@Bravo6Intel@RavenSoftware@InfinityWard@CallofDuty@CallofDutyCM Maybe having so many weapons in Warzone 2020 was excessive, especially since it caused errors. But if developers see it as viable in current Warzone, what’s the problem? I’ve never seen weapon-related errors in current Warzone. You’re not forced to use them, so why complain?
@Gpforce188 Lo curioso es que en Xbox también cuestan 40 € en digital. 😂 Si el precio te parece un robo, mejor una Xbox 360 o una PS3 con el juego físico por menos de 10 €, o una PC si quieres jugarlos gratis. Opciones hay.
@360NoScope That's cool, but a lot of people enjoyed BO2 on PS3, and the best part was that online multiplayer was free—something PlayStation only changed after Xbox made paid online the norm.
@itssp1rit No los pagues, nadie te está obligando. Que un juego tenga años no significa que deba valer $10. La mayoría de los Call of Duty clásicos siguen costando más de $40, excepto cuando entran en oferta
@CODWarfareForum I don't think it's favoritism. BO1 and BO2 never had native PS4/PS5 versions, so ports make sense there. On Xbox they're already playable via backward compatibility. The hacking issue is real, but Activision likely doesn't see a new port as worth the investment for them right now
@imTheRealMetal But in CODM, the best content has always been obtained through that lucky draw system, so it’s nothing new. That idea mainly comes from Tencent; they handle the monetization while Activision focuses on the content. People got so used to paying that they never changed the system.