contradictions.

First, the energy weapon is a diminishing asset. China is not sitting still. It is the global leader in renewable energy, battery technology, and grid infrastructure. Every year, the cost of green energy falls, and the viability of independence from fossil fuels increases. The window for energy coercion is closing.

Second, the comprador strategy is inherently unstable. The populations of the Global South are not passive. The more blatantly their governments act against the national interest, the more they invite internal revolt. The wave of anti-imperialist sentiment across Africa, Latin America, and Asia is not a passing mood; it is the material response to a dying system's predation.

Third, the transnational oligarchy itself is riddled with contradictions. The drive for short-term profit conflicts with the long-term strategic requirements of hegemony. The "sacrifice" of whole economies may be acceptable in the abstract, but when it threatens the balance sheets of the very corporations the oligarchy represents, internal fractures multiply. The US energy industry's windfall profits may clash with the interests of Wall Street if a global depression dries up demand. The unity of the capitalist class is always provisional and always breaks down under pressure.

Finally, the oligarchy's willingness to entertain global depression, world war, or even nuclear escalation is not a sign of strength. It is the desperate lashing out of a class that has already lost the long game. China has won the twenty-first century in the realm of production and development. The US can only try to destroy what it can no longer dominate. That is the logic of barbarism, and it is the logic of a class preparing its own grave.

Conclusion

The Western oligarchy is actively pursuing an energy monopoly to isolate China, and we should not underestimate the near-term damage it can inflict. The comprador states of Asia are the battlefield. The plan could, in a limited tactical sense, advance further than many believe. But it cannot ultimately succeed, because the productive forces have already escaped the empire's grip, and the global class struggle is shifting decisively against the old order. The energy war is not a strategy for victory. It is a strategy for a rearguard action that will fail, as all such actions fail, under the weight of its own contradictions.

[Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹 @angeloinchina]

Indonesia > in color revolution strategies, martyrs—protesters killed by security forces—act as pivotal symbols. Their deaths are amplified into narratives of state brutality, unifying opposition, evoking widespread sympathy, eroding regime legitimacy, and attracting media plus external support. This turns localized grievances into sustained mobilization, a pattern seen across various protest movements.

Medias like BBC are just globalist/pro US media in charge of amplification.

[Angelo Giuliano 🇨🇭🇮🇹 @angeloinchina]

US will gradually focus more on China and South China Sea in its strategy of containment/blockade of China.
Some self proclaimed china experts claiming the opposite are just too NAIVE.

There is a concerted effort by US allies in the region with Japan, South Korea, Philippines, Australia and even trying to get Indonesia on board.

Be informed, not entertained.

Video below by excellent Liu Xin.

[Earth Hippy 🌎🕊️💚 @hippyygoat]

Thats respect👏🏼

[tivania ✞ ✨🍉 @itxkucell]

@jong_slow my pleasure Fren 🙏🏻

[Parody Jeff @Parodyjeffx]

How many generations of incest took place for this creature to exist ?

[GBX @GBX_Press]

Do you support a unified Arab military alliance independent of Western influence?
A. Yes
B. No