JacquieJ

[JacquieJ @jackratatatat]

@It5ervice5 @factpostnews ROFL

[JacquieJ @jackratatatat]

@factpostnews This man is my hero of the week. He's ready for primetime standup.

[FactPost @factpostnews]

Fox: Why are you here this morning?

Trump rally attendee: Well, in the late 70s, I was a little too young to go to South America for the Jonestown Massacre. But this is as close as I'll ever get, so that's why I'm here. There's nothing like seeing a cult right up front.

[JacquieJ @jackratatatat]

@PBOnPoint @leahfiles Did you ask her abut her connections to Elizabeth Lane?

[JacquieJ @jackratatatat]

@AtomicPrototype @HezDrake @leahfiles @_whitneywebb She does put a compelling narrative to the facts she gathers but there is no debate among these creators on what the facts could mean. I sure you can rearrage the facts in several ways to get different conclusions.

[JacquieJ @jackratatatat]

I didnt vote for Trump but i can understand why some thinking people voted for him because they were trying to break the status quo. If anything I was a coward or a fool hoping the status quo could be broken with a "sensible" person in office. But when Kamala came out in defense of Israel I knew it was going to be the same old same old. Trump might have even started out with every intention to do the right thing. I am believe Candance did too.

[JacquieJ @jackratatatat]

@AtomicPrototype @leahfiles @jimmy_dore Are any of these survellience companies doing something to the petrodollar?

[JacquieJ @jackratatatat]

@PBOnPoint Could you please explain Leahs connection to Elizabeth Lane. I dont agree with how Candance is reacting in this situation but i'm also worried that Leah is connected to Elizabeth Lane.

[JacquieJ @jackratatatat]

I had only heard of Candace as a sellout to the black community. I believed the media for years. I took a chance and watched her reporting on Macron and have watched her content ever since. After listening to her talk i realize how the media had twisted her statements that actually made intelligent points that were difficult for the public to hear but were factual.

I having listened to her for a year. I agreed with her perspective that when someone attacks a person but never answers the question you are right to suspect their motives. Now I see her displaying the same behavior I thought we both identified as shady. I jumped on X to see if I was getting this all wrong.

Maybe you are seeing other people like me, who are normally YouTube watchers, who dont live on X, who are trying to get the latest informaton and you think we are bots. My theory is she no longer needs the thinking base. Maybe, she has reached a critical mass of followers who wont question her behavior, and doesnt need the ones who can see the hypocrisy in this situation. It worked for Trump for a decade.

[JacquieJ @jackratatatat]

@cdavylived @PBOnPoint @leahfiles Leah is highlighting conflicts of interest. If you trust that money isnt influencing someone's actions or words then there is nothing to see here.

[JacquieJ @jackratatatat]

@sachmo8 @leahfiles @RealCandaceO a rhetorical tactic and logical fallacy where someone attacks the character, motive, or personal trait of the person making an argument instead of addressing the substance of the argument itself. Do you agree with this definition?

[JacquieJ @jackratatatat]

@ohhimeg @RealCandaceO @RealGraceBella @leahfiles Can someone translate Candance's response for me? I am not fluent in word saladese.

[JacquieJ @jackratatatat]

@cdavylived @PBOnPoint @leahfiles yes its all publicly available but I dont see anyone else aggregating the information like Leah.

[JacquieJ @jackratatatat]

@GalacticosFam @AshNoseTruth @leahfiles @ShawnRyan762 @RealCandaceO @baroncoleman I hear ya. Her information is not easy to digest. If you cant understand the information all you can do is go with your gut.

[JacquieJ @jackratatatat]

I agree with her investigative style. It takes a village to hold the government accountable. But when those same connection start adding up for her own choices and behavior, I am expecting her to behave the way she askes her targets to behave. Transparency and answers that make logical sense.

[JacquieJ @jackratatatat]

We cant force anything. We can hope Candance can see that crashing out instead of answering questions is what she trained us to watch out for. I dont know if there is an updated response but the last one i saw in those text messages was complete word salad. Every thing she has criticised her opponents over she is doing right now. Which is fine. We are all human but she is not willing to correct herself.

[JacquieJ @jackratatatat]

We arent stupid. She said she believed in truth. She trained us to look how someone responds to questions. I'm dissappointed but I she is human. I cant imagine how hard it would be to go up against these kind of powerful people. I do believe she was giving us very damaging information but then maybe the economic pressure was just too much.

[JacquieJ @jackratatatat]

yes i agree with you. She needs to pin down what she calls herself for an audience that might not grasps the subject. But I don't need letters behind a name if the information is easily digested. If I can look at the information and judge for myself I dont need your credentials. If you are trying to show me something extremely difficult like theoretical physics a masters in math is not going to cut it for me. But if its just aggregating sec filings Im not worried about degrees.

[JacquieJ @jackratatatat]

Leah is not trying to discuss global macro economics. She was trying to explain to you SEC filings. Grok tried to explain to you there are different specialists under the wide umbrella of economics and told you the petro dollar is not fundamental to economics the way subtraction is to physics.