“police arrest man who is bleeding to death because the stabber claimed he was racist”
its literally impossible to satirize the UK anymore. even the most extreme, hamfisted memes are just real things that actually happen now
Imagine having the stress and responsibility of running an organisation that employs 400,000 people and some loser with a free flat and taxpayer funded car says you should be happy to do it for £100k a year so they have more money to spend on deliveroo
@jeremycorbyn Jeremy - literally yesterday an Afghan illegal was jailed for abducting and raping a 12-year-old girl. He is not the first, he will not be the last.
So I don't give a shit about a 'kinder world'.
I want a safe Britain.
"The first sip from the glass of natural sciences will make you an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you."
— Werner Heisenberg, Father of Quantum Physics
Even the BBC is now openly questioning Net Zero. 10 years from now, you won't be able to find a single person who will admit they supported this lunacy.
MakeEnergyCheapAgain.
@LSEOxfordEcon@Grumpletastic@FraserNelson@slimmatt1 Excuse me sir but that bar sits slightly over 100 on the “number of offences” axis. There is a line across from the 100 which aids your ability to interpret this. There’s no need for language like that and trying to insult someone’s intelligence whilst being wrong yourself
"Digital ID is just for over 18s. To prove they have a right to work. To combat illegal migration. That's all."
"Oh and every child in the country needs one too"
Logical conclusion:
They are lying to you.
It's not for what they say it's for.
RESIST.
Digital ID has nothing to do with immigration, just think critically for 3 seconds.
Britain currently has up to 1 million illegal immigrants. Many, if not most, are known to the authorities. And yet they're still here. The reason they're here is NOT that we can't identify them (the problem Digital ID is supposed to solve), the problem is that we won't deport them even when we know who they are.
This is not about immigration, it's about building CONTROL INFRASTRUCTURE. It's why Blair tried and failed to push them through 20 years ago.
Imagine that governments which routinely arrest people for jokes and memes, locked people in their homes during COVID and think half the country is "far right" have these tools at its disposal.
And, some of you are convinced half the country really is "far right" and are about to elect that evil fascist Herr Farage. You want him to have this control infrastructure at his disposal?
This needs to be opposed by everyone across the political spectrum. It has nothing to do with what you're being told: Starmer is lying to you and so are his media lackeys.
I drive LEGALLY so I have a driving licence.
I travel LEGALLY so I have a passport.
I live LEGALLY so I’m on the electoral roll.
I own a business LEGALLY so I’m registered at Companies House.
I am regularly credit checked LEGALLY and pass because I pay my utility bills and Council Tax, both of which are extortionate due to government policies on renewable energy (climate scam) and soaking the “so called” middle class, destroying aspiration.
Those who live in this country ILLEGALLY often have as little as precisely none of these things.
Digital ID, the Brit Card or similar is NOTHING to do with identifying people like me apart from extending the surveillance state into a Communist Social Credit system.
If you really BELIEVE that Digital ID will help tackle illegal immigration, I have a Boriswave to sell you.
Resist. Resist. Resist.
Keir Starmer’s advisers have stitched him up again, he’s walked straight into it.
A MILLION signatures in just a few hours !
Massive mistake by Labour, as since Covid, people have woke up to Government overreach and control.
Dear @PamBondi, I would respectfully disagree with your position. Free speech is a deontological principle. Short of defamation, a direct incitement to violence, etc, the "hate speech" position bathes in consequentialist ethics. If I were to say that "Religion A sucks." Is this hate speech? If I were to say "Religion B has some values incompatible with the West." Is this hate speech? If I were to say that "members of race X are more likely to commit murder than those of race Y?" Is this hate speech? In a free society, no ideology, belief system, idea, theory, thought, or position is safe from fully muscular scrutiny. I understand the reflex to stomp ugliness but I support the right of Holocaust deniers and I'm Jewish.
This exchange really highlights the deranged woke mind virus that Charlie Kirk faced, and tried to help them see sense with calm debate.
As nice as he's being to these people, they still chose violence.
Things need to change, fast.