Jack Tinney

Bach Maximalist

[Jack Tinney @jackrtinney]

https://t.co/5I9LPv4Wu7

[Nicolas Dorier @NicolasDorier]

@OmarchyLinux is a monumental milestone in OS history. It is a source of inspiration for every OS, everybody will follow.

After tasting the freedom of a malleable OS where agents allows you to customize anything... You just can't go back. I would preach it to my grandma.

[Jack Tinney @jackrtinney]

@doncoffee26 @DavidDeutschOxf "Hoarding" cash under a mattress increases the value of cash and makes everyone richer.

[David Deutsch @DavidDeutschOxf]

I just fixed my dishwasher with the help of ChatGPT. A trivial task. I had been about to order a new one. So this software has increased the country's real wealth yet decreased the measured GDP. The main economic indicator is structurally incapable of registering the thing that actually makes people better off, namely the growth of knowledge

[Brett Hall @ToKTeacher]

Jaron Lanier on how to think about LLMs (and stuff like it doing mathematics).

As a bonus, he connects current doom-talk around AI directly to the loss of optimism in popular Sci-Fi. Memes beginning in Sci-Fi fundamentally affect talk in intellectual/tech communities:

[Jack Tinney @jackrtinney]

@dhh It's called bitcoin. :)

[Jack Tinney @jackrtinney]

@BitcoinPierre *40.1 trillion

[Jack Tinney @jackrtinney]

@1dad2lads @Chaos2Cured @theknowlegenews @Reuters It didn't exist back then but it does now and its a fundamental part of every job and daily life. Banning it is completely backwards. It should be celebrated for the miraculous tech it is.

[Jack Tinney @jackrtinney]

@lunolaser @saylor 😂

[Samson Mow @Excellion]

Special thanks to @jackrtinney and @KatyWuu for getting the report across the finish line, and to everyone that’s supported @JAN3com on our mission! 🔥❤️

[Jack Tinney @jackrtinney]

https://t.co/QJ2Li1QUwP

[Jack Tinney @jackrtinney]

@jaggie @ScottAWolfe @JimChuong no?

[Jack Tinney @jackrtinney]

@NEEDcreations @GonanEdogawa @BrianSchmidt9 @AquaBitcoin @Excellion @JAN3com Tap here

[Jack Tinney @jackrtinney]

@jaggie @ScottAWolfe @JimChuong Certainly!

The Byzantine Generals Problem comes from a 1982 computer science paper:

“The Byzantine Generals Problem” by Leslie Lamport, Robert Shostak, and Marshall Pease.

[Balaji @balajis]

My view is: you’re not actually mad at me, but mad at the situation. I grant that it sucks, but I didn’t cause decades of money printing and the pending sovereign debt crisis, and neither did you.

But in short: if the Mayflower was American, and leaving England to build New England was American, then leaving the dysfunctional old world to build the new is the most American thing you can do.

A longer response follows.

(1) DID THE IRISH AMERICANS BETRAY IRELAND?
First, did the Irish Americans betray Ireland by leaving for America? Why weren’t they loyal to Ireland? Why did they "cut and run"? Why didn’t they stay and fight the Irish Potato Famine?

And the Puritans...did they traduce England by not returning and fighting with the Roundheads? Were the Virginians disloyal to the other side, the Cavaliers? How about the German Americans…how come they left Europe after the Revolutions of 1848?

Point: virtually every single US ethnic group, other than the African Americans and Native Americans, “fled” some issue in the old world. War, civil war, communism, fascism, fundamentalism. The whole point of the New World was to leave behind dysfunctional, bankrupt states…often caught in the throes of endless left-vs-right conflicts.

If almost every single American is descended from someone who left a dysfunctional state, how can it be un-American to leave a dysfunctional state? Why could your ancestors leave dysfunction, why are they free men... but others can’t move, and are locked to the land?

(2) LOYAL TO BLUE OR RED AMERICANS?
Second, if someone tries being loyal to “the American people”, does that mean being loyal to the 75 million Kamala voters, the Blue Americans? Because if you’re loyal to them, you are unfortunately no longer loyal to the Red Americans.

And that’s the rub. Just as Democrats use “democracy” to mean rule by Democrats, and are then stunned that ~50% of democratic votes keep going to Republicans, Republicans keep using “American” to mean Red American, and are then always angry that ~50% of US citizens are Blue Americans.

Today, Gallup reports only 36% of Democrats are “proud to be American”. They are, however, proud to be Democrats. They’re also not posting on X, but rather on Bluesky. The digital secession, the spiritual secession of Democrats away from a “United” States of America has already happened. That’s unfortunately what polarization means.

This Blue/Red conflict is exactly the kind of left-right fight that the Puritans and Cavaliers left behind in the 1600s, and the German Americans left in the 1800s. Just like there is no Korea, only North Korea and South Korea, there is unfortunately no America any more, only Blue America and Red America. And just like the Korean situation led to a Korean diaspora, the American situation is causing an American diaspora.

(3) STAY AND FIGHT, BUT WHO OR WHAT?
Then, if someone was to stay and fight, who do you want them to fight? Perhaps you want them to fight other Americans (namely Blue Americans), in the name of being an American. Or you want them "fight" a ~$175T sovereign debt crisis, which is like fighting a volcanoa, as it's just the largest bill ever due in history, and something even Elon couldn’t put a dent in.

TLDR: you can’t “stay and fight” a sovereign debt crisis. It’s not something you can punch in the nose.

(4) SHOULD INDIAN AMERICANS STAY OR GO?
Also, in case you haven't noticed, half of MAGA is yelling that Indian tech guys should leave the country, or never come, as they'll never be true Americans. Now others are suddenly mad that Indian tech guys are taking them up on it, and leaving America. Meanwhile, far leftists have begun just shooting at tech guys.

This is just a schizo and unstable situation.

(5) LOYALTY TO IDEALS WAS LOYALTY TO AMERICA
I am loyal to capitalism, democracy, free speech, free markets, science, math, wherever they are. I am loyal to peace and trade, small-l libertarianism, privacy, nonviolence, and technological innovation.

I am also loyal to a specific enumerated group of people, the many friends, coworkers, collaborators, and customers who I’ve worked with over the years, both US citizens and non-citizens, from the Stanford and Silicon Valley of a few decades ago.

These were essentially the mainstream American ideals for decades. Millions of Americans still support them. Indeed, millions of Americans think that blood-and-soil nationalism of the kind you implicitly propound is un-American!

(6) BLOOD AND SOIL, BUT WHAT BLOOD?
Finally, and now we really get down to brass tacks: what test do you propose to determine whether someone is a true American, aside from their current paperwork? Because unlike (say) the Japanese, there is no genetic test that correlates close-to-perfectly with US passport ownership.

Therefore, any definition of who’s American *has* to be civic nationalism from a purely operational standpoint, defined at the “software” level (in terms of law) rather than the hardware level (in terms of genetics).

Yet if you try to get N different rightists to define the “is_american” function you’ll get N different definitions, with and without different minority groups. One that went viral recently is the “Grade A American = Mayflower” thing, which is sort of like wokeness in reverse, but for MAGA.

And look: loyalty means symmetry. I am loyal to you if you are loyal to me. But the way you're talking about loyalty translates to servitude. I've been polite, and engaged you in good faith, but we are strangers. Yet you are demanding gratitude and even deference (!) from me, implicitly on racial grounds, because "you didn't build that, someone else made that happen". Moreover, you are doing so by invoking "the people" in a right-coded variation of the way the Soviets invoked "the people."

I'm sorry, that doesn't fly.

Why would anyone be loyal to a MAGA faction that arbitrarily designates countless millions to be Grade B, C, and D? You can't just redefine the social contract overnight, unilaterally, with some tweets, into a retconned blood-and-soil America that the WASPs themselves shut down...and then get extremely mad when others don't buy into it.

We're just going have to renegotiate these kinds of relationships from scratch, with new opt-in communities, where everyone is a grade A citizen. If that means rebuilding New America outside America, just as New England was built outside England, so be it. The next Mayflower is boarding.

[Jack Tinney @jackrtinney]

@SeanAllenFenn @DavidDeutschOxf @reach256k But the vast majority of public keys which control funds are hashed.

[Jack Tinney @jackrtinney]

@DavidDeutschOxf @reach256k Literally true in a parochial way. The security of *the current, most recent versions of the currently most widely distributed clients* depend on a lack of progress in pure math.

[Jack Tinney @jackrtinney]

@TheBlueMatt slippery slope

[calle @callebtc]

USDC on base seems far more common for 402 payments now than Bitcoin. Recently, even Stripe joined the bandwagon. That’s a centralized stablecoin on a permissioned chain. Agents are starting to use fiat. It’s a huge loss, and in a race, many aren’t even aware that it exists.

The scam coins are marching on, and even fiat is evolving.

Where are the Bitcoin solutions that attract real users? Which other concept other than buying and selling Bitcoin has actually broken out of the bubble and made it to the mainstream?

Bitcoin doesn’t just happen. These missing solutions need to be built by someone. Reject the “Bitcoin wins by hodling” narrative. The devs and entrepreneurs are what keep this project alive and keep marching forward.

It’s not the scammy influencers, not the psychotic drama queens, the child-like infighting, or incompetent idiots dancing on the graves of word-class devs leaving Bitcoin.

I hope the bear market flushes all that crap away, and we can get back to building stuff instead of tearing it down.

[Jack Tinney @jackrtinney]

@MaltstotheMax @srqbanker @RapidResponse47 You think he'll get 25 years? They're trying for death penalty lol

[Jack Tinney @jackrtinney]

@MaltstotheMax @srqbanker @RapidResponse47 It's not excusal from consequences though, that's the difference.