@Techoteco1 Yep, same. Makes sense that it's not free all-in-all but the way it was pitched sounded like "here's a little extra-free on top of the shit-show of a remaster we did. Like v 3.0 came with some extra gameplay.
@Levonaxper It took a few reads to get what you meant about not touching another console (just finished work 😴) so I thought it might help your argument to have more of the numbers to hand. How many people got a PS3 after the 130mil PS2's (I went XB360 cos cheaper) and was the mis-step PS4?
@PUREFILTH6669 @_LarZen_ @pcgamer Ignore the stylising/butchering of existing art for a moment and think about if this tech could create photorealistic versions and that tech is put in the creatives hands, that's what they're working towards.
@_LarZen_ @PUREFILTH6669@pcgamer As long as it's trained on the right data, the original artist's data for example, it could be great. For now though, it suffers the same fate as most AI gen content. They really could have done a better demo.
@Bionstic @_LarZen_ @pcgamer If it wasn't AI, you wouldn't have an issue with it. Separate that feeling (however justified) from the fact that it does look better. Not perfect, and some things look even worse but the potential for greatness is there.
What they shouldn't have done, is butcher existing art!