Market setting or re-rating is so fascinating in any industry but none top CFB. Team A pays $xMM for player A, player B now demands comparable pay to player A and so on. Combine with programs fueled by a never ending prestige race, and player values balloon
USC set the market last year with the No. 1 overall class in the Rivals Industry Team Recruiting Rankings with 35 signees. A year later, the Trojans are only expected to take 16 commits in the 2027 cycle.
That’s partly due to what they see as a class lacking the depth to spend top dollar on beyond the very top-end recruits.
More: https://t.co/JVoHW8qFsa
Big 12 Board approves Big 12 deal, is this similar to a board approving a M&A deal? It seems obvious to me that the Board would approve its own deal
NEWS: Big 12 board voted to authorize the deal between the conference and RedBird Capital. Weatherford Capital also part of deal.
It includes business relationship, $12.5M capital infusion in the league + opportunity for school-specific capital infusion https://t.co/u79nCFn9t4
What's fascinating is after the top 5 PSS programs, QB production (and most importantly $ values) show wild fluctuations. Would you assess QB $ values as relative to historical program production or relative to a tiering system?