@DeepPromptCine You're seeing it picked apart by almost everyone, including those who use AI. It's garden variety junk and has obvious errors, on top of her absurd "first AI feature film by a female" claim... which is total BS.
There WILL be amazing AI-powered films. This isn't it.
@SteveReinharz TRANSLATION: you're still losing money & will continue to dilute $AITX stock into oblivion.
But please, keep pumping out nonsense PR with "artist depictions" instead of anything of substance.
@SteveReinharzAI@AITXRAD@SteveReinharz Nice try, Stevo. The price of $AITX literally goes in one direction only: down. Your investors have lost millions of dollars and you're still not anywhere close to profitable.
@midjourney@GasperChia45367 Yes. It's exactly as I said. You can make cool stuff and combine ref images, but it absolutely does NOT create a consistent, realistic, believable character across scenes. Looking "kind of like" someone is not the same as looking like them.
@midjourney@GasperChia45367 Your example images are "better" how? We're talking about a character's FACE looking exactly the same in different scenes/contexts. Omni did that easily.
Not "oh that looks *like* her". Consistent character = "oh that's 100% the same person".
@midjourney@GasperChia45367 "You should be able to" is not the same thing as having a real "Consistent Character" ability. What you're showing here is cool but it absolutely DOES NOT translate to a character looking believably the same across a variety of images/scenes. Omni = better.
@edandersen Story and characters are what matter. Anyone, anyone, ANYONE can generate pretty AI images & video clips. But without compelling storytelling, no one will care. @techhalla